Figure 6. Statistics of land surface temperature on July 6, 2004
and December 3, 2006
4.3 Seasonal change in net radiation
As a primary parameter in land surface processes, the seasonal
variation of albedo was an important factor for causing the
difference in the radiation budgets. From summer to winter,
there were prominent decreases in albedo over all surfaces.
While water decreased about 4.14%, other surfaces reduced by
18.40%~36.47%. Decrease of albedo enhanced the ability to
absorb the total incoming radiation. On the other hand, the
amount of the incoming irradiance reaching the ground
decreased dramatically in the winter, which was determined by
solar elevation angle (SEA). When Landsat-5 passed on July 6,
2004, SEA was 62.96°, and the measured total incoming
radiation was 872.22W/m 2 ; while SEA decreased to 25.79° and
the incoming radiation to 375.00 W/m 2 on December 3, 2006. It
can be concluded that the changes in albedo and solar
irradiance led to the change in radiation budgets, but the latter
played a more important role.
Longwave emission is controlled by land surface temperature.
In the winter, because the energy absorbed by land surfaces
decreased significantly, land surface temperature decreased
accordingly. The longwave emission in the winter was only
about 33.22%~ 40.76% of that in the summer. However, the
different between the shortwave net radiation flux and the
longwave emission decrease largely in winter compared with
that in summer. It should be noted that, the heat island and cool
land caused by the thermal inertia (Wang et al, 2007), play an
importance role in the spatial patterns of net radiation fluxes in
summer and winter. As a result, the city turned into a “plateau”
in the net radiation map of the winter from a “basin” of the
summer.
It is important to investigate the radiation budgets over urban
and suburban surfaces for urban climate research. In this paper,
the applicability and feasibility of Landsat-5 TM images in
conjunction with meteorological data were investigated to
estimate the radiation budgets in Beijing, China. Validation
using in situ measurements suggests that the estimation
accuracy for the net radiation was acceptable. It is concluded
that satellite remote sensing can be used as an effective
technique to improve modeling and analysis of the spatial
patterns of surface energy balance for a mega-city such as
Beijing.
It is found that the net radiation in Beijing has unique features
with spatial distribution. In the summer, urban area was the
“basin” in the distribution map of the net radiation flux, while
transferred to the “plateau” in the winter. Concentric patterns
can be seen in the map of the radiation flux in both the summer
and the winter. This interesting phenomenon can be explained
by the distribution of albedo and land surface temperature in
urban and suburban areas. The seasonal variations of radiation
budgets were also investigated. From summer to winter, the
decrease in the shortwave net radiation and the net radiation
were mainly controlled by the change in solar elevation angle.
REFERENCES
Bisht, G., Venturini, V., Islam, S., et al., 2005. Estimation of
the net radiation using MODIS (Moderate Resolution Imaging
Spectroradiometer) data for clear sky days. Remote Sensing of
Environment, 97, pp. 52-67.
Chander, G., Markham, B., 2003. Revised Landsat-5 TM
radiometric calibration procedures and postcalibration dynamic
ranges. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing,
41, pp. 2674-2677.
Chrysoulakis, N., 2003. Estimation of the all-wave urban
surface radiation balance by use of ASTER multispectral
imagery and in situ spatial data. Journal of Geophysical
Research, 108, 4582, doi: 10.1029/2003JD003396.
Frey, C., Rigo, G., Parlow, E., 2007. Urban radiation balance of
two coastal cities in a hot and dry environment. International
Journal of Remote Sensing, 28, pp. 2695-2712.
Kato, S., Yamaguchi, Y., 2005. Analysis of urban heat-island
effect using ASTER and ETM+ data: separation of
anthropogenic heat discharge and natural heat radiation from
sensible heat flux. Remote Sensing of Environment, 99, pp. 44-
54.
204