×

You are using an outdated browser that does not fully support the intranda viewer.
As a result, some pages may not be displayed correctly.

We recommend you use one of the following browsers:

Full text

Title
New perspectives to save cultural heritage
Author
Altan, M. Orhan

CIPA 2003 XIX th International Symposium, 30 September — 04 October, 2003, Antalya, Turkey
6.2 Determining of Real Estates And Their Values
The purpose of this study is gaining of the all real estates with
private property to public property in the study area. To realize
this purpose, all real estates, except government properties, will
be transferred. In that point, determining of real estates values is
very important. Most of the buildings in the study area are in
ruin situation and used as residential buildings Figure 6 (a).
While real estates values are determined Figure 6 (b), both land
and building value are determined separately and then the sum
of these values give real estate’s value. In determining of
building value, cost method should be used, and in determining
of land value, nominal valuation method should be used for
getting suitable and practical results in such wide areas. The
method is based on determining of factors that effects real
estate value and a point for each real estate (Nisanci and
Yomralioglu, 2002).
compared. After the calculation and comparing of values,
development rights are transferred to receiver area. In
application, local administrators allows using such rights but
not demand price for that allowings. Whereas, used right is a
public right.
Second Approach;
Supplying the study area is wide, using development rights in
the same district (Figure 7). Property design in such a approach
is analyzed with land readjustment respect to 18. article of
Development Law. The advantage of this approach is that there
is no need approval of real estate owners.
Third Approach;
Using public domains for protecting cultural heritage same as
used by local authorities in slum protection area.
7. CONCLUSION AND PROPOSALS
TDR may be of particular use in contexts where resources to
achieve specific physical objectives are scarce. Typical are the
cases of protection of natural and historical assets in Turkiye.
For this reason, the potential exploitation of TDR is inquired
here in a typical case study of historical conservation,
emphasizing how this procedure could be supplemented
through TDR as a planning tool, as well as, the calculation of
the volume of financial resources required, together with GIS
methods in representation, accounting and plan making. There
may be alternative methods of modelling the physical and
financial arrangements through GIS methods. Yet benefits of
such practice prove commendable implementations.
Proposed in this study, TDR method is a new approach for
Turkey but extremely in active-fair structure. Arising with
protection development plan between real estate owners,
benefit-cost balance is provided with this method. However,
this method has not been in legal regulations of Turkey.
So, it should be firstly added to Turkish Development Law.
Which instution will implement it should be specified.
Inventory of urban public land stock should be defined and
maintaned with GIS tachnics.
TDR method and existing readjustment regulations should be
integrated and flexible property organization chance should be
provided.
602