The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. Vol. XXXVII. Part B7. Beijing 2008
196
dewatering plan. The critical details of where ground surface
deformation might develop however can never be fully foreseen.
In this study, InSAR integrated with groundwater pumping, site
geologic and soil data was used to demonstrate its capability for
ground surface deformation and EIA studies in and around an
on-going open-pit Pipeline mine with intensive dewatering
operations for the period 1996-2001.
Although, the magnitude and temporal occurrence of land
subsidence for the study area are not well known; data been
sparse and accuracy varying, the InSAR-generated images,
clearly demonstrate the capability of InSAR in successfully
detecting subsidence and uplift at the very least to an accuracy
of a few centimeter using the 35-day repeat SAR data and radar
interferometric techniques under favourable environmental
conditions. We assume, the high percentage of fine clay soil,
classified as hydro-sensitive and known to exhibit shrink and
swell characteristics underlying most of the mine area added to
the groundwater pumping of such magnitude to induce
subsurface volumetric shrinkage resulting in land subsidence.
The fact that fringes in this area are only evident from the post-
1996 InSAR pairs also suggest the most probable source of
horizontal strains to be differential subsidence resulting from
ongoing mine dewatering of the alluvial aquifer.
The results of the integration of multi-temporal differential
InSAR with Landsat TM, ASTER including groundwater
pumping, rock and soil data in a GIS also provide evidences that
InSAR can offer a relatively inexpensive means of assessing the
environmental impact of dewatering driven effects around on
going open-pit mine site and surroundings with a potential time
lag of less than six months to a year. We hope our example
study makes the wider remote sensing community more aware
of the InSAR method’s capabilities in dewatering applications.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This work was supported by the Arthur Brant Laboratory for
Exploration Geophysics, University of Nevada Reno. The
European Space Agency ERS 1/2 raw SAR scenes were
provided through the Western North American InSAR
(WInSAR) research consortium. ERS 1 /2 satellite orbits were
obtained from the Delft Institute for Earth-Oriented Space
Research, The Netherlands. The 1996-2004 Electronic copies of
the groundwater pumped to the infiltration were received from
the Nevada Division of Water Resources. JPL’s ROI PAC
Research Interferometry package was used to prepare the
interferograms.
REFERENCES
References from Journals:
Amelung, F., Galloway, D.L., Bell, J.W., Zebker, H.A. and
Laczniak, R.J., 1999. Sensing the ups and downs of Las Vegas:
INSAR reveals structural control of land subsidence and
aquifer-system deformation. Geology, 27(6), pp.483-486.
Fielding, E.J., Blom, R.G. & Goldstein, R.M., 1998. Rapid
subsidence over oil fields measured by SAR interferometry.
Geophysical Research Letters, 25, pp. 3215-3218.
Galloway, D.L., Hudnut, K.W., Ingebritsen, S.E., Philips, S.P.,
Peltzer, G., Rogez, F. & Rosen, P.A., 1998. Detection of aquifer
system compaction and land subsidence using interferometric
synthetic aperture radar, Antelope Valley, Mojave Desert,
California. Water Resources Research, 34, pp. 2573-2585.
Hoffmann, J., Zebker, H.A., Galloway, D.L. and Amelung, F.,
2001. Seasonal subsidence and rebound in Las Vegas Valley,
Nevada, observed by synthetic aperture radar interferometry.
Water Resources Research, 37, pp. 1551-1566.
Massonnet, D., Holzer, T. & Vadon, H., 1997. Land subsidence
caused by the East Mesa Geothermal Field, California, observed
using SAR interferometry. Geophysical Research Letters, 24,
pp. 901-904.
Woldai, Tsehaie, Oppliger, Gary and Taranik, Jim, 2008.
Monitoring dewatering induced subsidence and fault
reactivation using InSAR, International Journal of Remote
Sensing (in Press).
Wright, P. & Stow, R., 1999. Detecting mining subsidence
from Space. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 20, pp.
1183-1188.
Zebker, H.A., and Goldstein, R.M., 1986. Topographic mapping
from interferometric synthetic aperture radar observations.
Journal of Geophysical Research, 91(B5), pp. 4993-4999.
References from Other Litreature:
AMEC, 2004. Summary of risk assessment, ground subsidence
and earth fissure evaluation, Pipeline/South Pipeline Project,
Cortez Gold Mines, Lander County, Nevada (January 7, 2004),
USA.
Bureau of Land Management, 2000a. South Pipeline final
Environmental Impact Statement, Battle Mountain Field Office,
Battle Mountain, Nevada (February 2000), USA.
2002a. Pipeline/South Pipeline heap leach facility in
the South Pipeline Project, Final EIS, Battle Mountain District
Office, Battle Mountain, Nevada, USA.
2004. Pipeline/South Pipeline Pit Expansion Project,
Final Supplemental Environmental Impacts Statement
(December 2004), Battle Mountain Field Office, Nevada, USA.
Chang, Hsing-Chung, Ge Linlin, Rizos Chris, 2004.
Environmental Impact Assessment of Mining Subsidence by
Using Spacebome Radar Interferometry, 3rd FIG Regional
Conference, Jakarta, Indonesia, October 3-7, 2004, 13 pp.
Geomega. 2002a. Pipeline / South Pipeline Pit Expansion
Project Baseline Characterization Report. Prepared for Cortez
Gold Mines. September 13, 2002.
McCusker, Robert T. (2004). Geological Policy Document on
the Robertson Property, Lander County,Nevada, U.S.A.,
Prepared for Coral Gold Corporation.
Parsons Brinckerhoff, 2005. Carlin Corridor Impact Assessment,
submitted to Lander County (April 2005), Nevada, USA.
Ponce, D. A., (1997). Gravity Data of Nevada, U.S. Department
of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey Digital Data Series Dds-
42, Menlo Park, California
U.S. Department of Interior (1999). South pipeline project draft
environmental impact statement, NV 64-93-00IP (96-2A), NV