CMRT09: Object Extraction for 3D City Models, Road Databases and Traffic Monitoring - Concepts, Algorithms, and Evaluation
The strength of this process is its ability to localize accurate
global structure breaks: it separates façades and foreground. On
the one hand, split results at the foreground are not really inter
esting because the related region is not in the rectified plane: they
are based on chaotic gradient distribution. In such a case, the
process stops or it oversegments. This phenomenon typically oc
curs on the cars of figure 11. On the other hand, splits inside
façade texture provides some significative information. On fig
ure 10, the left façade is first split between the second and the
third floor, whereas the first windows column is extracted from
the right façade. This different strategy certainly must be ex
plained by the fact that the process is exclusively based on edges
alignment. An other criterion like contour uniformity may direct
the split decision toward a more significant separation: favoring
floor separation rather than window columns.
Figure 3 shows the region models, the leaves of the segmentation
tree. One can see that the synthetic image reconstructed from the
2Z)-models is very close to the initial image although the rep
resentation is very compact. This shows that our modelling is
particularly well adapted for image compression.
Figure 12: Upper: Rectified façade image. Bottom: Synthetic
image reconstructed from 1000 elementary 2£>-models.
7 CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE WORK
In this paper, we have presented a new unsupervised model-based
segmentation approach that provides interesting result. It is able
to separate a façade from its surroundings but also to organize
façade itself in a hierarchy. Still these are first results, thus there
are many improvements that could be made. The dictionary of
models is currently being extended to periodic textures to man
age for instance balconies, building floors or brick texture. Some
other objects or specializations of objects could be added such
as symmetry computation of (Van Gool et al., 2007). A merger
process at each step of the process could also be useful to correct
oversegmentations. Besides we could add color information to
directly detect difference between two façades ore between two
floors in certain cases. We could also use a point cloud to com
pute an ortho image: displacements due to perspective effects
would be avoided.
Such an unsupervised segmentation will provide of course rele
vant clues to classify the façade architectural style or to detect
objects backward or in front of it. It is also intended to give geo
metrical information that represents relevant indexation features
e.g. windows gab length or floor delineation.
REFERENCES
Alegre, F. and Dellaert, F, 2004. A Probabilistic Approach to the
Semantic Interpretation of Building Facades. Technical report,
Georgia Institute of Technology.
Ali, H., Seifert, C., Jindal, N., Paletta, L. and Paar, G., 2007.
Window Detection in Facades. In: Proc. of the 14th International
Conference on Image Analysis and Processing, pp. 837-842.
Han, F. and Zhu, S.-C., 2005. Bottom-up/top-down image pars
ing by attribute graph grammar. In: International Conference on
Computer Vision, IEEE Computer Society, pp. 1778-1785.
Kalantari, M., Jung, F., Paparoditis, N. and Guédon, J.-P., 2008.
Robust and Automatic Vanishing Points Detection with their Un
certainties from a Single Uncalibrated Image, by Planes Extrac
tion on the Unit Sphere. In: IAPRS, Vol. 37 (Part 3A), Beijing,
China.
Korah, T. and Rasmussen, C., 2007. 2D Lattice Extraction from
Structured Environments. In: International Conference on Image
Analysis and Recognition, Vol. 2, pp. 61-64.
Lee, S. C. and Nevatia, R., 2004. Extraction and Integration of
Window in a 3D Building Model from Ground View images. In:
Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern
Recognition, Vol. 2, pp. 113-120.
Miiller, P., Zeng, G., Wonka, P. and Van Gool, L., 2007. Image-
based Procedural Modeling of Facades. In: Proceedings of ACM
SIGGRAPH 2007 / ACM Transactions on Graphics, Vol. 26num-
ber 3, p. 85.
Reznik, S. and Mayer, H., 2007. Implicit Shape Models, Model
Selection, and Plane Sweeping for 3D Facade Interpretation. In:
Photogrammetric Image Analysis, p. 173.
Ripperda, N., 2008. Determination of Facade Attributes for Fa
cade Reconstruction. In: Proc. of the 21st Congress of the Inter
national Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing.
Cech, J. and Sara, R., 2007. Windowpane Detection based on
Maximum Aposteriori Probability Labeling. Technical report,
K13133 FEE Czech Technical University, Prague, Czech Repub
lic.
Van Gool, L. J., Zeng, G., Van den Borre, F. and Müller, P., 2007.
Towards Mass-Produced Building Models. In: Photogrammetric
Image Analysis, p. 209.
Wenzel, S. and Förstner, W., 2008. Semi-supervised Incremental
Learning of Hierarchical Appearance Models. In: Proc. of the
21st Congress of the International Society for Photogrammetry
and Remote Sensing.