The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. Vol. XXXVII. Part B5. Beijing 2008
944
(a) Without (b) With
Figure 12. Range image without and with amplitude threshold
A test on amplitude threshold was conducted with various
integration times using the grey flat target and the estimated
distance with the nominal distance of the target to the range
camera of lm. We observed a little effect on the measurement
precision, i.e. the standard deviation of the residual, by
amplitude threshold. However, in terms of its accuracy,
amplitude threshold provided a better measurement accuracy as
shown in Figure 13.
■♦—without amplitude thr. —I with amplitude thr.
Figure 13. Estimated distance with and without amplitude
threshold vs. Integration time
CONCLUDING REMARKS
Metric performance of a 3D range camera, SwissRanger SR-
3000, was extensively evaluated in terms of its precision and its
hardware setting values such as warming-up time, integration
time and amplitude threshold.
We reported that a large variation in the measurement precision
within the distance of an object to the camera smaller than
70cm. In addition, in the case of a distance greater than 1.75m,
the integration time of 30ms provides a maximum of 1cm
precision. However, note that all the experiments in this paper
were conducted with a flat target, not with general objects. In
addition, we recommend users to use a photogrammetric
calibration method to remove a lens distortion effect as shown
in Figure 6, which will be our future works on this new
photogrammetry tool.
A simple Matlab-GUI SwissRanger Interface program used in
this paper is freely available for research-related works. If any
one is interested, please contact either Kwang-Ho Bae or
Christoph Weyer.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This work has been in part supported by the Cooperative
Research Centre for Spatial Information, whose activities are
funded by the Australian Commonwealth's Cooperative
Research Centres Programme. The first author thanks to The
Institute for Geoscience Research (TIGeR) at Curtin University
of Technology for a travel grant.
We thanks to Mr David Belton for his assistance on a diploma
project by C. Weyer and an undergraduate project by K. Lim.
We would like to thank Department of Spatial Sciences at
Curtin University of Technology, Institut für Photogrammetrie
und Fernerkundung at Universität Karlsruhe and Prof. Dr.-Ing.
Maria Hennes.
REFERENCES
Büttgen, B., T. Oggier, M. Lehmann, R. Kaufmann, and F.
Lustenberger, 2005. CCD/CMOS Lock-In Pixel for Range
Imaging: Challenges, Limitations and State-of-the-Art. In:
Proceedings of 1 st Range Imag. Res. Day, pp. 21-32.
Gordon, S. J., 2005. Structural deformation measurement using
terrestrial laser scanners, PhD thesis, Department of Spatial
Sciences, Curtin University of Technology, 229 pages.
Kahlmann, T., Remondino, F. and Ingensand, H., 2006.
Calibration for increased accuracy of the range imaging camera
swissranger. In: Proceedings of the ISPRS Commission V
Symposium 'Image Engineering and Vision Metrology',
Dresden, Germany
Karel, W., P. Dominger, and N. Pfeifer, 2007. In situ
determination of range camera quality parameters by
segmentation, In: Proceedings of International Conference on
Optical 3-D Measurement Techniques, pp. 109-116.
Lange, R., 2000. 3D Time-of-flight distance measurement with
custom solid state image sensors in CMOS/CCD-technology,
University of Siegen, Department of Electrical Engineering and
Computer Science, Germany
Mesa Imaging, 2008. http://www.mesa-imaging.ch/, accessed
on March, 2008.
Oggier, T., M. Lehmann, R. Kaufmann, M. Schweizer, M.
Richter, P. Metzler, G. Lang, F. Lustenberger and N. Blanc.
2003. An all-solid-state optical range camera for 3D real-time
imaging with sub-centremeter depth resolution (SwissRanger),
In: Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 5249, pp. 534-545.
Oggier, T., B. Büttgen, F. Lustenberger, G. Becker, B. Rügg,
and A. Hodac. 2005. SwissRanger SR3000 and First
Experiences based on Miniaturized 3D-TOF Cameras, In:
Proceedings of 1 st Range Imag. Res. Day, pp. 97-108.
Weingarten J., G. Gruener and R. Siegwart, 2004. A state-of-
the-art 3D sensor for robot navigation, In: Proceedings of the
IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and
Systems, pp. 2155-2160.