Table 2. Regressions of sugar beet cover percentage
and spectral parameters in 1984.
Parameter
Regression type
Corr. coeff.
VI
power fit
.83
PVI
power fit
.90
ID
power fit
.94
GREENNESS
logarithmic fit
.85
Table 2 shows the results of best fit regression
calculations for the 1984 data.
These were again used to compute predicted cover
percentages based on 1985 spectral data. All values
exceeding complete coverage were set at 100 X.
Regressions ux predicted versus averaged measured
values are displayed in Figure 6. Due to limited
availability of low cover data the slope of the
regressions lines is strongly influenced by few
points. Predicted values based on Greenness approach
closely the 1:1 line.
Accurate cover percentage estimation can give
important indications on seedling establishment.
Figure 6. Relationship between measured and predicted
cover percentage for sugar beets. Complete cover
prediction points are omitted for clarity.
4.3. Sugar mass
Sugar mass (kg/ha) was calculated from fresh root
weight data and sugar content (%) analysis. Evolution
of both measured biomass parameters in the course of
the growing season is displayed in Figure 7. While
sugar content is similar in both growing seasons,
root mass is considerably lower in 1985.
The "leaf area duration" concept was applied by
computing GLAD values. A6 Figure 8 shows, and
confirming what is known from sugar beet physiology
research, prolongued availability of a large amount
of phoyosynthetically active crop canopy does not
necessarily result in increased sugar accumulation.
Rather increased leaf development occurs at the
expense of root growth which in turn has limited sink
capacity. Unusually advantageous weather conditions
Figure 7. White sugar percentage (full line) and
fresh root mass (dashed line) in 1984 (x) and 1985
(+).
Figure 8. White sugar mass in function of GLAD in
1984 (x) and 1985 (+).
Figure 9. Relation between NEKC (full line), PVIC
(dashed line) and white sugar mass in 1984 (x) abd
1985 (+). Relations with VIC and GREENNESSC are
similar to NDC and PVIC respectively but are not
shown.
in September and October 1985 (high daily
temperatures, low rainfall and cool nights) caused
spectacular sugar accumulation.
Accumulated spectral values for VI (VIC), ND (NDC),
PVI (PVIC) and Greenness (Greennessc) were computed.
Some of these values are plotted against sugar mass
in Figure 9.
A linear relationship for the 1984 growing season is
apparent, while the above explained meteorological
phenomena
attempt t
relations!
senseless.
5 conclus:
Remote sei
of sugar
indirect i
to meteor
not indice
and root I
rather pr>
more data
Estimated
models w]
factors,
with remot
results as
ultimate
incorporat
parameters
It was al:
derived f
those ob
radiometer
AKNOWLEDGE
This rese
Field equ:
for Remot
throughout
The autho
developmer
customized
and Dirk
metric mea
REFERENCES
Allen, E.J
growth c
94:583-e
Analogides
starting
ty. Proc
Andrieu B.
ques et
la rhizc
on Rem.
Badhwar, G
Satellit
maps as
hierarch
265-281.
Boehnel, F
tu mease
tral cha
beets.
Detectic
sing tec
Europear
Colwell, J
yield fc
Symp. or
1254.
De Wulf, 1
indicati
from CD