The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. Vol. XXXVII. Part B4. Beijing 2008 
calculated for all observations receive for PAN: -0.11 and for 
RGB: 0.02. Standard deviation is respectively: 0.23 and 0.17. 
0.60 
□ PAN 
■ RGB 
Figure 4 Relation between relative area error [%] and its 
frequency (histogram of errors for all data). 
Table 1. Accuracy analysis PAN - repeatability, reproducibility 
and RRMS 
Table 2. Accuracy analysis RGB - repeatability, reproducibility 
and RRMS 
Table 3. Accuracy analysis PAN - bias (A), standard deviation 
(8), reproducibility (a rep rod) and RRMS 
Test 
area 
no 
Référé 
nee 
area 
[m 2 ] 
A 
(mean obs.- 
ref. area) 
[%] 
8 
(mean.) 
[%] 
^reprod 
ref. area 
[%] 
RRMS 
(ref. 
area) 
[%] 
1 
23103 
0.126 
0.118 
0.105 
0.180 
2 
14805 
-0.026 
0.184 
0.114 
0.168 
3 
52925 
-0.025 
0.069 
0.060 
0.070 
4 
51194 
-0.001 
0.058 
0.056 
0.054 
5 
19350 
-0.051 
0.117 
0.097 
0.113 
6 
25664 
0.151 
0.102 
0.105 
0.180 
mean. 
0.029 
0.108 
0.089 
0.127 
Reference 
area 
Ggroup 
iTrepet 
^reprod 
^reprod 
RRMS 
[m 2 ] 
[m 2 ] 
[m 2 ] 
[m 2 ] 
ref. area 
[%] 
(ref. area) 
[%] 
23103 
3022 
1952 
3598 
0.156 
0.236 
14805 
1922 
2019 
2787 
0.188 
0.248 
52925 
5669 
3675 
6756 
0.128 
0.208 
51194 
5284 
2718 
5942 
0.116 
0.246 
19350 
1376 
1096 
1759 
0.091 
0.178 
25664 
2268 
2134 
3114 
0.121 
0.180 
mean 
0.133 
0.216 
Reference 
area 
^group 
Qrepet 
^reprod 
*Teprod 
RRMS 
[m 2 ] 
[m 2 ] 
[m 2 ] 
[m 2 ] 
ref. area 
[%] 
(ref. area) 
[%] 
23103 
2105 
1212 
2429 
0.105 
0.180 
14805 
1235 
1142 
1683 
0.114 
0.168 
52925 
2091 
2395 
3179 
0.060 
0.070 
51194 
1840 
2194 
2863 
0.056 
0.054 
19350 
1528 
1097 
1881 
0.097 
0.113 
25664 
2037 
1754 
2688 
0.105 
0.180 
mean 
0.089 
0.127 
Test 
area 
no 
Referenc 
e area 
[m 2 ] 
A 
(mean 
obs.- ref. 
area) 
[%] 
8 
(mean.) 
[%] 
^reprod 
RRMS 
(ref. 
area) 
[%] 
ref. area 
[%] 
1 
23103 
-0.163 
0.212 
0.156 
0.236 
2 
14805 
0.131 
0.194 
0.188 
0.248 
3 
52925 
-0.167 
0.159 
0.128 
0.208 
4 
51194 
-0.234 
0.139 
0.116 
0.246 
5 
19350 
0.115 
0.128 
0.091 
0.178 
6 
25664 
-0.152 
0.117 
0.121 
0.180 
mean 
0.158 
0.133 
0.216 
Table 4. Accuracy analysis RGB - bias (A), standard deviation 
(8), reproducibility (a re prod) and RRMS 
PAN 
• ISO 
■ RMS 
10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000 
area [sq m] 
Figure 5 Relation between relative area error, RRMS [%] and 
test area [ sq m], PAN 
RGB 
ISO 
I RMS 
Figure 6 Relation between relative area error, RRMS [%] and 
test area [ sq m], RGB 
Figure 7 Relation between relative area error RRMS [%] and 
area 
[sq m], PAN, RGB (in simulated Landsat pixels, 30m) 
1332 
Sipgli