987
■adiative transfer code
:re was no correlation
surface temperatures
still be expected.
TC to retrieve surface
thod, they found that
as within 0.02 for all
d over grassland and
lly affected standard
candidate vegetation
effects. In a si m ilar
rements to validate a
AVI) computed from
r ides the capability of
lith angle.
te the surface energy
i Were combined with
components. It was
er on the radiometric
easured sensible heat
the measured values.
. The remote sensing
i 10 4 m. Differences
antly with pixel size.
boundary layer data
al. (1994a) attempted
only remotely-sensed
uniform aerodynamic
ere extrapolated to a
3te sensing to provide
means of estimating
i to estimate the soil
at TM measurements
getation temperature.
1 to estimate sensible
use the infrequently-
lable meteorological
growing season with
e, humidity and wind
>th latent and sensible
ited over the depth of
ch were compared to
:ed by the integrated
mting for large scale
3ES data with a solar
al stations inside and
stantaneous" satellite
rences in daily means
while five day means
3_3. Assessment of Surface Characteristics (box 3 of Figure 1).
3.3.1. Quality and Variability of Ground Truth Data. During Monsoon’90 and WG’92, latent heat flux was
estimated by making measurements of three of the four energy balance components (the residual approach),
namely net radiation (Rn), soil heat flux (G) and sensible heat flux (H). Rn and G were measured using
conventional instrumentation at each site, and H was determined by the variance method based on measurements
of air temperature and wind speed at one height. This technique satisfied the requirements for low-maintenance
and continued operation during each experiment. Research was conducted to compare energy balance
components measured using this approach with more traditional eddy correlation techniques. Stannard et al.
(1994) found that soil heat flux (G) measured by the different systems showed significant variability which was
mainly attributed to measurement errors and differences in technique used in estimating the heat storage in the
top 5 cm. The ratio of sensible (H) to latent (LE) heat fluxes, H/LE or the Bowen ratio, showed increasing
values going from eddy correlation tower to the gradient-measuring system. Kustas et al. (1994a) computed the
latent heat fluxes by having estimates of three of the four energy balance components (the residual approach),
namely Rn, G and H. The H-values were determined indirectly by the variance method. Comparison with the
eddy correlation measurements of H and LE at two sites with good fetch showed agreement between the two
techniques was within 20% for daytime conditions.
3-3.2. Inferring Geophysical and Biophysical Parameters Via Remote Sensing Information. Several
investigations addressed the relation between surface parameters and remotely sensed data acquired in the visible,
near-IR, thermal and microwave wavelengths. One study utilized vegetation indices (including NDVI) and
obtained surface information useful in modeling the water and energy balance. Moran et al. (1994a) found that
a soil-adjusted vegetation index (SAVI) from ground-, aircraft- and satellite-based sensors was highly correlated
with temporal changes in vegetation cover and biomass. On the other hand, quantifying the spatial variability
in these quantities across WGEW was less successful. Batchily et al. (1993) analyzed the temporal sequence of
eight TM images acquired during WG’92 to investigate existing and improved vegetation indices (Vis) to extract
spatial and temporal vegetation information. They found that most Vis yielded different results and
interpretations among the various ground covers and thus the choice of VI for vegetation monitoring and
assessment in semiarid regions became critical.
A detailed study of the variation in surface temperature and emissivity was conducted by Humes et al.
(1994b). From ground observations, they found differences between vegetation and soil background temperatures
were typically 10° to 25°C near midday. In addition, they discovered from ground and aircraft data that the
spatial variability in surface temperature at local and basin scales were similar, suggesting under certain
conditions spatial variability in surface temperature may be scale independent. The mixture of the soil and
vegetation at most sites yielded an average emissivity of about 0.98.
There were also techniques employed for estimating vegetation height and cover. Weltz et al. (1994) utilized
an airborne laser system for measuring landscape patterns over large areas as a way to determine mean vegetation
height and cover. Estimates of vegetation height and cover obtained from laser flights were compared to ground-
based line-transect methods. The agreement was quite good. Furthermore, the laser data provided the ability
to separate and map distinctly different plant communities. In another study, estimates of the local and regional
scale aerodynamic roughness for WGEW came from the laser data analyzed by Menenti and Ritchie (1994).
Values compared well to estimates obtained from techniques using micro-meteorological measurements.
The utility of remote sensing for mapping surface soil moisture was tested by Schmugge et al. (1994) and
Jackson et al. (1992) with passive microwave data collected from the PushBroom Microwave Radiometer
(PBMR) and the Multifrequency Microwave Radiometer (MMR), respectively. The brightness temperatures were
highly correlated to ground-based surface soil moisture measurements. They also discovered that changes in the
microwave brightness temperatures after a rainfall were highly correlated to the amount of rain, up to a certain
threshold value. Kustas et al. (1993) found a high correlation between microwave brightness temperatures and
the evaporative fraction (EF) when the contribution of soil evaporation was significantly affecting the magnitude
of EF. Under dry conditions, the spatial variability in EF was related to SAVI.
3.4. Discussion of Monsoon’90 and WG’92 Results
Preliminary results from the Monsoon’90 and WG’92 Experiments have addressed many of the issues involved
in the development of a distributed hydrologic model (Figure 1). Substantial progress was made in the utilization
of remotely-sensed data to infer surface characteristics (boxes 3 and 4). The effects of atmosphere and sun/sensor
geometry on sensor signal response in optical spectrum were quantified and operational techniques for correction
of these effects were proposed. With these corrections, optical data had potential for estimation of such surface