Fig. 1: MOMS-01 modular concept
Fig. 2: M0MS-01 dual optics principle
MOM« - 01 COMFIOUftATION
Fig. 3: MOMS-01 flight configuration
Fig. 4: MOMS data takes and testsites for the data
comparison
between MOMS and 1M technical specifications.
Due to problems with the HDT - CCT conversion and
radiometric correction procedure MOMS data for the
analyses carried out at NASA and presented in this
paper have been performed on the. basis of raw data
TM 1 2 3 4 5 7
\
\
s
\
\
Ì
*
!
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
N
s
--
--
Dry bare soil (Gray-brown)
.
1
i
"11 1 1
h--\|
\ \
N \
O
Water (Clea
~ V ' '
\
,—
r|
0
n
k N
r ’ i T * 1 1 1 1— l ~n
0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 18 2 0 2 2 2 4 2 6
Wavelength ||im)
Wévelength (nm)
-Fig. 5 : Comparison of MOMS-01 and Thematic
Mapper spectral bands and TM bands
in relation to the average
reflectance curves of dry bare soil,
vegetation and clear water.
Table 1: MOMS-01 and Thematic Mapper
comparison.
system
MOMS
TM
SENSOR
"PUSH-BROOM" CHARGED SCANNING MIRROR WITH
COUPLED DEVICE DETECTOR ARRAYS
IFOV
67.5 urad
42.5 fir ad
GROUND PIXEL
20 m
30 m
SIZE
1300 km ORBIT)
(705 km ORBIT)
GROUND PIXELS
PER LINE
6912 IFOV
6320 IFOV
SWATH LENGTH
1 38 km
185 km
RADIOMETRIC
RESOLUTION
128 (7-BIT)
256 (8-BIT)
SPECTRAL BANDS
2
7
COMPARABLE
BAND WIDTHS
600 ± 25 nm
900 ± 75 nm
560 ± 40 nm
660 ± 30 nm
830 t 70 nm
IFOV DWELL TIME
2.81 msec (STS-7)
2.71 msec (STS-11)
9.611 /¿sec
Only for the most
recent evaluations
of the AGF-
Working Group published here, operational radio-
metrically corrected data sets were available.
The Thematic Mapper data used for the comparison
were radiometrically and geometrically corrected
and resampled using cubic convolution interpolation
to a 28,5 meter grid during the ground processing
as part of theTM Image Processing System (TIPS) at
Goddard Space Flight Center.
The comparative analyses of digital data at
NASA/GSFC war carried out the following way:
- rotate MOMS dara 90 degrees counterclockwise, as
both system's orbit inclinations are nearly
perpendicular;
- select common ground control points;
- register TM bands 2, 3 and 4 to MOMS bands using
second order polynomia coordinate transforms and
nearest neighborhood resampling;