In: Wagner W., Szekely, B. (eds.): ISPRS TC VII Symposium - 100 Years ISPRS, Vienna, Austria, July 5-7, 2010,1 APRS, Vol. XXXVIII, Part 7B
247
EOP : pitch [deg] EOP : roll [deg] EOP : ZL [meter]
Figure 6. Platform modeling results, (a): X and Y, (b): Z, (c):
roll, (d): pitch, and (e) yaw
4.4 Georeferencing accuracy
Since the image is monoscopic, the 3D ground restitution
accuracy cannot be analyzed. Therefore, horizontal ground
accuracy is analyzed by projecting image points to the ground
with given ground height information. Each image point is
projected to the ground using the estimated EOPs and the
horizontal accuracy was computed. Table 3 shows the RMSE of
the computed horizontal accuracy. The georeferencing result
was accurate as the RMSE of ground coordinates is less than 1
m, while Gauss-Markov modeling did not accurately estimate
the perspective center positions and attitudes due to correlation
between EOP parameters.
RMSE
X [m]
Y [m]
# of points
0.47
0.16
186
Table 3. Ground accuracy of the modeling
5. CONCLUSION
Airborne HSI systems have shown excellent performance in
many commercial and defence applications. Most of the state-
of-the-art systems are of the pushbroom camera type, and the
georeferencing of these systems heavily relies on the GPS/INS
based direct georeferencing. Under some rare circumstances,
direct georeferencing may not be feasible, such as GPS denied
situations. This study addresses these situations and proposes an
image referenced georeferencing solution for pushbroom
sensors. The approach is based on using high resolution satellite
imagery, and the effort was motivated by the attractive
properties of high-resolution satellite images, including high
geolocation performance and image acquisition capability. The
proposed method utilizes robust image matching, using a
combination of the SURF and RANSAC techniques, and the
platform modeling is based on the Gauss-Markov stochastic
model.
The SURF image matching performance with RANSAC was
tested using simulated images and showed robustness by
successfully mitigating low accuracy matching points. Next, the
pushbroom sensor platform modeling was tested using
simulated EOPs data and ground controls, which were obtained
by simulated image matching. Test results indicated a good
performance potential of the approach by showing high ground
accuracy while EOPs could be estimated moderately.