920
The International Archives of the Photogrammetry. Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. Vol. XXXVII. Part Bl. Beiiing 2008
2. SMALL SATELLITE MISSIONS: FACTS AND
TRENDS
From figure 1 we can learn that, roughly, the smaller the satel
lite the less the cost and the response time. This is a strong
motivation to try to go for small satellite missions. The IAA
study (Sandau, 2006) presented the state of the art of small
satellite missions and examined more factors that enable one to
produce a cost-effective small satellite mission for Earth obser
vation. It seems, while there are several examples of such mis
sions flying today, the lessons that must be learned in order to
produce cost-effective small sat missions have neither been
universally accepted nor understood by all in the space commu
nity. One of the intentions of that study was to point out how a
potential user can produce a cost effective mission. One of the
key enablers of designing a cost-effective mission is having the
key expertise available. As the number of successfully space-
faring nations grows, the pool of expertise available to meet the
challenges of small mission grows.
2.1 General Facts
Small satellite missions can be achieved by using different
approaches and methods.
Since the advent of modem technologies, small satellites have
also been perceived to offer an opportunity for countries with a
modest research budget and little or no experience in space
technology, to enter the field of space-borne Earth observation
and its applications.
One of the possible approaches is taking full advantage of the
ongoing technology developments leading to further miniaturi
zation of engineering components, development of micro
technologies for sensors and instruments which allow to design
dedicated, well-focused Earth observation missions. At the
extreme end of the miniaturization, the integration of micro
electromechanical systems (MEMS) with microelectronics for
data processing, signal conditioning, power conditioning, and
communications leads to the concept of application specific
integrated micro-instruments (ASIM). These micro- and nano
technologies have led to the concepts of nano- and pico-
satellites, constructed by stacking wafer-scale ASIMs together
with solar cells and antennas on the exterior surface, enabling
the concept of space sensor webs.
The advantages of small satellite missions are:
• more frequent mission opportunities and therefore faster
return of science and for application data
• larger variety of missions and therefore also greater diversi
fication of potential users
• more rapid expansion of the technical and/or scientific
knowledge base
• greater involvement of local and small industry.
After some years of global experience in developing low cost or
cost-effective Earth observation missions, one may break down
the missions into categories like:
Commercial - Requiring a profit to be made from satellite data
or services
• Scientific/Military - Requiring new scientific/military data
to be obtained
• New technology - Developing or demonstrating a new level
of technology
• Competency demonstration - Developing and demonstrat
ing a space systems competency
• Space technology transfer/training - Space conversion of
already competent engineering teams
• Engineering competency growth - Developing engineering
competence using space as a motivation
• Education - Personal growth of students via course projects
or team project participation
Large satellite missions and small satellite missions are consid
ered to be complementary rather than competitive. The large
satellite missions are sometimes even a precondition for cost-
effective approaches.
2.2 Trends
Small satellite missions are supported by several contemporary
trends:
• Advances in electronic miniaturization and associated per
formance capability;
• The recent appearance on the market of new small launchers
(e.g. through the use of modified military missiles to launch
small satellites);
• The possibility of ‘independence’ in space (small satellites
can provide an affordable way for many countries to
achieve Earth Observation and/or defense capability, with
out relying on inputs from the major space-faring nations);
• Ongoing reduction in mission complexity as well as in those
costs associated with management; with meeting safety
regulations etc.;
• The development of small ground station networks con
nected with rapid and cost-effective data distribution meth
ods.
3. APPLICATIONS
3.1 Remote sensing requests
Different remote sensing applications need different approaches
for cost-effective missions. Figures 2 and 3 show the very di
vers requirement coming from the different remote sensing
application fields.
The range of GSD covers centimetres to several hundred meters.
The revisit time ranges from less than one hour to 10 years. The
range of spectral requirements starts with panchromatic only for
topographic mapping and ends with hyperspectral resolution,
for instance in the field of hydrology. Even within the different
application fields, the related subtasks may cover huge areas
again. Figure 4 shows the requirement range for different
coastal applications. In fig. 4 the GSD ranges from meters to
kilometres with revisit times from half an hour to several years.
It is obvious, a satellite system for remote sensing needs to
focus on one of the application fields and within that application
field on a specific task or group of tasks where feasible.