In: Wagner W., Székely, B. (eds.): ISPRS TC VII Symposium - 100 Years ISPRS, Vienna, Austria, July 5-7, 2010, IAPRS, Vol. XXXVIII, Part 7B
343
with different levels of adjacent illumination sources. For those
conditions various other reflectance quantities are needed
(Martonchik et al, 2000).
t
Nadir
Back
ward
WWltlll J J/////X
WVUU I « J I//////
\\\%V% I I I I 4///✓//
> I * » *///✓✓/
%%%*•***
» » « 4
iff«
IMI IMWW
9 91 immv
Figure 1. Illustration of the view-illumination geometry of trees
in the focal plane of a nadir looking aerial camera. The
flying direction is upwards and Sun is 26° left of it. The
white rectangles depict the nadir and backward viewing
in the ADS40 line sensor, which we used in this study.
Depending on the view and illumination directions, the pixel
can view, in the extreme case of hot-spot geometry, shadow-free
targets. When a tree crown is back-lit, the pixels sample mostly
shadowed targets or forward-scattering canopy elements. The
diffuse light incident at a tree consists of the light scattering in
the atmosphere, but also of light scattered by the adjacent trees
and the background. Taller neighboring trees are both reflectors
that contribute to the incident light, but they also attenuate
hemispherical diffuse light. Multiple scattering by trees contri
butes to the total radiance towards the sensor.
The spectra of a tree in an aerial image are measured from a
sample of pixels that are geometrically linked to the tree. If the
geometry of the canopy is known, it is possible to sample the
crown for the Sun-lit and shaded parts (Korpela, 2004; Larsen
2007)..
There are many sources of inter- and intratree reflectance variat
ion. The varying phenological and physiological status affects
reflectance. Epiphytic lichens, flowers, and cones constitute
sources of variation. The structure of branches, shoots, and
needles, and the whole branching pattern and crown shape vary
between and inside individuals, and the crown structure changes
with age. The functioning, structure, and the environment all in
terrelate in a tree. Structural differences explain largely the va
riation in reflectance and anisotropy.
The scale of observation has important implications. In aerial
images, a crown can be sampled by hundreds of pixels, while in
satellite images several crowns fill a pixel. In sub-meter pixels,
the scale is at the level of branches and shoots. Since bidirectio
nal effects have their origin in sub-pixel shadow casting, it is
possible to observe branch-level anisotropy. Scale is linked with
sensor altitude and the medium. The majority of the atmosphe
ric effects occur below the 3-6 km altitude, which stresses the
importance of atmospheric modeling in airborne images if target
reflectance data is strived for.
The introduction of digital sensors, direct sensor orientation,
and image post processing systems, have all altered photogram-
metric practices. In forest applications, this development has
been covered by the expansion of LiDAR. Digital sensors are
relatively calibrated to a uniform response or absolutely calibra
ted to produce at-sensor radiance (ASR) data. Among photo-
grammetric sensors, absolute calibration exists for the ADS40
line camera. It measures ASR in 4 bands in two directions. A
laboratory calibration is applied throughout a radiometry chain
that also includes radiometric correction methods, which are
implemented in the Leica XPro software (Beisl et al., 2008).
The performance of ADS40 in tree species classification in
Finland was simulated in Heikkinen et al. (2010). An additional
band at 710-725 nm provided the best improvement. With the
original 4 bands, the simulated sp. classification accuracy was
75-79%, while it was up to 85-88%, using the fifth band at the
red-edge.
The aspects of utilizing reflectance anisotropy or calibrated
images in high-resolution RS forest applications are largely
unexplored. Studies have indicated that anisotropy might provi
de additional information for sp. classification (Deering et al.,
1999). Line sensors offer fewer viewing directions, but owing to
their view-geometry (Fig. 1), they sample the reflectance aniso
tropy in ID. This may facilitate the interpretation compared to
frame images. Our overall objective was to explore the ADS40
line camera for tree sp. classification of Scandinavian forests,
where airborne line sensors or airborne calibrated reflectance
data have not been tested thus far. Our three detailed objectives
were as follows.
1. Implement an ADS40 sensor model.
2. Develop a method by which Sun-lit, shaded, camera-
visible, and occluded parts of crowns can be determined
to enable an extraction of image features in different illu
mination classes (Korpela, 2004; Larsen, 2007).
3. Examine the anisotropy and variation of spectral image
features in radiometrically corrected images to study the
performance potential of these data for tree species dis
crimination..
2. MATERIALS AND METHODS
2.1 Study area and reference trees
The experiments were carried out in Hyytiálá, southern Finland
(61°50'N, 24°20'E). The study area extends 2x6 km and com
prises protected and commercial forests. We used reference
trees measured in 2005-2009 in 121, 0.04-1.8-ha plots. The
age of trees was 15-150 years, and a total of 15687 reference
trees were formed by image- or LiDAR-visible trees (visual in
terpretation). Merely 3.8% of the trees had a relative height of
below 0.5. Tree maps were used to derive a proximity class for
each tree, which describes the dominant species among the ad
jacent trees.
2.2 ADS40-SH52 and LiDAR data
The ADS40 flight was carried out on August 23, 2008 at 10-12
local time (7-9 GMT) in 15 strips. Solar elevation was 27°-37°
and there were few clouds during the campaign at 700 m agl.
Reflectance targets and in-situ radiometric measurements were
carried out simultaneously. The strips were flown at 1,2, 3, and
4 km altitudes and multispectral data was recorded for the nadir
(N00A) and backward (B16A) view directions. At 1 and 2 km
only N00A or B16A view was active. Strips were flown mostly
in S-N direction, but also in E-W. We used discrete-return
LiDAR data from 2006-2008 for the tasks of tree crown mo
delling and occlusion determination (section 2.6).