The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. Vol. XXXVII. Part Bl. Beijing 2008
alignment (instrument boresight) and pixel boresight (look
angles/line-of-sight vectors of individual pixels), where both
types of measurement are given for a range of temperatures to
be expected under on-orbit conditions. In-flight geometric
validation will periodically assess the possible change of these
geometric parameters during satellite life time. This will be
done via automatic image matching using orthoimages of
superior quality of certain test sites. Test sites should be
selected according to the stability of land-use patterns (arid
regions with sufficient texture preferred). If the resulting shift
vectors are larger than a given threshold or if they show a
systematic behavior, it can be concluded that an update of the
values for the geometric calibration parameters is necessary.
Band-to-band registration of the VNIR and SWIR detectors can
be checked via the channels of the radiometric overlap region of
the two detectors. Image matching will be used to derive the
shift vector pattern and corresponding statistics. The update of
geometric instrument model parameters can be done via bundle
adjustment using ground control points, which will be extracted
via automatic image matching as mentioned before (see section
3.3). A generalized sensor model comprising e.g. focal length,
principal point coordinates, sensor rotation, and sensor
curvature of a geometric sensor array will be used. The initial
parameters of this sensor model are derived from laboratory
calibration (respectively, from corresponding valid geometric
calibration values). Additionally, instrument/attitude boresight
matrices will be estimated.
5. CONCLUSIONS
The efficient processing as well as the calibration and
validation strategies are presented, which will be implemented
for the future spacebome hyperspectral imager EnMAP
(Environmental Mapping and Analysis Program). Namely, it is
pointed out
• how the high-level EnMAP products (including geometric
and/or atmospheric correction) will be derived by the fully
automated processing chain,
• how the high accuracy for these EnMAP products will be
achieved over the whole mission’s lifetime by the
calibration and validation activities, and
• how all these components interact.
REFERENCES
Bachmann, M.; Habermeyer, M.; Holzwarth, S.; Richter, R.;
Müller, A. (2007): Including Quality'Measures in an Automated
Processing Chain for Airborne Hyperspectral Data. In:
EARSeL Workshop on Imaging Spectroscopy, Bruges, Belgium.
Habermeyer, M.; Müller, A.; Holzwarth, S.; Richter, R.; Müller,
R.; Bachmann, M.; Seitz, K.-H.; Seifert, P.; Strobl, P. (2005):
Implementation of the Automatic Processing Chain for ARES.
In: EARSeL Workshop on Imaging Spectroscopy, Warsaw,
Poland.
Heege, T.; Kisselev, V.; Miksa, S.; Pinnel, N.; Häse, C. (2005):
Mapping Aquatic Systems with a Physically Based Process
Chain. In: SPIE Ocean Optics, Fremantle, Australia.
Kaufmann, H.; Segl, K.; Chabrillat, S.; Hofer, S.; Stuffier, T.;
Müller, A.; Richter, R.; Schreier, G.; Haydn, R.; Bach, H.
(2006): A Hyperspectral Sensor for Environmental Mapping
and Analysis. In: IGARSS Space Hyperspectral Sensors,
Denver, CO, USA.
Lehner, M. and Gill, R. S. (1992): Semi-automatic derivation of
digital elevation models from stereoscopic 3-line scanner data,
In: IAPRS 29 (Part B4), Washington, DC, USA.
Müller, A.; Kaufmann, H.; Hofer, S.; Chlebek, C.; Richter, R.;
Gredel, J.; Segl, K.; Förster, K.-P. (2006): Instrument
Requirements, Data Processing, and Mission Scenarios for the
German Hyperspectral mission EnMAP (Environmental
Mapping and Analysis Program). In: ARSPC Keynote,
Canberra, Australia.
Müller, R.; Krauß, T.; Lehner, M.; Reinartz, P. (2007):
Automatic Production of European Orthoimage Coverage
within the GMES Land Fast Track Service using SPOT 4/5 and
IRS-P6 LISS III Data. In: ISPRS Hannover Workshop High
Resolution Earth Imaging for Geospatial Information, Hannover,
Germany.
Müller, R.; Lehner, M.; Reinartz, P.; Schroeder, M. (2005):
Evaluation of Spaceborne and Airborne Line Scanner Images
using a Generic Ortho Image Processor. In: ISPRS Hannover
Workshop High Resolution Earth Imaging for Geospatial
Information, Hannover, Germany.
Richter, R. (1996): A spatially adaptive fast atmospheric
correction algorithm. International Journal of Remote Sensing,
17(6), pp. 1201-1214.
Richter, R. (1998): Correction of satellite imagery over
mountainous terrain. Applied Optics, 37(18), pp. 4004-4015.
Schroeder, M.; Poutier, L.; Müller, R.; Dinguirard, M.; Reinartz,
P.; Briottet, X. (2001): Intercalibration of optical satellites -
and case study with MOMS and SPOT. Aerospace Science and
Technology, 5(4), pp. 305-315.
Schwarzer, H.; Gerasch, B.; Neumann, A.; Sümnich, K.-H.;
Walzel, T.; Zimmermann, G. (2003): Resume of 7 years MOS
in-orbit calibration - events, effects and explanations. In: SPIE
Earth Observing Systems, San Diego, CA, USA.
Schwarzer, H.; Sümnich, K.-H.; Zimmermann, G.; Neumann,
A.; Walzel, T. (1998): Experiences and Results of Long-Term
In-orbit Sun Calibration and Modular Optoelectronical
Scanner (MOS) on the Indian IRS-P3 Mission. In: SPIE
European Symposium on Remote Sensing, Barcelona, Spain.
Stuffier, T.; Kaufmann, C.; Hofer, S.; Förster, K.-P.; Schreier,
G.; Mueller, A.; Eckardt, A.; Bach, H.; Penné, B.; Benz, U.;
Haydn, R. (2007): The EnMAP hyperspectral imager—An
advanced optical payload for future applications in Earth
observation programmes. Acta Astronautica, 61(1-6), pp. 115-
120.
Teillet, P. M.; Fedosejevs, G.; Gauthier, R. P.; O'Neill, N. T.;
Thome, K. J.; Biggar, S. F.; Ripley, H.; Meygret, A. (2001): A
generalized approach to the vicarious calibration of multiple
Earth observation sensors using hyperspectral data. Remote
Sensing of Environment, 77(3), pp. 304-327.
Van der Meer, F. D. and De Jong, S. M. (Eds.) (2006): Imaging
Spectrosmetry - Basic Principles and Prospective Applications.
Springer, The Netherlands.
1270