28
SAR image has its own characteristics. How to chose or
organize the algorithms in optimization is desirable to study in
the future.
REFERENCES
[1] C. Pohl, J.L. Van Genderen. Mulitisensor image fusion in
remote sensing: concepts, methods and applications,
International Journal of Remote Sensing, 19(5): 823-854, 1998.
[2] J.D.Knowles, D.W. Come. Approximating the nondominated
front using the Pareto archived evolution strategy, Evolutionary
Computation, 8(2): 149-172, 2000.
[3] K. Deb, A. Pratap, S. Agarwal, T. Meyarivan. A fast and
elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II, IEEE Trans.
Evol. Comput., 6(2): 182-197, 2002.
[4] C.A. Coello, G. T. Pulido, M. S. Lechuga. Handling
multiple objectives with particle swarm optimization, IEEE
Trans. Evol. Comput., 8(3):256-279, 2004.
[5] Yifeng Niu,Lincheng Shen. A Novel Approach to Image
Fusion Based on Multi-Objective Optimization, Proceedings of
the 6th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation,
Dalian, China , IEEE: 9911-9915,2006.
[6] Zhong. Zhang, Rick S. Blum. A categorization of
multiscale-decomposition-based image fusion schemes with a
performance study for a digital camera application. Proceedings
of IEEE, 87(8): 1315-1326, 1999.
[7] Yin Chen, Rick S. Blum. Experimental Tests of Image
Fusion for Night Vision. The 7th International Conference on
Information Fusion, IEEE: 491-498, 2005.
[8] Zhongxiu Hu ,Scott T. Acton. Morphological Pyramid
Image Registration.
http://ieeexplore.ieee.Org/iel5/6776/l 8128/00839604.pdf
[9] A. Toet. Image fusion by a ratio of low-pass pyramid.
Pattern Recognition Letters, 9:245-253, 1996.
[10] J.Kennedy, R.C. Eberhart. Particle swarm optimization,
Proc.IEEE Int. Conf. Neural Networks, 4:1942-1948, 1995.
[11] M.R. Sierra, C.A. Coello, Improving PSO-based multi
objective optimization using crowding, mutation and e-
dominance, Proc. EMO 2005, LNCS, vol. 3410: 505-519,2005.
[12] Y. Shi, R.C. Eberhart. A modified particle swarm
optimizer. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Evol. Comput.: 69-73, 1998.
[13] R.C. Eberhart, Y. Shi. Particle swarm optimization:
development, applications and resources. Proc. IEEE Conf.
Evol. Comput: 81-86, 2001.
[14] Z.J. Wang, D. Ziou, C. Armenakis, et al. Comparative
analysis of image fusion methods, IEEE Trans. GeoRS., 43(6):
1391-1402, 2005.
[15] J. Li. Spatial quality evaluation of fusion of different
resolution images. International Archives of Photogrammetry
and Remote Sensing, Vol.33, 2000.
[16] V. Buntilov, T. Bretschneider. Objective content dependent
quality measures for image fusion of optical data. IEEE
International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium,613-
616, 2004.
[17] A. Toet, E. M. Franken. Perceptual Evaluation of Different
Image Fusion Schemes. Displays, 24(l):25-37, 2003.
[18] G. Piella, H. Heijmans. A new quality metric for image
fusion. Proceedings of International Conference on Image
Processing, 173-176, 2003.
[19] Guihong Qu, Dali Zhang. Information measure for
performance of image fusion. Electronics Letters, 38(7):313-
315,2002.
[20] Zhou Wang, Alan C. Bovik. A universal image quality
index. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 9(3):81 -84, 2002.
ORTHOR]
a I
KEY WORDS:
ABSTRACT:
A method to ort
image according
information mat
be registered fn
homologous poi
well as the relat:
result is satisfact
Being an effe<
aperture radar |
complimentary
weather capabil
launched since
Chinese first
monitoring will
image must be
without any di
digital elevatio:
influence of terr,
methods to recti
fine the satelliti
points (GCP) th
DEM is combim
image. The oth<
using DEM dire
into the geo-i
corresponding r
and real SAR ii
automatically. T
GCP is not nee
possible to orth
distortion canno
the simulated S.
SAR image in oi
method is used,
with real SAR f
proposed in thi:
rectified based o
2. SIMUL,
Simulated SAR
geometry princi
DEM. Both
corresponding tc
in order to gene
range-Doppler ft
grid point beca
synthetic using I
