10
"High-Stage“ Aerial Photography and ERTS Data-Based Systems
High-Stage Aerial Photography : A resource survey using (for the first
time in Montana) 1:80,000 scale quad-centered peak-of-green CIR aerial photo
graphy as a data base is progressing on schedule. The firm accomplishing the
interpretation and mapping contract has expressed its satisfaction with the
ability of this film/season/scale medium to provide the necessary resource
classifications. In some cases, for example, surprisingly small vegetation
communities and/or associations are identifiable by species or species group.
ERTS Data Applications : Results obtained with broad resource feature
mapping with ERTS data(color-combined transparencies projected onto a rear
projection screen at a scale of 1:125,000) on the BLM test site north of the
Missouri River had been fairly successful (Meyer and Gerbig, 1974). Five
specific surface resource categories had been quite accurately identified:
grassland, grassland/sagebrush, forest/woodland, bare shale slopes associated
with sagebrush/greasewood coulee bottoms and water.
Application of the same techniques to the Decker-Birney test site in
volved preliminary examination and testing of all available ERTS bulk imag
ery coverage -- including variations between dates of coverage, single bands
(4,5,6, 7) and various band/color/season combinations. As a result of these
tests, the May 19th Band 5 (green filter) and Band 7 (red filter) combination
was selected, projected onto the rear projection screen at a scale of 1:125,
000, and mapped by an experienced photo interpreter on the basis of 7 visible
image color differentials: red, pink, reddish-brown, tan, light tan, white,
blue. These 7 categories were then compared singly, and in various combina
tions, with the 5 previously-mapped ground truth categories (Pine-Woodland,
Ponderosa Pine, Grassland, Broadleaf (streamside) & Agriculture, Sagebrush-
Shrub) .
Those ERTS-mapped color differentials (or combinations thereof) which cor
related best with specific ground truth categories are illustrated in Figure 1.
It will be seen that the ERTS-generated reds and pinks corresponded best to
the Broadleaf-Agriculture category; tan corresponded to the combined Grassland/
Sagebrush-Shrub categories; and reddish brown corresponded to the combined Pine
Wood 1and/Ponderosa Pine categories.
For an overlook at the general area and configuration of these vegetation
types in large areas, this could be of some use as a first-stage over-view at
the start of a resource survey. But one must raise practical questions as to
its repeatability -- i.e., given the same or a similar area one or more years
from now, at a slightly different date with respect to vegetation peak-of-green
and/or at a different moisture level (and possible plant stage and vigor level)
either during the year under study or in previous years, etc. — would the
differentials provided by color combination reflect actual ground vegetation
variations to the same degree?