The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. Vol. XXXVII. Part B7. Beijing 2008
(b)
Figure 3. Original HSR and LSR images of Quickbird. (a)
HSR image, (b) RGB false-colour composition 4, 3 and 2 of
LSR (resampled at 0.7 m)
RGB compositions of the fused images formed by three fusion
methods are shown in Fig. 4. From original images and fusion
results (Fig. 3, Fig. 4), the spectral characteristics of SFIM-
fused or DWT-fused images is almost the same with original
LSR images (Fig. 3(b), Fig. 4(a)-(b)), and that of MBT-fused
images has slightly difference (Fig. 3(b), Fig. 4(c)). On the
other hand, the improvement of spatial quality is obvious in all
fused images. However, there are blurred phenomenon between
different objects in both SFIM-fused and WT-fused images (Fig.
4(a)-(b)), and the features in MBT-fused images are the same
clear with HSR image (Fig. 4(c), Fig. 3(a)).
Spectral quality
Spatial quality
SD
ERGAS
CC
ERGAS
MSI
0.003
0.626
SFIM
MS2
MS3
0.003
0.003
1.070
0.718
0.711
82.535
MS4
0.001
0.860
MSI
0.008
0.591
DWT
MS2
MS3
0.009
0.018
4.260
0.670
0.645
85.518
MS4
0.001
0.797
MSI
0.016
0.858
МВТ
MS2
MS3
0.015
0.014
5.184
0.881
0.823
80.757
MS4
0.001
0.868
Table 1. Quantitative evaluation results of Quickbird
(c)
Figure 4. The fusion results of Quickbird. (a) RGB false-
colour composition 4, 3 and 2 of SFIM. (b) RGB false-colour
composition 4, 3 and 2 of DWT. (c) RGB false-colour
composition 4, 3 and 2 of МВТ
Visual evaluation is subjective and nor comprehensive. The
evaluation result of fused images with quantitative calculation
is a comprehensive evaluation. First, we compare the spectral
quality evaluation indexes SD and spectral ERG AS from Table
1. The index SD values of SFIM-fused images are the lowest.
The spectral ERGAS and average SD values of three fusion
methods are 1.070 and 0.003 (SFIM), 4.260 and 0.009 (DWT),
5.184 and 0.012 (МВТ), respectively. So, both spectral ERGAS
and average SD indexes of SFIM-fused images are more close
to zero compared with DWT or МВТ. In other words, SFIM
fusion method has optimal spectral information preservation
with LSR images of Quickbird, followed by DWT and МВТ.
Then, we analyse the spatial quality evaluation indexes CC and
spatial ERGAS. The value of CC index between either band
MBT-fused images with HSR image is the highest. The average
values of CC index of three fusion methods are 0.729 (SFIM),
0.676 (DWT), 0.858 (МВТ), and the spatial ERGAS indexes of
three fusion methods are 82.535 (SFIM), 85.518 (DBT) and
80.757 (МВТ), respectively. So, the average CC index value of
МВТ fusion method is the highest among the three fusion
methods and the spatial ERDAS index value of МВТ is the
lowest. Thus, МВТ fusion method has the highest spatial
information preservation with HSR image of Quickbird among