I- June, 1999 
International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Vol. 32, Part 7-4-3 W6, Valladolid, Spain, 3-4 June, 1999 
high resolution 
mged to: 
(5) 
(6) 
3onent [b j low ] of 
id. Note that Eq. 
>ortant difference 
g factor” for the 
ich retains all the 
age (i.e. blurring 
ispectral image), 
led according to 
;en (degraded) 
i. Local contrast 
he local relation 
j mainly directed 
:tions where the 
is falls below a 
[uently occurs in 
ty result in badly 
testing different 
bstitute the local 
Jgorithm). 
Multi i hi 9 h 
■ ?.. 
J t p u t 
tsi»in.<nc i. vm 
True image (reference) 5m 
►\ >\ 
(d) Comparison 
- visual ranking 
- histogram analysis 
- global correlation 
- global regression 
- RMS-error 
- difference image 
|(a) Degrade x 5 
Multispectral fusion input 25m 
(b) 
ch1+ch2+ch3+ch4 
, J 
^Panchromatic band 5m 
SF- 
WWy »a;:;* 
31 t mSWi 
(c) Fusion procedure 
V Fusion results 5m 
Multiplication 
Brovey 
IHS 
PCS 
HFA 
HFM 
Wavelet Transform 
LUT recoding 
LCM 
Pan 5m 
if ' t« * 
¡25m True image 5 ml 
* * ■ * 
LCM 
HFM 
Brovey 
IHS 
• ; „ 
- *s-m 
rii- 
‘ 
<.-r 
Fig. 3. Validation concept test site Hillesheim and enlarged fusion result samples versus fusion input and true image (ch 421).