287
y that time a
1.
an intemation-
1889 “La foto-
Porro’s optical
s maps “le cave
ell’ argentera in
9 and “Gruppo
imetry was the
served as aerial
1917, and who
iana producing
rtly after World
nown in inter
is that Umberto
t manufacturer,
s a photogram-
pany S.A.R.A.
mti Aerophoto-
ith branches in
to photogram-
astre in Rome,
;s, and Prague,
nze close to the
re was the ISP
ch the father of
nt role.
Id War II, Italy
ir under Helava
Prof. Cunietti
ongresses from
presenting his
followers and
i this heritage,
td Togliatti are
The first space images taken by the Large
Format Camera of NASA were evaluated by
Giovanna Togliatti. At the EARSeL meeting
in Venice the foundation was laid to establish
working groups in space mapping in both
EARSeL and ISPRS. This led to the
possibility for Giovanna Togliatti to obtain
the first high resolution Russian Space images
in the western world.
The topic of my paper today is not directed
toward history but toward the future pro
fessional challenges, which lie in "mapping
from space' 5 .
In this paper I would first like to establish a
motivation, why I consider mapping from
space important. I would secondly like to
report as to what can be accomplished today.
And I would third like to open the challenging
scenario for mapping from space in the future.
Italy, within the European context, with
agencies such as ESRIN in Frascati, JRC in
Ispra, and academic institutions such as
Politecnico di Milano, and the University of
Naples have much to contribute within the
networks of ISPRS, OEEPE and EARSeL to
the further growth of our discipline.
2. Motivation for Mapping from Space
The main motivation of human activity is to
improve the living conditions in this world for
the individual and for society as a whole.
Preconditions for this are rooted in the
historical and geographic economic structures.
As society moved from nomadic to
agricultural, to industrial, and to service
oriented stages it became apparent, that
different geographic conditions exist for this
development. These are
■ climate
■ soil conditions
■ availability of mineral resources
■ labour
■ education
■ technical innovation, and
■ motivation.
The United Nations Agencies have tried to
find indicators for the level of development
achieved in each country controlling the
economy, such as
■ the percentage of employees in agriculture,
industry and services
■ the gross national product or the gross
domestic product per inhabitant
■ the percentage of own food supply
■ the number of inhabitants
■ child mortality.
Taking one of these indicators, the GNP 3
categories of countries have evolved:
■ the low level countries with a GNP under
600 S/inhabitant per year, usually with over
50 % of the workforce employed in
agriculture
■ the medium level countries with a GNP
between 600 $ and 3000 $ per year and
inhabitant, usually with a workforce of over
50 % engaged in industrial production
■ the high level countries with a GNP over
3000 $ per year and a service dominated
economy.
The nations of the world became concerned
about the uneven distribution of wealth, and for
this reason technology transfer was agreed upon.
Technical cooperation since the 1990’s has been
agreed upon. In 1991 over 50 % of the
contributions of 58 B US$ came from 5 high
level countries alone.
This contribution primarily went to 32.5 % to
Subsaharan African countries and to 27.1 % to
South East Asian countries. Despite the ups and
downs the development of South East Asia
would not have been possible without this
technical cooperation with African countries still
to follow.
Looking to the state of the world and its
predictable future we must note that the global
population has risen 71 % in a 32 year period.
Most of this development took place in the
developing countries in disaster affected coastal
areas and in the urban areas.
This happened while only 10 % of agricultural
area increase took place. The increase of food
production by 100 % needed for fight against
malnutrition had to be bought by fertilization
and irrigation of the soil pushing the capacity of
available land for agricultural production to a
limit.