with different letters indicate that the means can be separated at a significance level of 1 % (a = 0.01). The result
indicates that the CAR1 performs better than other broad band indices in separating the means at LAI differences
of 0.05. Figure 7 is an illustration of the means and standard deviations of these vegetation indices plotted against
LAI. This figure summarizes that the CARI reduces effects of nonphotosynthetic materials in the assessment of
vegetation canopy y4 par more effectively than broad band vegetation indices.
4. CONCLUSIONS
These investigations demonstrate the potential utility of narrow reflectance bands for assessing biophysical
properties of vegetation canopy. The variability of broad band techniques due to background reflectance
characteristics are significantly reduced by CARI. It should be stressed that these conclusions are based solely
upon the results obtained with simulated canopy reflectances and that the SAIL model does not consider all the
natural phenomena in a vegetation canopy such as spectral variability due to woody biomass. Field experiments
are planned to evaluate, and further enhance the utility of CARI.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This research was supported by the Biospheric Sciences Branch, NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center and the
Remote Sensing Laboratory, USDA Beltsville Agricultural Research Center.
REFERENCES
Chappelle, E. W., Kim, M. S., and McMurtrey, J. E. (1992), Ratio Analysis of reflectance spectra (RARS): an
algorithm for the remote estimation of the concentrations of chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, and carotenoids in
soybean leaves, Remote Sens. Environ. 39:239-247
Choudhury, B. J. (1987), Relationships between vegetation indices, radiation absorption and net photosynthesis
evaluated by sensitivity analysis, Remote Sens. Environ. 22:209-233
Daughtry, C.S.T, McMurtrey, J.E., Chappelle, E.W., Dulaney, W.P., Irons, J.R., and Satterwhite, M.B. (1993),
Potential for discriminating crop residues from soil by reflectance and fluorescence technique, Int. Geoscience
Remote Sensing Symp. Tokyo, Japan. IGARSS’93 Digest 3:1325-1328
Demetriades-Shah, T. H., and Steven, M. D., and Clark, J. A. (1990), High resolution derivative spectra in remote
sensing, Remote Sens. Environ. 33:55-64
Goward, S. N., and Huemmrich, K. F. (1992), Vegetation canopy PAR absorptance and the normalized difference
vegetation index: an assessment using the SAIL model, Remote Sens. Environ. 39:119-140
Hall, F. G., Huemmrich, K. F., and Goward, S. N. (1990), Use of narrow band spectra to estimate fraction of
absorbed photosynthetically active radiation, Remote Sens. Environ. 32:47-54
Huete, A. R. (1988), A Soil-Adjusted Vegetation Index (SAVI), Remote Sens. Environ. 25:295-309
Huete, A. R. (1989), Soil influences in remotely sensed vegetation-canopy spectra. Theory and Applications of
Optical Remote Sensing (G. Asrar, Ed), New York, Wiley, pp 107-141
Kimes, D. S., (1984), Modeling the directional reflectance from complete homogeneous vegetation canopies with
various leaf-orientation distributions. J. Opt. Soc. Amer., 1:725-737
Suits, G. H., (1972), The calculation of the directional reflectance of a vegetative canopy, Remote Sens. Environ.
2:117-125
Verhoef, W. (1984), Light scattering by leaf layers with application to canopy reflectance modeling: the SAIL
model, Remote Sens. Environ. 16:125-141