In: Wagner W., Székely, B. (eds.): ISPRS TC VII Symposium - 100 Years ISPRS, Vienna, Austria, July 5-7, 2010, IAPRS, Vol. XXXVIII, Part 7B
CLASSIFICATION OF CLOUDS WITH OBJECT ORIENTED TECHNIQUE
Hamid Azari 3 ’*, AliAkbar Matkan 3 , Alireza Shakiba 3 ’ seyed hossein Pourali 3
3 Remote sensing & GIS Dept., Earth Science Faculty, Shahid Beheshti University,
Tehran, Iran (azari.hamid@gmail.com,a-matkan@sbu.ac.ir, mypauk@yahoo.com, hossainpourali@yahoo.com)
KEY WORDS: Cloud Classification, Segmentation, Object Orient, Texture, Pattern, Bi-spectral, Brightness Temperature
ABSTRACT:
Rainy clouds having high densities are considered as one of the main causes of flood events, therefore detection and classification of
clouds can be very valuable for flood forecasting. In this study NOAA/AVHRR satellite images were used for object oriented
classification. Sixteen bands were produced and utilized for cloud classification. This included the main five bands of
NOAA/AVHRR and other important information such as albedo of band 1 and 2, brightness temperature of band 3,4 and 5, solar
zenith and azimuth angles, land surface temperature, sea surface temperature, normalized difference vegetation index, deviation of
nadir and cloud height. Multi-resolution segmentation followed by bi-spectral technique and hierarchical classification were
performed using the sixteen produced layers. The obtained kappa coefficient and the overall accuracy were relatively high (kappa=
0.887, overall Acc.= 0.905). The results of the study demonstrated that the object oriented classification can be considered as a
proper method for cloud detection and classification.
1. INTRODUCTION
The detection and classification of clouds in meteorological
satellite data with known pixel based approaches is
principally based on spectral analyses and every so often
simple spatial analyses are used additionally. When
classifying structures performed with hundreds of pixels and
relationships between them, these approaches are called
conceptual methods. Object orient classification is a
conceptual method that operates on groups of pixels (image
objects) and defines the relationship between them. There are
two advantages for Cloud classification with object oriented
techniques. First, this approach reduces within-class spectral
variation and generally removes the so-called salt-and-pepper
effects that are typical in pixel-based classification. Second, a
large set of features characterizing objects' spatial, textural,
and contextual properties can be derived as complementary
information to the direct spectral observations to potentially
improve cloud classification accuracy (Liu, D and Xia,F,
2010).
While a number of studies have shown the object-based
classification over land cover and land use mapping
(Lewinski and Zaremski, 2004.; Shattri, et al. 2003; Oruc
et al., 2005; Mathieu and Aryal, 2005; Lara et al 2006;
Volker, 2003) less attention has been paid to its ability to
cloud classification^ Gottsche and Olesen, 2005; haji mir
rahimi and bai, 2008 in persian)
The purpose of this letter is to provide a more complete
evaluation of object-based cloud classification.
spectral channels
Range of electromagnetic
Chi: 0.58-0.68 7m
VIS (visible)
Ch2: 0.725 - 1 7m
NIR (near infrared)
Ch3: 3.55 -3.93 7m
MIR (meddle infrared)
Ch4: 10.5-11.5 7m
TIR (thermal infrared)
Ch5: 11.5- 12.57m
TIR (thermal infrared)
Table 1. Channel of NOAA/AVHRR
2.2. Methods
In this study, we performed the image processing (corrections
and calibrations) and clipping the study area from images,
primarily. Then the cloud classification was applied. Figure 1
is a schematic diagram that illustrates the steps and type of
need data in this study. And Figure 2a and 2b show the
visible and infrared bands respectively.
2. DATA AND METHODS
2.1. Data
In this study the classification of clouds was performed using
low resolution satellite image, NOAA/AVHRR data, that is
taken from northeast of Iran in august of 2005 (NOAA14; 11-
08-2001, 14:16 UTC). It has a spatial resolution about 1.1 km
in nadir and 5 spectral channels with the following
wavelength ranges have shown in table 1.
Corresponding author: hamid azan. M.S. of remote sensing and GIS
address: Remote sensing & GIS Dept., Earth Science Faculty, Shahid Beheshti University, Velenjak St. Tehran, Iran
tel: +982122431787;fax: +982122431788