Full text: Algebraic invariants

=Xi(77 2 f3 — ^3^2)+^2(l?3fl — +^3(^1 ^2 —7?2fl), 
§67] 
CONCOMITANTS OF TERNARY FORMS 
95 
A concomitant of the forms ji(x\, X2, xs) is evidently a 
covariant of the enlarged system of forms /< and u x . We may 
therefore restrict attention to covariants. In the proof of the 
corresponding theorem for binary forms, we used the operator 
(1), § 42. Here we employ an operator V composed of six terms 
each a partial differentiation of the third order: 
a 
0£i 
J3_ 
a £2 
_a_ 
a& 
a 
a 
a 
a 3 
a^i 
dv2 
dvs 
aaa^afs 
a 
ah 
_a_ 
af 2 
_a_ 
afs 
the determinant being symbolic. It may be shown as in 
§ 43 that 
F(^r)” = w(w+l)(w+2)(^r)”" 1 . 
As in § 44, the result of applying V r to a product of k factors 
of the type l factors of the type /3,, and m factors of the 
type 7 f , is a sum of terms each containing k—r factors a 
l — r factors p v , m—r factors 7$-, and r factors of the type (a/3y). 
For the case of an invariant /, the theorem can be proved 
without a device. In the notations of § 65, we have 
i{A)=dvifm. 
Each A is a product of factors a^, a n , a$. Hence I {A) equals 
a sum of terms each with X factors of the type a^, X of type 
a v , and X of type a^. Operate on each member of the equation 
with F x . The left member becomes a sum of terms each a 
product of a constant and factors of type (afiy). The right 
member becomes the product of 1(a) by a number not zero. 
Hence I equals a polynomial in the (afiy). 
For a covariant K, we have, by definition, 
K(A,X) = (MYK(a, x). 
Solving the equations of our transformation T in § 65, 
we get
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.