Full text: Proceedings; XXI International Congress for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (Part B5-2)

The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. Vol. XXXVII. Part B5. Beijing 2008 
944 
(a) Without (b) With 
Figure 12. Range image without and with amplitude threshold 
A test on amplitude threshold was conducted with various 
integration times using the grey flat target and the estimated 
distance with the nominal distance of the target to the range 
camera of lm. We observed a little effect on the measurement 
precision, i.e. the standard deviation of the residual, by 
amplitude threshold. However, in terms of its accuracy, 
amplitude threshold provided a better measurement accuracy as 
shown in Figure 13. 
■♦—without amplitude thr. —I with amplitude thr. 
Figure 13. Estimated distance with and without amplitude 
threshold vs. Integration time 
CONCLUDING REMARKS 
Metric performance of a 3D range camera, SwissRanger SR- 
3000, was extensively evaluated in terms of its precision and its 
hardware setting values such as warming-up time, integration 
time and amplitude threshold. 
We reported that a large variation in the measurement precision 
within the distance of an object to the camera smaller than 
70cm. In addition, in the case of a distance greater than 1.75m, 
the integration time of 30ms provides a maximum of 1cm 
precision. However, note that all the experiments in this paper 
were conducted with a flat target, not with general objects. In 
addition, we recommend users to use a photogrammetric 
calibration method to remove a lens distortion effect as shown 
in Figure 6, which will be our future works on this new 
photogrammetry tool. 
A simple Matlab-GUI SwissRanger Interface program used in 
this paper is freely available for research-related works. If any 
one is interested, please contact either Kwang-Ho Bae or 
Christoph Weyer. 
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 
This work has been in part supported by the Cooperative 
Research Centre for Spatial Information, whose activities are 
funded by the Australian Commonwealth's Cooperative 
Research Centres Programme. The first author thanks to The 
Institute for Geoscience Research (TIGeR) at Curtin University 
of Technology for a travel grant. 
We thanks to Mr David Belton for his assistance on a diploma 
project by C. Weyer and an undergraduate project by K. Lim. 
We would like to thank Department of Spatial Sciences at 
Curtin University of Technology, Institut für Photogrammetrie 
und Fernerkundung at Universität Karlsruhe and Prof. Dr.-Ing. 
Maria Hennes. 
REFERENCES 
Büttgen, B., T. Oggier, M. Lehmann, R. Kaufmann, and F. 
Lustenberger, 2005. CCD/CMOS Lock-In Pixel for Range 
Imaging: Challenges, Limitations and State-of-the-Art. In: 
Proceedings of 1 st Range Imag. Res. Day, pp. 21-32. 
Gordon, S. J., 2005. Structural deformation measurement using 
terrestrial laser scanners, PhD thesis, Department of Spatial 
Sciences, Curtin University of Technology, 229 pages. 
Kahlmann, T., Remondino, F. and Ingensand, H., 2006. 
Calibration for increased accuracy of the range imaging camera 
swissranger. In: Proceedings of the ISPRS Commission V 
Symposium 'Image Engineering and Vision Metrology', 
Dresden, Germany 
Karel, W., P. Dominger, and N. Pfeifer, 2007. In situ 
determination of range camera quality parameters by 
segmentation, In: Proceedings of International Conference on 
Optical 3-D Measurement Techniques, pp. 109-116. 
Lange, R., 2000. 3D Time-of-flight distance measurement with 
custom solid state image sensors in CMOS/CCD-technology, 
University of Siegen, Department of Electrical Engineering and 
Computer Science, Germany 
Mesa Imaging, 2008. http://www.mesa-imaging.ch/, accessed 
on March, 2008. 
Oggier, T., M. Lehmann, R. Kaufmann, M. Schweizer, M. 
Richter, P. Metzler, G. Lang, F. Lustenberger and N. Blanc. 
2003. An all-solid-state optical range camera for 3D real-time 
imaging with sub-centremeter depth resolution (SwissRanger), 
In: Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 5249, pp. 534-545. 
Oggier, T., B. Büttgen, F. Lustenberger, G. Becker, B. Rügg, 
and A. Hodac. 2005. SwissRanger SR3000 and First 
Experiences based on Miniaturized 3D-TOF Cameras, In: 
Proceedings of 1 st Range Imag. Res. Day, pp. 97-108. 
Weingarten J., G. Gruener and R. Siegwart, 2004. A state-of- 
the-art 3D sensor for robot navigation, In: Proceedings of the 
IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and 
Systems, pp. 2155-2160.
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.