The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. Vol. XXXVII. Part B7. Beijing 2008
For the ASTER scene used in our study (collected on
11/24/2001) the sun information checked from ASTER HDF
head file was as follows:
Sun elevation:40.902706( complementary angle of zenith)
Sun azimuth: 161.336042
The images before and after C-correction were showed in Fig.2.
furthermore, the spectral profiles along a random line across
mountain area in the before and after C-correction ASTER
image were also given in Fig.3.(two random lines shared the
same location and distribution).
With the sun information listed above, combining the aspect and
slope calculated from DEM (section 3.1),the C-correction was
applied to ASTER data with 9 bands processed in section 3.1.
Figure 2 ASTER images of pre-C corrected (a) and post-C corrected (b) (bands 132 for RGB)
100 200 _ 300
Line
400
band I bic. i band2
I ’
I
100 200 . 300 400
Line
3000
9)
I 2000
>
1000
bandl — band: band2
c>)
Figure 3 Spectral profiles along a random line across mountain area in the pre-C (a) and post-C (b)corrected ASTER image (two
random lines shared the same location and distribution).
3.3 Linear spectral mixture model
When using LSMM, the spectra signals of a pixel are expressed
linear combination of finite number of endmembers weighted
by their abundances. According to the restriction on abundances,
a number of approaches have been developed to analyze
LSMM(Ichoku & Kamieli, 1996), such as unconstrained
method, augmented matrix method, sum-to-one constrained
method and full constrained method(Xin Miao et al,2006),
where the augmented matrix method and the sum-to one
constrained method confine the sums of endmember
abundances to be one or close to one (Smith et al., 1990), and
he fully constrained method further requires the endmember
abundances to be positive (Brown et al., 1999, 2000;
GarciaHaro et al., 1996; Settle&Drake, 1993;Shimabukuro &
Smith, 1991), here we chose the fully constrained LSMM, and
the basic algorithms for a pixel were as follows:
n
Li A. ^ ' fkiRkX + £ iA subject to
k = 1
n
X f ki = * and f ki ~ 0 (4)
k = 1