The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. Vol. XXXVII. Part B7. Beijing 2008
ашВЩмиИШимШИИИ
where d = (1 - S)Y, Y = the total value of the collectivity
t = H when the number of samples is bigger than 45
71
RSAC has used the above formulas to calculate the least
samples in stratified sampling of early rice of 2007 in China
using FAM and SCM, and the result is listed in table 3. Based
on the methods of stratified sampling, the sampling proportion
is different between the FAM and the SCM. The former is
0.0377, and the latter is 0.0231. Sampling with FAM needs the
least samples of 94, and with SCM only 58. Sampling with
SCM seems better than with FAM at the point of sampling
proportion. However, the numbers of sampling units distributed
to six layers change more violently with SCM than FAM,
which leads the least samples of six layers to the same situation.
layer
total units
the least samples
by FAM
by SCM
by FAM
by SCM
1
927
1014
35
24
2
506
755
19
18
3
358
60
14
1
4
280
394
11
9
5
227
201
9
5
6
199
73
8
2
total
2497
2497
94
58
Table 3. The result of calculating the least samples
3.1.6 Sampling using RS and GIS: When the job of stratified
sampling has been done, the next step is to show the layers in
GIS as figure 2. Then, some RS images covering the sampling
units should be ordered according to the least samples of every
layer, and imaging date should be in early planting days of the
surveyed crop. The area covered by images ordered should not
be less than the area of the least samples of every layer.
Because of the clouds covered in the paddy region of three
seventh during the period of surveying early rice of 2007 in
China, RSAC only ordered 36 SPOT images in stratified
sampling. On the basis of this status, the surveying collectivity
was adjusted and sampling units was stratified once again. The
3.2.1 The shape and size of sampling unit of GRS: The
sampling units of GRS can be called sampling frames. The
sampling frames are designed as polygons that are located on
farmland by RSAC (Chen, 1990). The polygons are mainly
made up of natural borderlines coming from land cover such as
road, dyke, ribbing, etc. Each polygon area is about 25 hectare.
The structure is shown below. The two sampling frames used
by RSAC to survey the area of rice are distributed in
Guangdong province of China. In the map the codes indicate
different land cover. The code of 1100 indicates paddy field, the
code of 2000 indicates fallow, the code of 8001 indicates dykes,
the code of 7000 indicates roads, the code of 1800 indicates
vegetables, the code of 3000 indicates garden plots, and the
code of 1901 indicates other plots of crops.
new number of the collectivity is 1699, and the summation of
least samples of six layers is 74 using FAM, it is 56 using SCM.
However, the total number of sampling units is 201 in the actual
application.
3.1.7 Estimating the collectivity: Interpreting RS images
covering the sampling units is an important step before
estimating the surveying collectivity (Thomas, 2002). The
quality of interpretation is closely related to the result of
surveying (Yang, 2002). The key point of interpretation is to
discriminate the crop and get the crop area of each sampling
unit covered by RS images. After the total sampling units
covered by RS images have been interpreted, the total area of
surveying crop is to be estimated using the following formula:
Ÿ- tiffin,
(8)
h=l 7=1
Where y M = the crop acreage of unit ,■ of the h layer
N = total number of sampling units of the h layer
y = estimate value of total area of the collectivity
L = total number of the layers,
h = 1,2,... ,L
n h ~ the amount of sampls of the h layer
RSAC used two continuous years’ RS data to calculate the crop
area variation rate based on SSM. Using FAM, the variation
rate of area of early-rice covered the four-sevenths paddy fields
of China is -2.48% from 2006 to 2007 and the confidence
interval is from -8.91% to 4.41% while the confidence is 95%.
Using SCM, the variation rate is -2.30% and the confidence
interval is from -9.51% to 5.49% while the confidence is 95%.
3.2 Ground random sampling using GPS
Ground Random Sampling (GRS) using GPS is an independent
method adopted by RSAC. On one hand, using GRS can make
up for the lack of RS such as images covered by clouds. On the
other hand, ground sampling can provide independent
information of agricultural condition such as crops area, and
crops geographical position information, which provides
reference to the interpretation of RS images.
Figure 2. The structure of sampling frames
1341