1154
The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. Vol. XXXVII. Part Bl. Beijing 2008
4000
Figure 9. Ground control points distribution in over sampling
Number of points that we have chose in over sampling are 185
GCPs and 120 check points. 3D distribution of ground control
points were shown in figure 9.
Regards to table 5, accuracies of all models are more than
optimum sampling. Other results are the same as optimum
sampling
4000
Figure 10. Ground control points distribution in under sampling
Number of points in under sampling are 60 GCPs and 245
check points. Distribution of GCPs were shown in figure 10.
Results of experiments were reported in table 6. Regards to this
table, accuracies of models are much degraded on check points
respect to over sampling and under sampling but accuracies are
increased on GCPs. Other results are the same as other sampling
cases.
N.O.GCPs
N.O.CKPs
RMSECKPXYZ
(cm)
RMSECNPXYZ
(cm)
lorderRFM(P2^P4)
185
120
4.680
5.505
2orderRFM(P2^P4)
185
120
0.676
0.976
3 orderRFM (P2^P4)
185
120
0.020
0.022
2orderRFM(P2=P4)
185
120
2.150
2.308
3orderRFM(P2=P4)
185
120
0.080
0.086
Inverse 1 orderRFM
(P2#>4)
185
120
60.705
64.281
Inverse 2orderRFM
(P2#P4)
185
120
2.202
2.473
Inverse 3 orderRFM
(P2^P4)
185
120
0.010
0.010
Table 5. Results obtained from aerial data in over sampling
N.O.GCPs
N.O.CKPs
RMSECKPXYZ
(cm)
RMSECNPXYZ
(cm)
lorderRFM(P2^P4)
60
245
14.919
2.890
2orderRFM(P2^P4)
60
245
9.342
0.520
3orderRFM(P2^P4)
60
245
0.613
0.005
2orderRFM(P2=P4)
60
245
18.367
0.990
3orderRFM(P2=P4)
60
245
1.129
0.036
Inverse 1 orderRFM
(?2fP4)
60
245
143.310
17.596
Inverse 2orderRFM
(P2#>4)
60
245
29.040
0.980
Inverse 3orderRFM
(P2^P4)
60
245
0.431
0.004
Table 6. Results obtained from aerial data in under sampling
First order rational functions error vectors of X, Y and Z
elements in optimum sampling, oyer sampling and under
sampling were shown in figure 11 and 12. Some of these
vectors were eliminated to the figures be more obvious. For
aerial data like simulated data, rational functions’ errors in Z
direction are much more than X and Y directions for all three
sampling cases but the amounts of errors in X and Y directions
are the same. As can be seen, maximum error is high but by
regards prvious tables, check points average errors of first order