International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Volume XXXIX-B4, 2012
XXII ISPRS Congress, 25 August - 01 September 2012, Melbourne, Australia
305
HRSC Strip
Date
Nadir Resolution [m]
h2224_0001
2005-10-07
20.9 - 31.6
h2213_0001
2005-10-04
20.5 - 30.4
h8362_0000
2010-07-15
19.8 - 29.2
h2169-0001
2005-09-22
16.3 - 24.3
h5248_0000
2008-02-02
13.7 - 18.7
h5230_0000
2008-01-28
13.3 - 17.5
h5212-0000
2008-01-22
13.1 - 16.3
h2114-0000
2005-09-06
12.2 - 18.7
h2103-0000
2005-09-03
12.0- 15.7
h2081-0000
2005-08-28
11.6- 14.4
h2070_0000
2005-08-25
11.6- 13.7
h2059-0000
2005-08-22
11.6- 13.2
h2037_0000
2005-08-16
12.2 - 12.7
h3193-0000
2006-07-05
13.8- 18.5
h8383_0000
2010-07-21
18.3-28.2
h3160-0000
2006-06-26
13.2- 15.1
h2004_0000
2005-08-06
12.8- 12.6
hi 993-0000
2005-08-03
13.4- 12.5
hi982-0000
2005-07-31
14.8- 12.1
hi 971-0000
2005-07-28
15.5 - 12.4
hi960-0000
2005-07-25
17.2- 12.6
Table 1: HRSC strips used for the block
□ nominal orientation
■ adjusted orientation
20
s 10
Jo 1 „V A X 1 *
jC' . cT> _q>
. «VJ
N?* / V \> / V
HRSC strips
V V V V V
v N> X V V
Figure 7: Mean intersection error before and after single strip
bundle adjustment
For the stability of the complete block the spatial accuracy of tie
points in the overlapping areas is important. Hence for all 20 sub
blocks with an overlapping area the mean intersection error was
calculated using the different orientation data sets (Fig. 8).
For the computation of the complete block as a whole, the number
of tie points for each sub-block was reduced to a target value of
8.000.
160
140
120
1(X)
80
□ nominal orientation
■ strip adjusted orientation
■ block adjusted orientation
HRSC sub-blocks
Figure 8: Mean intersection error for overlapping areas in sub
blocks calculated with different orientation values
(Dumke et al., 2008). For the depicted example of 21 image
strips, the HRSC DTM mosaic is shown in Fig. 10.
Figure 10: Shaded relief of a HRSC DTM mosaic generated with
the block adjusted orientation data
5 CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE WORK
In all but one sub-block the block adjusted orientation data show
a clearly higher accuracy for the HRSC points in the overlapping
area than orientation data adjusted for single strips. In sub-block
h2169-h5248 the overlapping area is too small to find a sufficient
number of tie points. All sub-blocks with a mean intersection
error notably higher than 10m consist of two image strips with
different illumination conditions (Fig. 9).
Overall the adjustment of the exterior orientation in a regional
block does not only provides results with a high internal accu
racy for each strip, but also the relative orientation of the strips is
clearly improved. Additionally the block as a whole is fitted to
a global reference system, the MOLA DTM. The block adjusted
orientation data are the most appropriate ones for the subsequent
derivation of a DTM mosaic or the rectification of ortho-images
The workflow for systematic bundle adjustment of HRSC image
data was used to improve the exterior orientation of single strips
and a regional block. It has been shown that for 2329 single strips
a significant improvement was achieved. A block comprising 21
HRSC strips was simultaneously adjusted and the results were
evaluated to demonstrate the stability of the overlapping areas.
The automated implementation of the workflow and the parallel
processing using the performance of a university computing cen
ter allow to locate stable overlapping areas in all available HRSC
strips in a systematic way. The results of this analysis can be used
to design larger regional blocks. It is also possible to investigate
blocks of strips connected to rings around the equator and if gaps
in the HRSC data are filled with images from other missions a
closed global block completely covering the Martian surface.