Full text: Remote sensing for resources development and environmental management (Volume 2)

le natural veg- 
: t season), 
if the differ- 
the main crops 
; u remen t s of 
vegetation 
wet sea son . 
iurements of 
; of its veg- 
leve1opment, 
I" of the USLE 
al vegetation, 
ages of 11 C" 
en t coverage 
if the area 
ide on the 
'en by techni- 
i of the per- 
; diverse cov- 
t was made 
.andsat pic- 
the wet sea- 
I controls. 
:a 1 cui at ion of 
: after the 
lua 1 357 of 
: or Agriculture, 
i be seen that 
:ween the soil 
: cove rage va 1 - 
íoun ta i nous 
II woo d , po s - 
:<0.1). To- 
deciduous f o r - 
i be con s i d - 
precipitation 
jht1y cove rage 
central and 
ihaco forest, 
p roces ses, 
(0. 16-0.20) 
the main crops. 
main crops 
the region 
ations in the 
rage values 
xploitation, 
f the sorghum 
Finally, in 
- - 
EROSION HAZARD 
Location mao 
rNo erosion 
Soil loss 
Tn / ha/y. 
0 - 5 
I •. • ] Very low 
5-14 
11 Zl Low 
14 - 29 
Moderate 
29 - 47 
mg Mod ® ,ely 
47 - 63 
High 
63 - 60 
Very high 
> 80 
'K' 
600 0.6 
500*0.5 
400 
300 
200*0.2 
100 
0.1 
mts. 
2.5 
2.000 
1.50' 
1.i 
500 
000 ^ 
EZ3 sfJity a iR) r0 ‘ E3 ^E3 siop^ (LSI E3 < CI B ha¿r 0 í 
l / 'i 
'—r 
\ 
ell*"*?**-*?' - 
<-* ✓ 
^ —M — K—K—X — » -* - * 
-X 
'■* w ■ 
007 
•lS 
10 
100 
4 00 
200 
[V/»l Granito 
lZrrI-r| Loess 
Sandstone 
Sandstone and Rpgn a-Gravel b-Sand 
silt tLaMlc-Silt d-Clay 
abed 
FIGURE 7 Schematic erosion hazard map of the study area with a profil (PP 1 ) showing the region 
al distribution of erosion factors and soil loss 
the alluvial plain, the sugar cane and cere 
als cultures are the ones which show the low 
est coverage values (0.26-0.35), thus reflec 
ting the prolonged period of their vegetative 
cycle during which they remain with little 
cove rage. 
THE EROSION HAZARD 
The schematic map of FIGURE 7 shows the ero 
sion hazard classes in the area expressed in 
d i fferent. rates of potential soil, loss, as it 
can be seen in the attached TABLE 1 and in the 
profil also included in figure 7, the erosion 
factors in the extended studied area show a 
great variation which is reflected in the wide 
range of values obtained for the potential 
soil loss. 
TABLE 1 Variation extremes of erosion factors 
Erosion factors Values interval 
Rainfall erosivity ( R) 
Soil erodibility (K) 
Slope ( LS) 
Coverage (C) 
Potential soil loss 
110-600 
0.30-0.65 
0.15-16 
0.005-0.34 
1.7-90 tn/ha/y 
673
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.