770
ERTS-1/MSS CCT no. 1044-15170 of Sept. 05, 1972
1315-15233 of June 03, 1973
1440-15154 of Oct. 06, 1973
DESCRIPTION OF THE TEST AREA AND GROUND CLASSES
The Larose Forest test area is located in the Great Lakes-St.
Lawrence forest region in southeastern Ontario approximately 30 miles east of
Ottawa. It is characterized by flat terrain with sandy soils once covered by
the Champlain Sea. Most of the present tree stands are about 35-year-old inte
plantations consisting of white spruce (Pioea glauca ), red pine (Pinus temp
resinoso ), white pine (Pinus strobus ) and poplars (Populus ). The test area impc
which includes the Larose Forest and surrounding agricultural land occupies aeri
216,000 ERTS pixels, that is about one thirty-fourth of the ERTS image area. of g
to t
Though the primary purpose of classification was to delineate c l as
agricultural land, coniferous forest and decidious forest, four more classes ERTS
were included in the classification scheme because of their distinctive comb
spectral signatures: three classes of water (deep water, clear shallow water, yiel
silted shallow water) and the 1971 landslide at the South Nation River.
Statistical description of ground classes was based on training sign
areas which were delineated within each class. Their selection is one of the coni
most important tasks because they provide the teaching patterns upon which the proc
computerized classification is based. If they are not representative for 1)•
respective classes, large classification errors will be introduced regardless feat
of sophistication of classification procedure used. The problem is especially ERTS
difficult in forest classification where local variations in species on
composition, maturity and vigor are frequently caused by microtopography, soil mult
type, moisture and diseases. Considering the relatively large size of pixels
(0.6 hectares) it is sometimes impossible to assign them into single classes
even if medium-scale aerial photographs or ground survey data are available. vect
Furthermore, the intensity and spectral distribution of visible and
near-infrared radiation reflected from vegetation are not constant and vary as as 1
a function of the species' phenological stage, sun elevation, weather
conditions and sensors' sensitivity at the time of recording. Hence, the
accuracy estimates of computerized forest classification more often represent
degree of success in selection of training areas, ERTS scenes and their
combination than accuracy measures of the classification algorithm.
The ground truth data for training areas and accuracy estimates were
provided by a 1960 forest cover map updated through medium-scale (1:10,000)
1969-72 color aerial photographs and spot field checks. Digital pixels of the
ERTS image were registered with corresponding image detail through a scaled
pixel grid. The scale differed along the x and y coordinates as a function of
the camera attitude. The grid was plotted on a transparency and overlaid on a whe]
photographic print which had to be corrected for terrain topography if image
distortion exceeded the size of one-half pixel.