MONITORING THE HANFORD SITE AND SURROUNDING ENVIRONMENT: LONG-TERM TRENDS
Robert H. Gray, Manager, Office of Hanford Environment,
Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Washington, USA.
ABSTRACT
Environmental monitoring has been conducted on the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Hanford Site for
45 years. Current monitoring objectives are to detect and assess potential impacts of facility
operations on air, surface and ground water, soil, vegetation, foodstuffs, fish and wildlife. Data from
monitoring efforts are used to calculate the overall radiological dose to humans working onsite or
residing in nearby communities.
In 1988, measured Hanford Site perimeter concentrations of airborne radionuclides were below applicable
DOE and Environmental Protection Agency guidelines. Tritium and nitrate continued to be the most
widespread constituents in onsite ground water. Chromium, cyanide, fluoride and carbon tetrachloride
were found in ground water near operating wells. Concentrations of radionuclides and nonradiological
water quality in the Columbia River were in compliance with applicable standards. Foodstuffs irrigated
with river water taken downstream of the Site showed low levels of radionuclides that were similar to
concentrations in foodstuffs from control areas (i.e., foodstuffs not irrigated with Columbia River
water). Low levels of 90 Sr and 137 Cs in some onsite wildlife samples were typical of those attributable
to worldwide fallout, as were concentrations of radionuclides in soils and vegetation from onsite and
offsite locations. The calculated effective dose potentially received by a maximally exposed individual
(i.e., a hypothetical individual using worst-case assumptions for all routes of exposure) in 1988
(0.08 mrem/yr) was similar to doses calculated for 1985 through 1987.
In addition to monitoring radioactivity in fish and wildlife, population numbers of key species are
determined. Chinook salmon (Oncorhvnchus tshawvtscha) spawning in the Columbia River at Hanford has
increased in recent years with a concomitant increase in the number of bald eagles (Haliaeetus
1eucocephalus) that overwinter onsite. The Site also serves as a nesting area and refuge for great
basin Canada goose (Branta canadensis moffitti) and great blue heron (Ardea herodias), and supports
stable or growing populations of elk (Cervus elaphus), mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus), coyote (Canis
1atrans), and a variety of plants and other animals.
KEY WORDS: Environmental Monitoring, Radionuclides, Chemicals, Fish, Wildlife
INTRODUCTION
The U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Hanford
Site occupies a land area of about 1,450 km 2
(560 mi 2 ) in semi-arid southeastern Washington,
U.S.A. (Figure 1). The Columbia River flows
through the Site and forms part of its eastern
boundary. Flow of the Columbia River is regu
lated daily according to electric power demands.
Although the river was once closed to public
access, public use for recreational and barge
traffic is again practical. The southwestern
portion of the Site includes the southern ter
minus of the Rattlesnake Hills with elevations
exceeding 1,000 m. Both unconfined and confined
aquifers lie beneath the Site.
Nuclear and non-nuclear industrial and research
activities have been conducted at Hanford since
1943. The most environmentally significant acti
vities have involved the production of nuclear
materials and the chemical processing and waste
management associated with the major product,
plutonium. Byproduct wastes have included gamma,
beta, and alpha-emitting radionuclides and
various nonradioactive chemicals in gaseous,
liquid and solid forms.
There are currently four major DOE operations
areas on the Hanford Site (Figure 1). The
100 Areas located along the Columbia River in
clude the dual-purpose N Reactor that produced
plutonium for national defense and steam for the
Hanford Generating Project (HGP), operated by the
Washington Public Power Supply System (WPPSS),
and eight, now deactivated single-purpose, plu
tonium production reactors. The plutonium
uranium extraction (PUREX) plant (reactor fuel
reprocessing), plutonium finishing plant
(Z Plant), and waste-disposal facilities are
located in the 200 Areas on a plateau (elevation
229 m) about 11.3 km west of the Columbia River.
The 300 Area, located just north of Richland,
Washington contains the uranium fuel manufacturing
facilities in support of N Reactor, and research
and development laboratories. The Fast Flux Test
Facility which has operated intermittently since
1981 to test new fuels and materials for future
breeder reactor technology is located in the
400 Area. Nongovernment facilities within Hanford
Site boundaries include HGP, the WPPSS nuclear
plant (WNP) sites, WNP-1, WNP-2 and WNP-4,
including one commercial reactor (WNP-2) that
achieved full operational status in the fall of
1984, and a commercial low-level radioactive-waste
burial site near the 200 Areas, operated by U.S.
Ecology. The Advanced Nuclear Fuels Corp. (for
merly Exxon) fuel fabrication facility is imme
diately adjacent to, but not located on, Hanford
Site property.
Environmental monitoring has been conducted at
Hanford for over 45 years. The monitoring program
is designed to assess potential impacts to
individuals and populations that may be exposed to
radionuclides, ionizing radiation and hazardous
chemicals. Environmental monitoring currently
includes air, surface and ground water, soil,
vegetation, foodstuffs (fruits, vegetables, milk),
fish and wildlife. Fish and wildlife are
monitored for radioactivity and to determine the
population status of key species.
RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING
Air
Potential airborne transport of stack releases
containing radionuclides from Hanford facilities
offers a direct pathway for human exposure.
678