In: Wagner W., Székely, B. (eds.): ISPRS TC VII Symposium - 100 Years ISPRS, Vienna, Austria, July 5-7, 2010, IAPRS, Vol. XXXVIII, Part 7B
Passive microwave soil moisture evaluations by ground based measurements in Korea
M. Choi®’*, Y-M. Hur a , H. Kim a T.-W. Kim b , J-H. Ahn c
a Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Hanyang University, Seoul, 133-791, Korea -
(mchoi, youml030, k4ecohydro)@hanyang.ac.kr
b Dept, of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Hanyang University, Ansan, 426-791, Korea -
twkim72@hanyang.ac.kr
c Dept. of Civil Engineering, Seokyeong University, Seoul, 136-704, Korea -
wrr@skuniv.ac.kr
Technical Commission VH Symposium 2010
KEY WORDS: Passive Microwave Sensors, AMSR-E, Soil Moisture, MODIS, NDVI, Korea
ABSTRACT:
Passive microwave sensors have many advantages including the ability to directly measured soil moisture at large spatial scales
regardless of weather conditions or time of day. However, microwave-sensed soil moisture’s inevitable limitation is that it cannot
describe hydrology at the watershed because its retrieved soil moisture scale is too large. Thus, microwave-sensed soil moisture
requires validation. Even if there have been great developments for microwave-sensed soil moisture with validation efforts using
ground based measurements and land surface models, the validations of the remotely sensed soil moisture in Korea are very limited.
This study validated Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer E (AMSR-E) soil moisture productions with ground based
measurements at eight sites from rural development administration in Korea. The relationship between AMSR-E soil moisture and
Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) retrieved from Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) for
estimating soil moisture is also investigated. Overall there was a reasonable agreement between the AMSR-E and ground data, but
unreliable replication was found in winter season. More intensive validation efforts should be conducted with other AMSR-E soil
moisture products with vegetation information. This type of estimation provides the utility of the AMSR-E soil moisture products
and MODIS NDVI as an alternative of the ground based measurements and improves soil moisture retrieval algorithms.
1. INTRODUCTION
Fresh water recognized as abundant on our planet is now
drastically becoming a scarce natural resource (Falkenmark and
Rockstrom, 2004). The fresh water resources stress may be
more deteriorated by increasing climate change and population
growth scenarios in the world including East Asia (Milly et al,
2005). To better understanding of fresh water availability linked
between the land surface and the atmosphere, accurate
estimation of the soil moisture is required even if its amount in
water resources systems is relatively small. Soil moisture
determines the partitioning of precipitation into runoff,
infiltration, and surface storage, as well as the partitioning of
incoming solar radiation and long wave radiation into outgoing
long wave radiation, latent heat flux, ground heat flux, and
sensible heat flux (Pachepsky et al., 2003).
Recently, larger spatial scaled mean surface soil moisture is
available from aircraft and satellite instruments comprised of
various active and passive microwave sensors (Schmugge et al.,
2002). The brightness temperature (T B ) as intensity of natural
thermal emission on the land surface was measured by these
passive microwave sensors and surface soil moisture is
successfully retrieved from the T B observations (Jackson et al.,
1995). Even if there are many advantages of monitoring soil
moisture at larger scales including the ability to directly
measurement soil moisture regardless of weather conditions or
time of day (Jackson, 1993; Jackson and Schmugge, 1995), its
inevitable limitations are existing. One of the major limitations
is that it cannot describe hydrology at the watershed or field
scale because its retrieved soil moisture scale is too large
(Mohanty and Skaggs, 2001; Jacobs et al., 2004). Thus,
retrieved soil moisture estimates require validation.
Validation studies for the AMSR-E soil moisture products have
been conducted over different continents, Europe (Wagner et al.,
2007), the United States (McCabe et al., 2005; Crow and Zhan,
2007; Owe et al., 2008; Choi et al., 2008), and Australia (Drape
et al., 2009). Even if AMSR-E evaluation efforts in many
regions around the world to estimate the potential of the
AMSR-E surface soil moisture, there have not been any
evaluation efforts in Korea. This study was conducted for the
initial evaluation of the AMSR-E soil moisture products in
Korea. We used land parameter retrieval model products by
NASA and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (VUA), the
Netherlands following Owe et al. (2001) using ground based
measurements at Korean monitoring network sites.
2. MATERIALS AND METHODS
2.1 Study Region and Ground Data
In order to validate AMSR-E retrieved soil moisture, ground
measured data were obtained from 60 sites with Time Domain
Reflectometry (TDR) in 10 cm depth from rural development
administration in Korea (http://weather.rda.go.kr). Data from
eight sites among the sixty sites were selected (Figure 1).
Dept, of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Hanyang University, Seoul, 133-791, Korea - mchoi@hanyang.ac.kr