512
12
imprudent and premature political
rush to regulate and legislate
environmental solutions before
there is an adequate understanding
of the differences between natural
and man-made global change and what
man-made impacts are a necessary
consequence of acceptable national
standards of living and industrial
economic activities.
In response to the Washington,
D.C. "bandwagon" series of public
hearings and related extensive
media coverage on "Global Warming"
in 1988 and 1989, several industry
organizations expanded their
activities in response to these and
other publicly sensitive
environmental issues involving
industry such as "acid rain" and
clean air legislation and the Exxon
Valdez oil spill in Prince William
Sound, Alaska.
One particularly visible
organization focusing on global
change studies and potential
monitoring and regulation is the
newly formed (1989) Coalition on
Global Climate Change in
Washington, D.C. This Coalition
consists at present of company and
industry association lobbyists,
government affairs representatives,
environmentalists and lawyers who
are coordinating industry responses
to the Washington and public
bandwagon politics of global
warming and global change
activities and proposed
legislation. The Coalition was
initiated through committees of the
U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the
Chemical Manufacturer's
Association, the National
Association of Manufacturers and
others. It has participated in
numerous hearings and has presented
a general industry view of
supporting global warming and
global climate change research as
the basis of increased and focused
industry-government environmental
management through prudent
legislation and regulation coupled
with responsible industry actions.
The Geosat Committee
Cooperative Research Initiative
Another new industry initiative
is that of the Geosat Committee on
behalf of the resource industries.
This initiative is focused on
establishing cooperative industry -
government R&D on global change
studies and environmental
management with an emphasis on
earth observations applications.
This initiative grew out of
concerns by the Geosat Committee
that NASA EOS global change
research was being promoted without
significant industry participation
and the CES Global Change Research
Plan also did not include
mechanisms for cooperative industry
R&D.
Several meetings were held in
1989 and early 1990 between the
Geosat Committee and members of the
CES working group on global change
studies. These meetings produced
general agreement that it would be
mutually beneficial if the CES and
the resource industries could
develop mechanisms for cooperative
R&D on earth observations
applications for global change
studies and environmental
management. A major problem to be
solved is under what mechanisms can
industry R&D be linked to that of
government in general, and of the
CES GCRP in particular. Moreover,
how can such cooperative R&D be
conducted in a manner which is
credible to the media and to the
general public at large?
In the Spring of 1990,
discussions were held between