improved from 6311 sec for about 1,720,000 scanned points to
2845 sec for about 21,800,000 points. Therefore, the
considerable improvements in the recognition accuracy and
computational performance were achieved in this research.
However, the accuracy slightly degraded in the chemical plant.
The reason of the degradation was speculated that there are lot
of points on the straight pipes very close to the non-straight
pipes, and the situation induced the indispensable error in the
normal tensor evaluation.
4. CONCLUSION
A new algorithm was proposed that could automatically
recognize a piping system from registered laser scanned points
of a plant. Normal-based region growing allowed extracting the
points on piping system. Eigen analysis of the normal tensor
and cylinder surface fitting allows the algorithm to accurately
recognize portions of straight pipes. Tracing axes, fitting arc-
line segments and complementing of segments realized the
accurate recognition of the position of elbows and junctions and
their connection relationship. The recognition accuracy was
verified for large-scale point clouds of actual plants, and the
considerable improvements in the recognition accuracy and
computational cost were realized
However, some normal tensors could not correctly evaluate in
the straight pipes in very tangled space. This remains to be part
of our future work.
References:
Masuda. H, Tanaka. I, Enomoto. M, 2012, "Reliable Surface Extraction from Point-
Clouds using Scanner-Dependent Parameters”, Computer-Aided Design and
Applications, Vol.10, No.2, pp.265-277.
Rabbani. T, Heuvel. F, 2004, “3D Industrial Reconstruction by Fitting CSG Models to a
Combination of Images and Point Clouds”, Proceedings of ISPRS The International
Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol.35,
No.B3, pp.7-12.
Aurelien. B, Chaine. R, Marc. C, Thibault. G, Akkouche. S, 2011, "Reconstruction of
Consistent 3D CAD Models from Point Cloud Data Using A Priori CAD Models",
Proceedings of ISPRS Workshop Laser Scanning 201 1, submission-26.
Johnson. A, Hoffman. R, Osborn. J, Hebert. M, 1997, *A system for semi-automatic
modeling of complex environments", Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on
Recent Advances in 3-D Digital Imaging and Modeling, pp.213-220.
Lee. J, Kim. C, Son. H, Kim. C, 2012, *Skeleton-Based 3D Reconstruction of As-Built
Pipelines from Laser-Scanned Data", Proceedings of the 2012 ASCE International
Conference on Computing in Civil Engineering, pp.245-252.
Belton. D, Lichti. D, 2006, "Classification and Segmentation of Terrestrial Laser
Scanner Point Clouds Using Local Variance Information", The International Archives of
the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol.36, No.5,
pp. 44-49
Rabbani. T, Heuvel. F, Vosselman. G, 2006, "Segmentation of point clouds using
smoothness constraint", International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing
and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol. 36, pp. 248-253.
Vosselman. G, Gorte. B.G.H, Sithole. G, Rabbani. T, 2004, “Recognising Structure in
Laser Scanner Point Clouds”, International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote
Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol.46, pp.33-38.
El-Halawany. S, Lichti. D, 2011, “Detection of road poles from mobile terrestrial laser
Scanner point cloud”, Proc. of 2011 International Workshop on Multi-
Platform/MultiSensor Remote Sensing and Mapping (M2RSM), pp. 1-6.
Marshall. A. D, Lukacs. G, Martin. R. R, 2001, “Robust segmentation of primitives from
range data in the presence of geometric degeneracy”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern
Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Vol.23, No.3, pp.304-314.
Kawashima. K, Kanai. S, Date. H, 2011, “Automatic Recognition of a Piping System
from Large-scale Terrestrial Laser Scan Data”, Proceedings of ISPRS Workshop Laser
Scanning 2011, submission-20.
Shakarji. M. C, 1998, “Least-Squares Fitting Algorithms of the NIST Algorithm Testing
System”, Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology,
Vol.103, No.6, pp.633-641.
Bauer. U, Polthier. K, 2009, “Generating parametric models of tubes from laser scans”,
Computer-Aided Design, Vol.41, No.10, pp.719-729.
126
14.8 [m]
A
(b) Final recognition
Figure.8 Recognition result of piping system of an oil rig
Table.1 Accuracy of piping system recognition of an oil rig
(a) Straight pipe (b) Connecting parts
Result of automatic recognition
nition |negative | positive nition
11.4 [m] 8.6 [m]
(a) Scanned point cloud (21,880,374 points)
(b) Final recognition
Figure.9 Recognition result of piping system
of a chemical plant
Table.2 Accuracy of piping system recognition of
a chemical plant
(a) Straight pipe (b) Connecting parts
Result of automatic recognition
recog- nition | negative | positive nition
Elbow
o
>
=
Others
Total
KEY WO
ABSTRA
Registrati
well as th
point clou
transforme
depth me:
demonstra
Since thei
such as t
popularity
Kinect sei
20-30 fre
coloured
Compared
accuracy
high data
make it ar
environme
A primary
Successive
features, i
images by
SIFT (Lo
correspon
depth dat
translatior
The pairw
error of ir
colour sp
pairwise r
in the res
loop closi
Endres et
of the sen:
that is pre
adjustmen
simultane
Loop clos
a long na
do not ha
* Corres,