Table 1
REGIONAL
ZONAL
LOCAL
-State workcobjective'blearly and
the space involved.
-Verify objective compatibility
with size of the geomorphic unit.
-State work objective clearly and
the space involved.
-Verify objective compatibility
with size of geomorphic subunits.
-Compile available information about —
w topography,vegetation,climate,soils,
h space organization,etc. of similar
o perception level.
o-Use and documents selection:sate
llite imagery,reduced photomosaics
and photoindexes.
-Information evaluation,emphasizing
specific correlations between mo
dels (patterns) , and changes in li
mits and their transitions.
-Try a global primary correlation;
verify correlations.
-With all the information(documents) 1
try to find control parameters, cli
matic, geodynamics and anthropic.
-Detection of regional breaks of slo^ -
pe(neat and transitional limits)and
of anthropic models(zones) breaks.
-With available information try to
find cohesion factors of each zone.
-Execute drainage net and surface
runoff system analysis(former points
correlation)and limits adjustments.
-Execute .soils and vegetation analy- -
sis on the base of tone and texture
variations; correlation with former
points.
-Execute anthropic models analysis
verify its correlation with former
points.
-Study interference degree of sys
tems and subsystems.
-Study how the system runs.
Compile available information
about topography,vegetation,climatr
te, soils,space organization,etc.
of similar perception level inclu
ding important field work data.
Use and documents selection:medium
scale airphotos,enlarged satellite
imagery.Stereoscopy is important.
■Information evaluation,emphasizing
particular aspects of models and
nets(natural and anthropic).Spe
cial care in causes study.
■Perform intrinsic correlation and
also with the other two perception
levels.Correlation with field work
data in first approximation.
-State work objective clearly and
the space involved.
-Verify objective compatibility with
forms and processes that can be per
ceived in the image.
-Compile available information about
topography,vegetation,climate,soils,
space organization, etc. of similar
perception level including very im
portant field work data.
-Use and documents selection :large
scale airphotos.Relief study and
stereoscopy are indispensable.
-Information evaluation,supported by
photointerpretation highly speciali
zed, strong correlation with field
work data;processes study emphasis.
-Perform intrinsic correlation and
also with superior perception le
vels .
■with all the information try to
know geomorphic subsystems and its
dynamics;first correlations.
■Execute models detailed analysis;
correlation with constituent ele
ments and processes also.
■Execute paleoforms and paleomodels
detailed study.
■Execute correlation study between
models of analyzed subsystems, in
cluding paleosystems.
•Execute analysis of anomalies and
lacks of correlation between models;
determine structural(organization)
and functional causes.
■Execute dynamic approach and ten
dency study.
-Wîth all the information try to
know processes and tendencies.
-Execute models detailed analysis;
correlation with processes and
constituent elements.
-Execute correlation with sup. percep
tion level,anomalies and deviations.
-Study internal model variations
and/or constituent elements.
-Execute dynamic approach and ten
dency study.
-Select images to be employed,those
appropriate for units determination
at this level.
-Establish models and its correla
tion with reality,(large units,re
lief forms assemblies,lineaments
and geotectonic models,major surfa
ce runoff systems,large vegetation
and soils units,anthropic model or
ganization of space.
-Establish dynamic aspects detecta
ble on images(e.g. headwaters re
treat, eolian activity,etc.).
-Elaborate global problem interpreta
tion reflected on the imagery(sta
tic, dynamic and the tendency).
-Select images which offer best con
trast of patterns and identifica
tion of constituent elements.
-Establish specific models of analy-
lyzed systems and subsystems,(surfa_
ce runoff nets,vegetation physiogno^
my and soils,anthropic space organi
zation)and paleosystems as well.
-Establish elements and organization
net which constitutes each model Re
fine limits types in detail.
-Establish dynamic aspects detecta
ble on the images and relation bet
ween elements and organization nets;
feed back mechanisms relation.
-Elaborate global problem interpreta
tion reflected on the imagery(sta-
tic,dynamic and the tendency) ■
-Select images that allows identifi
cation of elements and patterns,di
rect correlation with reality.
-Establish elements and its associa
tions and/or its spatial and morpho
logic relations.
-Elaborate rietworks "and constituent
elements observed details.
-Establish dynamic aspects that can
be detected on the images and its
tendency.
-Elaborate punctual problem interpre
tation that have to be correlated
with previous perception level.
-Establish representation scale
>1:100.000
-Establish representation priorities
.Perceived geomorphic units and sub
units. (taxonomic superior orders).
•Surface runoff nets and systems.
®.Surface runoff and geomorphic pro-
«; cesses dynamic and tendency,
u.Anthropic aspects and tendency(ac-
H cording,to the objective).
«¡-Elaborate legend.
.Homogeneous units designation on
the base of geomorphology,climate,
vegetation and soils.
-Elaborate symbology.
-Establish representation scale
1:100.000 to 1:25.000
-Establish representation priorities
.Models and limits.
.Surface runoff nets and systems in
detail.
.Surface runoff and geomorphic pro
cesses dynamic and tendency.
.Difference between actual models
and paleomodels.
.Anthropic aspects and tendency(ac
cording to the objective).
-Elaborate legend.
.Taxonomic and homogeneous designa
tion of models.
-Elaborate symbology.
-Establish representation scale
<1:10.000
-Establish representation priorities
.Elements and models.
.Variations between elements and or
ganization models.
.Surface runoff systems and networks
in detail.
.Geomorphic and anthropic processes
dynamic and tendency.
-Elaborate legend.
■Taxonomic aadihomOgeneous designa
tion of elements and models.
-Elaborate symbology.
cartograpl
when smal;
perceived
Logical
logical u
ral, lith
effects c
By the
relief fo
influence
forms and
special c
rrelation
engaged,
pasts.
Care mu
any kind i
level is i
limits am
ments can
self.
Consequi
in this 1<
is the ma;
zation an<
interpret;
At zona!
ly far aw;
to one ob:
tion is e;
fig.2 real
complexity
venient fc
of import;
Frequent
arrangemer
factors di
For exampl
be interpi
karstic, j
For the
breaks of
tectonic c
of their c
paleoclima
Summing
this level
interferen
sses. Fro
perception
pretation
dency and
At local
the habitu
interprete
must see",
ization.
This is
processes,
integrate
Neverthe
finish thi
complement
organizati
degree is i
Scale repr>
The last q
in the pre
one of the
It can o<
one scale ;
that a tot;
graphic rej
the existei
and cartog:
and then w)
level irnag«
That is 1
mapping el;