28 
SAR image has its own characteristics. How to chose or 
organize the algorithms in optimization is desirable to study in 
the future. 
REFERENCES 
[1] C. Pohl, J.L. Van Genderen. Mulitisensor image fusion in 
remote sensing: concepts, methods and applications, 
International Journal of Remote Sensing, 19(5): 823-854, 1998. 
[2] J.D.Knowles, D.W. Come. Approximating the nondominated 
front using the Pareto archived evolution strategy, Evolutionary 
Computation, 8(2): 149-172, 2000. 
[3] K. Deb, A. Pratap, S. Agarwal, T. Meyarivan. A fast and 
elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II, IEEE Trans. 
Evol. Comput., 6(2): 182-197, 2002. 
[4] C.A. Coello, G. T. Pulido, M. S. Lechuga. Handling 
multiple objectives with particle swarm optimization, IEEE 
Trans. Evol. Comput., 8(3):256-279, 2004. 
[5] Yifeng Niu,Lincheng Shen. A Novel Approach to Image 
Fusion Based on Multi-Objective Optimization, Proceedings of 
the 6th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation, 
Dalian, China , IEEE: 9911-9915,2006. 
[6] Zhong. Zhang, Rick S. Blum. A categorization of 
multiscale-decomposition-based image fusion schemes with a 
performance study for a digital camera application. Proceedings 
of IEEE, 87(8): 1315-1326, 1999. 
[7] Yin Chen, Rick S. Blum. Experimental Tests of Image 
Fusion for Night Vision. The 7th International Conference on 
Information Fusion, IEEE: 491-498, 2005. 
[8] Zhongxiu Hu ,Scott T. Acton. Morphological Pyramid 
Image Registration. 
http://ieeexplore.ieee.Org/iel5/6776/l 8128/00839604.pdf 
[9] A. Toet. Image fusion by a ratio of low-pass pyramid. 
Pattern Recognition Letters, 9:245-253, 1996. 
[10] J.Kennedy, R.C. Eberhart. Particle swarm optimization, 
Proc.IEEE Int. Conf. Neural Networks, 4:1942-1948, 1995. 
[11] M.R. Sierra, C.A. Coello, Improving PSO-based multi 
objective optimization using crowding, mutation and e- 
dominance, Proc. EMO 2005, LNCS, vol. 3410: 505-519,2005. 
[12] Y. Shi, R.C. Eberhart. A modified particle swarm 
optimizer. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Evol. Comput.: 69-73, 1998. 
[13] R.C. Eberhart, Y. Shi. Particle swarm optimization: 
development, applications and resources. Proc. IEEE Conf. 
Evol. Comput: 81-86, 2001. 
[14] Z.J. Wang, D. Ziou, C. Armenakis, et al. Comparative 
analysis of image fusion methods, IEEE Trans. GeoRS., 43(6): 
1391-1402, 2005. 
[15] J. Li. Spatial quality evaluation of fusion of different 
resolution images. International Archives of Photogrammetry 
and Remote Sensing, Vol.33, 2000. 
[16] V. Buntilov, T. Bretschneider. Objective content dependent 
quality measures for image fusion of optical data. IEEE 
International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium,613- 
616, 2004. 
[17] A. Toet, E. M. Franken. Perceptual Evaluation of Different 
Image Fusion Schemes. Displays, 24(l):25-37, 2003. 
[18] G. Piella, H. Heijmans. A new quality metric for image 
fusion. Proceedings of International Conference on Image 
Processing, 173-176, 2003. 
[19] Guihong Qu, Dali Zhang. Information measure for 
performance of image fusion. Electronics Letters, 38(7):313- 
315,2002. 
[20] Zhou Wang, Alan C. Bovik. A universal image quality 
index. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 9(3):81 -84, 2002. 
ORTHOR] 
a I 
KEY WORDS: 
ABSTRACT: 
A method to ort 
image according 
information mat 
be registered fn 
homologous poi 
well as the relat: 
result is satisfact 
Being an effe< 
aperture radar | 
complimentary 
weather capabil 
launched since 
Chinese first 
monitoring will 
image must be 
without any di 
digital elevatio: 
influence of terr, 
methods to recti 
fine the satelliti 
points (GCP) th 
DEM is combim 
image. The oth< 
using DEM dire 
into the geo-i 
corresponding r 
and real SAR ii 
automatically. T 
GCP is not nee 
possible to orth 
distortion canno 
the simulated S. 
SAR image in oi 
method is used, 
with real SAR f 
proposed in thi: 
rectified based o 
2. SIMUL, 
Simulated SAR 
geometry princi 
DEM. Both 
corresponding tc 
in order to gene 
range-Doppler ft 
grid point beca 
synthetic using I