Building types
Type of project Shop-
(Use for area house
delineation)
Detached
house
Semi-de
tached
row
house
walk-up
apt.
multi-st.
apt.
sites
+ser-
vices
1. Private formal
1.1 shophouse projects X
1.2 Private housing proj.
X
X
X
X
X
1.3 Land subdivision proj.
X
1.4 Individual buildings X
X
X
2. Public formal
2.1 NHA projects X
X
X
X
X
X
X
2.2 Non NHA projects
X
X
X
3. Informal sector
3.1 Slum/Squatter types
X
X
3.2 Potential slums
X
X
3.4 Mini slums
X
3.5 Klong houses
X
6.5 Interpretation criteria for residential class
delineation:
Following criteria have been used for interpreting
the residential areas:
Class Criteria used.
from the airphoto to compute the number of units.
According to the local building code, the number of
housing units in one structure will never exceed 24
units, which implies that sometimes a wider frontage
from 5 up to 8 meter must be applied. Data on hous
ing units in multi-storey buildings were preferably
obtained from fieldchecks.
Shophouse
Private housing
project
Land subdivision
Individual project
Public sector
Informal sector
Shape of building, relative
locations and stereo height.
Similarity of housing type,
repetition of road pattern
relative location (mostly newly
developed area) and mostly no
vacant plot in between each
house.
Similarity in housing lay-out,
repetition of road patterns,
low density because a number of
vacant plots exist in between
each house, relative location
(mostly newly developed area).
Areas which do not belong to the
first 3 afore mentioned classes,
and small scale.
Not interpreted, data from other
sources.
Size of each house relatively
small, irregular pattern of lay
out and settlement boundary with
high density, relative location
(behind shophouse or proximity
to industrial land use, or along
public land such as railway or
canal area where general
condition is worse, image is
shown in texture).
6.7 Housing unit estimate in the informal settlement
In the informal settlement area, the landuse
method as developed by Krause et al (1974) has been
applied. Types of informal settlement were clas
sified also according to their densities:
Type of settlement
Density applied
1. Squatter type
2. Slum type
3. Potential slum
4. Potential slum
class 1 dg =
class 2 d^ =
150 houses/hectare
130 houses/hectare
100 houses/hectare
80 houses/hectare
The measurement of area per type of settlement was
done by counting dots with a ’dot grid*, and as
signed a code i.e. A^.Ag.A^and A^. Total number of
housing stock in each settlement type were derived
from:
H = A. d
where H = total housing unit
A = total area devoted to each type of
settlement
d = the average housing density belong
to that type of settlement.
To help the photo interpreters with the inter
pretation criteria, a stereoscopic photo-key was
made for reference by the interpreters. Fig.l il
lustrates some of the main elements from this photo
key.
6.6 Counting of houses
The value for each housing density (d) was derived
from the average number of houses counted in a
hectare block of each particular type of settlement.
The areas for counting that type of settlement were
selected prior to the available updated large scale
map so that comparative counting from airphoto and
map of the same area could be done.
The housing unit count depended to some extent on
the local frame of reference. For certain types of
housing, where individual units cannot be clearly
seen on the airphoto, like rowhouse, shophouse or
semi-detached house, some clues on environmental
aspects, such as the presence of entrance, plot
boundary on the front or back yard will be searched.
In case no clues were identifiable, a standard 4
meter front width was applied for shophouses and
rowhouses. The length of the building was measured
6.8 Final output
By this methodology, data on number of housing
stock and residential area by type of housing
project and by type of housing of 1984 and 1974 were
obtained in district wise.
The total sum of all classes plus 5% is the total
housing stock. This 5% forms the class ’other’ which
housing units could not be identified from air