Full text: Proceedings; XXI International Congress for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (Part B7-1)

The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. Vol. XXXVII. Part B7. Beijing 2008 
455 
changing information of the five crops canopy reflectance is 
similar with others’ work. 
2002 Early №ce 2002 Late Rice 
2004 Rap« 
2003 Maze 
2003 cotton 
2004 cotton 
2003 Rice 
2004 Rape 
Wavelengtti /pm 
2003 Cotton 
2001 Winter Wheat 
2004 Cotton 
Wavelength /pm 
2004 Winter 'Wheat 
2004 Winter Wheat 
05 ).o t s 
Wavelength /pm 
Figure 1: Statistical analysis of crop leaf reflectance 
2003 Maàze 
Figure 2: Statistical analysis of crop canopy reflectance 
I Forest 
Water 
Unused 
Winter wheat 
Summer Maize 
City 
Figure 3: Study area classification map 
Baret and Guyot put forward a semi-empirical regression 
function between VI and LAI, as shown in Equation (2) 
VI = VI ж -(VI X - VI g )exp(~K VI LAI) (2) 
where VI w is the asymptotically limiting value of a specific VI 
when LAI approaches a very large value; VI g is the index value 
corresponding to bare soil conditions (LAI = 0). The dynamic 
range of the VI (i.e., VI^ -VI g ) is the difference between its 
maximum ( VI) and minimum value (VI g ). K V i is the 
absorption-scattering coefficient that determines the sensitivity 
of the VI to a unit increase of LAI (Baret, F. 1991). 
4.2 “Beijing-1” LAI image 
Table 1 lists the linear and non-linear regression functions 
between LAI and several Vis created by spectral reflectance in 
broad red and near IR bands of winter wheat. The best linear 
regression function is the relationship between RVI and LAI 
(R 2 =0.939), while the best non-linear regression function was 
relationship between SAVI and LAI (R 2 =0.0.678). The 
parameters in different VI are: PVI (a=0.96916, b=0.084726), 
SAVI (L=0.5). 
Table 2 lists the semi-empirical regression function between 
LAI and VI created with broad red and near IR bands of winter 
wheat. The best semi-empirical regression function is between 
SAVI and LAI. However, the L parameter of SAVI is simplified 
to 0.5, we couldn’t prove its applicability for the “Beijing-1” 
images, and then we just used the NDVI instead since the 
NDVI-LAI relationship is the best in relationships between 
RVI-LAI, PVI-LAI and MSAVI-LAI except SAVI-LAI 
relationship. 
With the same method, we got the semi-empirical regression 
functions for summer maize, grass and forest. The datasets of
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.