66 
REFERENCES 
R. Barzaghi, M.A. Brovelli, A. Manzion, D. Sguerso, 
G. Sona, 1996. The new Italian quasigeoid: 
ITALGE095. Bollettino di Geodesia e Scienze Affini, 
n. 1. 
M.T. Carrozzo, A. Chiarenti, M. Giadam, D. Luzio, 
C. Margiotta, D. Miglietta, M. Pedone, T. Quarta, F. 
Zuanni, 1982. Data bases of mean height values 
and gravity values. Proceedings of the 2 nd 
International Symposium on the Geoid in Europe 
and Mediterranean Area. 
KEY WOF 
ABSTRAC 
R. Forsberg, 1984. A study of terrain reduction, 
density anomalies and geophysical inversion 
methods in gravity field modelling. Reports of the 
Department of Geodetic Sciences and Surveying, N. 
355, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio. 
Some presei 
Logic and e 
This paper i 
principle so 
W. A. Heiskanen, H. Moritz, 1967. Physical 
Geodesy. W.H. Freeman, San Francisco. 
1. Histori 
F.G. Lemoine, S.C. Kenyon, J.K. Factor, R.G. 
Trimmer, N.K. Pavlis, D.S. Chinn, C.M. Cox, S.M. 
Klosko, S.B. Luthcke, M.H. Torrence, Y.M Wang, 
R,G, Williamson, E.C. Pavlis, R.H. Rapp, T.R. 
Olson, 1998. The development of the joint NASA 
GSFC and the National Imaginery and Mapping 
Agency (NIMA) geopotential model EGM96. NASA 
Report TP-1998-206861, Goddard Space Flight 
Center. 
Pattern Re 
Intelligence 
and/or imag 
(papers). 
In order to 
edges), a bi: 
an early see 
having dist: 
detection). 
W.D. Mac Millan, 1958. The theory of the potential. 
Dover publications, Inc., New York. 
The relation 
■ trar 
■ trar 
R. Rapp, 1997. The use of potential coefficient 
models in computing geoid undulations. Lecture 
Notes of the International School for the 
determination and use of the geoid, IGeS, DIIAR, 
Politecnico di Milano. 
space 
■ mai 
relation 
The researc 
them: every 
one characti 
image) and < 
Ample over 
Processing 
different st 
transformati 
temporal as} 
Many ISatu 
structure (St 
Technologie 
is often ?A 
position (e.g 
The human 
objects in c 
relations bet 
According t 
concepts; th 
which are < 
Saussure).