Figure 6. Expert system analysis of calcite lab
spectrum (Figures 2 and 3, From Kruse et
al., 1990a).
6A. FEATURE ANALYSIS:
BAND
ORDER
WAVE(um)
DEPTH
FWHM
ASYM
1
1/1
2.340
0.3001
0.0980
0.3047
2
1/1
1.997
0.0788
0.0490
0.5154
3
1/1
1.870
0.0603
0.0490
0.6033
4
1/1
2.164
0.0452
0.0392
0.1947
6B. EXPERT SYSTEM BROAD CLASSIFICATION:
There are features from: vegetation
carbonates
clays
micas and illites
calcite
6C. BINARY
ENCODING MATCHES (percentage):
Buddingtonite
85.24
Kaolinite
80.00
Montm
82.86
Pyrophyllite
83.33
Illite
35.71
Muscovite
56.19
Alunite
74.76
Gypsum
65.71
Epidote
53.81
Chlorite
40.95
Calcite
100.00
Dolomite
86.19
Actinolite
52.38
Tremolite
84.29
Jarosite
58.10
Hematite
53.81
Goethite
56.67
Green Vegetation
58.10
Dry Grass
73.33
6D. CALCITE FINAL RESULTS - WEIGHTED DECISION:
According to the expert system and the binary encoding
performed on the spectrum, the probability of the presence of:
perpendicular to the the aircraft direction. The
second dimension of the images is provided by the
forward motion of the aircraft, which moves the
ground field of view along the terrain.
Two areas were initially selected for analysis with the
expert system. To simplify the testing, these were
both geologic sites in semi-arid areas of well exposed
mineralogy. Future efforts will look at more difficult
test sites. The feature extraction procedures and the
expert system were successfully used to analyze
individual imaging spectrometer spectra for the two
sites. The expert system successfully identified the
minerals kaolinite, alunite, and buddingtonite at one
site using 63 channel imaging spectrometer data
(Kruse et ah, 1990b) and the minerals hematite,
goethite, sericite (fine grained muscovite), calcite and
dolomite at another site using the 224 channel
AVIRIS data (Kruse, 1990; Kruse et ah, 1990a).
The AVIRIS data were obtained during May 1989
with signal-to-noise ratios of approximately 50/1 at
0.70 pm and 20/1 at 2.20 pm. They were calibrated to
reflectance using ground targets and the empirical
line method (Kruse et al., 1990b). Two wavelength
ranges of the AVIRIS data were used to identify and
map the distribution of alteration minerals. The
short-wave infrared data from 2.0 to 2.5 micrometers
were used to identify and map the distribution of
sericite, calcite, and dolomite. The visible and near-
infrared (0.41-1.2 pm) portions of the spectrum were
used for identification and mapping of iron oxide
minerals.
Calcite is nearly certain
Dolomite is medium
Buddingtonite is medium
Muscovite is medium
6E. JUSTIFICATION - CALCITE:
The binary match to calcite is 100.00 % so
the binary match is rated very high
The carbonate feature between 2.30 and 2.35 pm is present
The calcite feature at 2.34 pm is present
The overall expert guess for the probability of
calcite is Nearly Certain
6F. JUSTIFICATION - DOLOMITE:
The binary match to dolomite is 86.19 % so
the binary match is rated high
The carbonate feature between 2.30 and 2.35 pm is present
The dolomite feature at 2.32 pm is not present
The overall expert guess for the probability of dolomite is
Medium
AVIRIS IMAGE ANALYSIS
AVIRIS is the first of a second generation of imaging
spectrometers measuring near-laboratory quality
spectra in 224 10 nm-wide channels in the spectral
range 0.41 to 2.45 pm (Porter and Enmark, 1987). The
AVIRIS is flown aboard the NASA ER-2 aircraft at an
altitude of 20 km, with an instantaneous field of
view of 20 m and a swath width of about 10 km. It
utilizes four linear arrays and four individual
spectrometers to collect data simultaneously for the
224 bands in a scanned 614 pixel-wide swath
Figure 7 shows individual spectra extracted from
AVIRIS data for known occurrences of calcite, and
dolomite and the expert system classification and
justification for the calcite spectrum. Comparison of
the shapes and positions of the absorption features
with laboratory spectra makes positive identification
of the minerals possible. The 1989 AVIRIS data not
only allow identification of the carbonate-group-
minerals, but permit identification of the individual
species (calcite and dolomite) based upon a 20 nm (2
channel) difference between the position of the main
absorption feature (2.34 vs 2.32 pm). The feature
WAVELENGTH (Micrometers)
Figure 7. Spectra extracted from AVIRIS data for
calcite and dolomite (from Kruse et al.,
1990a).