19 
precision when using 
using more stations and 
rom our point of view, 
ince it is too difficult to 
m different stations, 
ndant measurements or 
the antenna for control 
ual adjustment, 
and the orientation of 
>n surveying from one 
of the co-ordinates 
each station in respect 
ocal network of all 
shown in the figure 
: range of 10 cm. 
ation and intersection 
sted as a minimum 
s local GPS station, 
en arbitrarily and thus, 
loice. 
are the calculated co- 
he calculated antennae 
ted one in the detailed 
s differences in the co 
large, and they could 
Fig. 9 - Graphical representation of the co-ordinate differences between 
MDL measurement and the combined one. 
Tab. 4 - the differences between the given co-ordinates of antennae frame center 
and the calculated co-ordinates, where the co-ordinates and rms are in meter. 
Differences of co-ordinates in the Italian National System (G.B) 
Site 
N 
rms* 
E 
rms 
H 
rms 
dn (m) 
de (m) 
dh (m) 
Bo-ASST 
4930092.3 
0.08 
1686579.9 
0.08 
77.1 
0.1 
-55.9 
5.8 
-3.2 
UNICOPER 
4931623.1 
0.07 
1687752.1 
0.07 
85.3 
0.1 
-8.4 
71.6 
7.5 
STADIO 
4929506.2 
0.08 
1683981.2 
0.08 
53.7 
0.1 
-71.5 
87.4 
-1.3 
BO- CENTRO 
4929691.4 
0.08 
1686368.2 
0.08 
113.0 
0.1 
10.5 
-64.6 
-3.6 
GRIZZANA 
4903445.8 
0.12 
1672095.1 
0.12 
683.3 
0.15 
-56.9 
2.3 
// 
* the rms include the errors in transformation parameters 
Tab. 5 - The differences between the given orientation of the antenna panels in 
the detailed drawing and the calculated one 
structure 
given 
Calculated * 
Diff. 
BO- ASST 
60 
73° 15’+- 32’ 
13° 15’ 
180 
182° 30’+- 16’ 
2° 30’ 
300 
309° 12’ +- 40’ 
9° 12’ 
UNICOPER 
60 
III 
// 
180 
III 
// 
300 
318° 32’ +-4’ 
18° 32’ 
STADIO 
60 
III 
// 
180 
197° 50’ +- 8’ 
17° 50’ 
300 
296° 09’ +- 8’ 
-4° 51’ 
GRIZZANA 
60 
67° 45’ +- 6’ 
7° 45’ 
180 
165° 15’ +-4’ 
-14° 45’ 
300 
264° 6’ 
35° 54’ 
Bo-Centro 
104° 
108°18’ 
4° 18’ 
194° 
198°18’ 
4° 18’ 
284° 
oo 
r—< 
O 
CO 
oo 
<N 
4° 18’ 
* the rms related to the adjusted redundant measurements.