979
d time-criti-
:ext of flood
come increas-
problems have
or satellite-
the Seasat
1 B (1981 and
xpected, such
the Japanese
dian Radarsat
ler erratic—
can compete
3wave systems
ddle and far
, though very
lways been a
om satellites
plications in
particularly
mapping mis-
g all usable
ii has already
rather than
expected for
atellite sys-
from the con-
opic imagery
laser-altime-
ch that defor
gravitational
ion about the
obtained. The
ce this is a
lopments are
ce is in its
d, particular
id photogram-
in inter
several types
re spacecraft
launched for
are, in fact,
emphasis put
he study of
science ap-
or photogram-
space research, resulting in a centralized admini
stration. This seems hardly feasible to me: many
countries want to develop their own satellites and
administrative structures, fully participating in
the high technology of the future and enhancing
their national prestige. Personally, I feel that
such competition is very desirable because only
this way will challenges be mutually presented that
will yield optimum results. Good international co
operation will, of course, be required to avoid
major inefficiencies and undue duplications.
The best solution may prove to be joint efforts
of groups of countries. This could to be a very
inportant aspect of space technology: bringing the
nations together because there is a job at hand that
cannot be done by any country individually. This
job, I think, is to study, map and monitor the globe
with the aim of safeguarding our threatened environ
ment, "mother earth", for the generations to come
and to give them the quality of life required for
economic social and spiritual development. We should
not pursue technology for its own sake but put it to
use for the study of the "ordinary business of
life", a term I quote from a recent issue of the UNU
periodical "Work in Progress". Only this way will
the costly efforts of space research in the long run
be justified! May this symposium contribute to this
aim. I wish you all a good journey home and success
in your work. I hope to see you again in Kyoto,
1988!
ing,
disaster
Hites having
iched in the
Llite techno-
rery high. In
on or Space,
, an annual
expected a-
liture by the
1 (approxima
lis the con-
of countries
etc., astro-
Lgures assume
ling decades,
y less funds
the lead in