î SUltof the fact
in this
? 82)firs > propose
me N. Let the
v Motion 2
nes s” in the space
n Ae context of a
“PU 1 *]. ^
i® 1 *. averaged
se ' of all training
^ire segmentation
O' and parameter
iew ), we obtained
fware packages:
and ASTRO
and export the
at. In total, 150
, smoothness and
1,0.3,0.5,0.7,
ing the resultant
-e computed the
using JTS
and GeoTools
s and trucks) as
ig rooftops for a
ining object sets
we computed
ach combination
I examined the
objects inland
lentation results
alts are reported
training objfl*
ri-A tahflVlOf 01
ter variation
The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. Vol. XXXVII. Part B4. Beijing 2008
a. Vehicles, average of all segments in Y*
c. Buildings, average of all segments in Y*
e. Trees, average of all segments in Y*
overSegmentation
b. Vehicles, average of training objects
0.4 0.6 0.8
overSegmentation
d. Buildings, average of training objects
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
overSegmentation
f. Trees, average of training objects
g. Average of all segments in Y* for all
training objects
Figure 1. The segmentation results when averaged overly E Yf,
V if. ASTRO = □, eCognition = ♦.
I "nringwlÉil