Full text: New perspectives to save cultural heritage

CIPA 2003 XIX th International Symposium, 30 September - 04 October, 2003, Antalya, Turkey 
evaluation stage, special zones and areas having similar 
values, potentials or problems have been searched for. For 
these zones, which are defined as “Special Project Areas”, 
special conservation decisions have been developed in detail 
according to their conditions. 
A scheme of implementation and an organization model that 
will handle the management of the site during the Urban 
Conservation Studies is proposed as the final stage of the 
project. 
4. RESULTS OF THE ANTAKYA PROJECT: 
A PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT 
Urban Conservation Project prepared for Zenginler Quarter in 
Antakya, enables making a preliminary appraisal of 
advantages and problems of the utilization of GIS. 
Accordingly, taking the case of Antakya Project as the point 
of departure, the major advantages of GIS when compared 
with the conventional techniques can be listed as follows: 
• Providing an extensive spatial database: GIS offer an 
invaluable medium for urban conservation projects as 
they are spatially referenced databases, which allow the 
connection of attribute data with the related spatial data. 
Hence, the spatial and attribute data concerning the 
historic site can be stored and studied in a single 
extensive environment. Consequently, the system enables 
visualizing spatial distribution of the attribute data, 
making queries over both attribute and spatial data, and 
creating thematic maps either one-by-one or as 
combination of multiple groups. 
• Providing an integrated environment: GIS supply 
integrated environment, in which different formats and 
types of data produced or processed by different 
softwares can be transferred into the system. That is, 
although the drawing capabilities of GIS are not 
advanced enough for the requirements of urban 
conservation projects, they enable using spatial data 
produced in CAD. Besides, processing of images through 
other softwares and transferring into the system is 
possible. 
• Continuity between scales: All the spatial data is entered 
into the system in 1/1 scale. Thereupon, GIS provide a 
continuous environment. That is, a wide range of 
different scales from 1/5000 including information about 
the town, to 1/50 including information about the 
architectural features of individual buildings could be 
studied and visualized altogether during the Antakya 
Project. 
• Easy renewal and correction: Opportunity of easy 
renewal and correction of data in GIS supplies a great 
advantage for up-to-dating the information in the 
analyses, evaluation and decision stages. Therefore, 
additions, subtractions or changes of categories made in 
the database are automatically presented in the maps 
produced in GIS. Whereas, in conventional techniques 
this updating process should be made one by one on each 
map. 
• Variety of display possibilities: GIS allow a variety in the 
display of results such as maps, tables and charts. All 
these increase the speed and richness of both the 
production and the presentation of the study. 
• Increase in speed and efficiency: This provides easier, 
quicker and more efficient execution of analysis and 
evaluation stages, when compared with the conventional 
techniques. Besides, the query of various data during the 
analysis and evaluation stages has increased the 
efficiency of decision-making stage since various topics 
could be argued together. 
However, as far as it is experienced through the case of 
Antakya, there are also some problems in using GIS as a tool 
in urban conservation projects. Those problems can be listed 
as follows: 
• Insufficient drawing /editing capacity: The adaptation of 
GIS is not enough yet for architectural studies since they 
are developed for large-scale urban or regional studies. 
Therefore, creating and editing spatial objects in the 
essential detail of architectural drawings is not enough 
sufficient in GIS. The drawing capacity of the program 
stays limited and thus, the drawing capacity or support 
with CAD programs should be improved. 
• Problems of renewal and updating of data transferred 
from other softwares: Even though GIS offers an 
integrated environment in which data produced and 
processed in other softwares can be used, the program 
does not enable the renewal and updating of such data. 
That is, when the spatial objects are drawn in CAD, like 
it has been done in Antakya Project, and when a 
correction or addition is needed to be done after 
transferring the spatial data into GIS and adding their 
attribute data, it is necessary to return to CAD, make the 
corrections, re-transfer all the spatial data and re-enter the 
related attribute data. This is a very long and time 
consuming process, and it is contradictory with the 
flexible environment that GIS offers. 
• Long-lasting preparation phase: Especially because the 
corrections of spatial data in the further stages of the 
study is so hard as described above, it becomes necessary 
to be very careful during the preparation phase and make 
the decisions as to the spatial object class of each spatial 
object prior to transferring them into GIS. This elongates 
the preparation phase of the study. 
5. EPILOGUE 
Urban Conservation Projects necessitate coping with 
complex issues concerning values, problems and potentials 
related to natural, physical and socio-economic aspects of the 
historic towns. In order to develop proper conservation 
policy, the characteristics of the town must be evaluated well, 
which may turn out to be a complex process. Since correct 
information leads to correct conservation decisions, heritage 
information management related to the historic town becomes 
inevitably important in urban conservation process. 
GIS allow establishing an extensive, flexible, continuous and 
sustainable heritage information system. Therefore, what is 
obtained with GIS is not only an urban conservation project. 
The project is just one of the various outputs of the whole 
extensive information system. 
Existence of such a system is very beneficial for urban 
conservation process. However, the success of the system 
depends on accurate design of database and the structure of 
the data processing, defining intelligent and adequate 
questions during the queries, correct data entry and 
systematic up dating. Otherwise, studies may result with an 
unuseful mass of data. Besides, it is a fact that, even though 
providing an extensive heritage information system and 
consequencing urban conservation projects are essential 
components of the urban conservation process, the success of 
the process depends more on the ones who will realize the 
decisions made within the legal and administrative 
framework of the country. The most advanced technology
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.