28 
Fornaci 
200 
29 
Forcella 
1324 
30 
Castel di Leves 
959 
31 
Punta W 
200 
32 
Tremezzo 
1699.4 
33 
Abbadia 
200 
34 
Crocione 
1641.5 
35 
Coltignone 
1270 
36 
Coltignone 
962 
37 
Coltignone 
1046 
Table 1 - Set of points identified on the panorama 
Figure 3. Identification of the same set of points on the two panoramas 
For this comparison, the measurements performed on the 
ancient panorama on the horizontal and vertical axis, 
firstly used to localize the points of view, were newly used 
together with the same type of measurements, done on 
the photogrammetric panorama (Figure 4). 
Figure 4 - Measurements performed on the ancient and 
photogrammetric panoramas 
The differences, among these measurements, have not 
pointed out a simple systematic behavior. However they 
show very high values, related the points localized in the 
second section of the panorama (Table 2). 
Point number 
DX (mm) 
DZ (mm) 
1 
0 
12.5 
2 
-22.6 
-11.4 
3 
-15.7 
-6.3 
4 
-5.9 
7.2 
6 
-0.7 
13 
7 
12 
17.8 
8 
13.2 
18 
9 
15 
17.9 
10 
19 
5.1 
11 
12 
14.7 
13 
-38.7 
9 
14 
-30.8 
9.2 
15 
23.2 
39.7 
16 
29.7 
30.8 
18 
-40.4 
12 
19 
32.4 
42.7 
20 
28.5 
36.7 
22 
48 
44.2 
23 
58.3 
40.7 
24 
59.4 
40.1 
25 
62 
39.8 
26 
66.9 
39 
27 
69.6 
34.1 
30 
53.2 
46.9 
32 
50.7 
52.1 
34 
65.5 
52 
35 
52.5 
5.9 
36 
69.6 
11.9 
37 
73.7 
11.9 
Table 2 - Differences between the ancient panorama and 
the photogrammetric one