' positions
Prence of 0.6
«factor of the
which results I
■o the north
ng direction,
ues are in the
duced below
identified and
nised with the
in the digital j
eloped which ■
in all images,
: to determine j
r of cameras
e orientation,
m system into
ng parameters
an. The final
based on the I
of exposure, a
if the relative I
mbyKlemm
including the
ic measuring
a geographic
ns and to add
Atfj /kis>/0010/t$Offto/b*b \ 01/oifOJ/(H)O/O*'»0 im
¡13 j 6
r 'J ,St 1193
lAimehm®«
SthilUpi Stirtfte BotJ-Anlog«n
AHgcmein Balnwnlage
ncm
C£j f
Salzburg
Figure 7: Object Measurement with KiSS and attributes for
geographic information systems
4 EFFICIENCY AND ACCURACY Of KiSS
In a pilot project, the efficiency of the system could be
demonstarted. The aim of the project was to determine the traverse
of the highways and to record the environment, the junctions, traffic
lights, bicycle tracks and noise protection walls in three rural
districts. The measured highways are shown in figure 8.
For this aim 660 km of highways had to be measured in both
directions. The area has an expansion of 50 km times 80 km. The
measurements were carried out in three campaigns of 16 days in
total and two additional days for the evaluation of the
transformation parameters from the GPS system to the local
coordinate frame. One measuring session was fixed to about one
hour of driving. The satellite shadowing caused by villages and
forests were at the most 5 minutes. The rate of failure caused by
strong solar radiation or rain drops on the lenses or hardware
problems were less than 5 %. These sections had to be remeasured.
The object measurement for the determination of intersections and
the environment took less than 40 man-days.
The accuracy of the system was checked with 25 intersections of
different routes. The standard deviation of the two dimensional
position was about 0.6 m. This uncertainty includes the errors of all
sensor calibrations, including the photogrammetric calibration of
the CCD sensors, the errors in the determination of the trajectory as
well as the errors of the object measuring.
Figure 8: Streets and intersections
2-2-5