Retrodigitalisierung Logo Full screen
  • First image
  • Previous image
  • Next image
  • Last image
  • Show double pages
Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Fusion of sensor data, knowledge sources and algorithms for extraction and classification of topographic objects

Access restriction

There is no access restriction for this record.

Copyright

CC BY: Attribution 4.0 International. You can find more information here.

Bibliographic data

fullscreen: Fusion of sensor data, knowledge sources and algorithms for extraction and classification of topographic objects

Monograph

Persistent identifier:
856473650
Author:
Baltsavias, Emmanuel P.
Title:
Fusion of sensor data, knowledge sources and algorithms for extraction and classification of topographic objects
Sub title:
Joint ISPRS/EARSeL Workshop ; 3 - 4 June 1999, Valladolid, Spain
Scope:
III, 209 Seiten
Year of publication:
1999
Place of publication:
Coventry
Publisher of the original:
RICS Books
Identifier (digital):
856473650
Illustration:
Illustrationen, Diagramme, Karten
Language:
English
Usage licence:
Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
Publisher of the digital copy:
Technische Informationsbibliothek Hannover
Place of publication of the digital copy:
Hannover
Year of publication of the original:
2016
Document type:
Monograph
Collection:
Earth sciences

Chapter

Title:
TECHNICAL SESSION 6 INTEGRATION OF IMAGE ANALYSIS AND GIS
Document type:
Monograph
Structure type:
Chapter

Chapter

Title:
INVESTIGATION OF SYNERGY EFFECTS BETWEEN SATELLITE IMAGERY AND DIGITAL TOPOGRAPHIC DATABASES BY USING INTEGRATED KNOWLEDGE PROCESSING. Dietmar Kunz
Document type:
Monograph
Structure type:
Chapter

Contents

Table of contents

  • Fusion of sensor data, knowledge sources and algorithms for extraction and classification of topographic objects
  • Cover
  • ColorChart
  • Title page
  • CONTENTS
  • PREFACE
  • TECHNICAL SESSION 1 OVERVIEW OF IMAGE / DATA / INFORMATION FUSION AND INTEGRATION
  • DEFINITIONS AND TERMS OF REFERENCE IN DATA FUSION. L. Wald
  • TOOLS AND METHODS FOR FUSION OF IMAGES OF DIFFERENT SPATIAL RESOLUTION. C. Pohl
  • INTEGRATION OF IMAGE ANALYSIS AND GIS. Emmanuel Baltsavias, Michael Hahn,
  • TECHNICAL SESSION 2 PREREQUISITES FOR FUSION / INTEGRATION: IMAGE TO IMAGE / MAP REGISTRATION
  • GEOCODING AND COREGISTRATION OF MULTISENSOR AND MULTITEMPORAL REMOTE SENSING IMAGES. Hannes Raggam, Mathias Schardt and Heinz Gallaun
  • GEORIS : A TOOL TO OVERLAY PRECISELY DIGITAL IMAGERY. Ph.Garnesson, D.Bruckert
  • AUTOMATED PROCEDURES FOR MULTISENSOR REGISTRATION AND ORTHORECTIFICATION OF SATELLITE IMAGES. Ian Dowman and Paul Dare
  • TECHNICAL SESSION 3 OBJECT AND IMAGE CLASSIFICATION
  • LANDCOVER MAPPING BY INTERRELATED SEGMENTATION AND CLASSIFICATION OF SATELLITE IMAGES. W. Schneider, J. Steinwendner
  • INCLUSION OF MULTISPECTRAL DATA INTO OBJECT RECOGNITION. Bea Csathó , Toni Schenk, Dong-Cheon Lee and Sagi Filin
  • SCALE CHARACTERISTICS OF LOCAL AUTOCOVARIANCES FOR TEXTURE SEGMENTATION. Annett Faber, Wolfgang Förstner
  • BAYESIAN METHODS: APPLICATIONS IN INFORMATION AGGREGATION AND IMAGE DATA MINING. Mihai Datcu and Klaus Seidel
  • TECHNICAL SESSION 4 FUSION OF SENSOR-DERIVED PRODUCTS
  • AUTOMATIC CLASSIFICATION OF URBAN ENVIRONMENTS FOR DATABASE REVISION USING LIDAR AND COLOR AERIAL IMAGERY. N. Haala, V. Walter
  • STRATEGIES AND METHODS FOR THE FUSION OF DIGITAL ELEVATION MODELS FROM OPTICAL AND SAR DATA. M. Honikel
  • INTEGRATION OF DTMS USING WAVELETS. M. Hahn, F. Samadzadegan
  • ANISOTROPY INFORMATION FROM MOMS-02/PRIRODA STEREO DATASETS - AN ADDITIONAL PHYSICAL PARAMETER FOR LAND SURFACE CHARACTERISATION. Th. Schneider, I. Manakos, Peter Reinartz, R. Müller
  • TECHNICAL SESSION 5 FUSION OF VARIABLE SPATIAL / SPECTRAL RESOLUTION IMAGES
  • ADAPTIVE FUSION OF MULTISOURCE RASTER DATA APPLYING FILTER TECHNIQUES. K. Steinnocher
  • FUSION OF 18 m MOMS-2P AND 30 m LANDS AT TM MULTISPECTRAL DATA BY THE GENERALIZED LAPLACIAN PYRAMID. Bruno Aiazzi, Luciano Alparone, Stefano Baronti, Ivan Pippi
  • OPERATIONAL APPLICATIONS OF MULTI-SENSOR IMAGE FUSION. C. Pohl, H. Touron
  • TECHNICAL SESSION 6 INTEGRATION OF IMAGE ANALYSIS AND GIS
  • KNOWLEDGE BASED INTERPRETATION OF MULTISENSOR AND MULTITEMPORAL REMOTE SENSING IMAGES. Stefan Growe
  • AUTOMATIC RECONSTRUCTION OF ROOFS FROM MAPS AND ELEVATION DATA. U. Stilla, K. Jurkiewicz
  • INVESTIGATION OF SYNERGY EFFECTS BETWEEN SATELLITE IMAGERY AND DIGITAL TOPOGRAPHIC DATABASES BY USING INTEGRATED KNOWLEDGE PROCESSING. Dietmar Kunz
  • INTERACTIVE SESSION 1 IMAGE CLASSIFICATION
  • AN AUTOMATED APPROACH FOR TRAINING DATA SELECTION WITHIN AN INTEGRATED GIS AND REMOTE SENSING ENVIRONMENT FOR MONITORING TEMPORAL CHANGES. Ulrich Rhein
  • CLASSIFICATION OF SETTLEMENT STRUCTURES USING MORPHOLOGICAL AND SPECTRAL FEATURES IN FUSED HIGH RESOLUTION SATELLITE IMAGES (IRS-1C). Maik Netzband, Gotthard Meinel, Regin Lippold
  • ASSESSMENT OF NOISE VARIANCE AND INFORMATION CONTENT OF MULTI-/HYPER-SPECTRAL IMAGERY. Bruno Aiazzi, Luciano Alparone, Alessandro Barducci, Stefano Baronti, Ivan Pippi
  • COMBINING SPECTRAL AND TEXTURAL FEATURES FOR MULTISPECTRAL IMAGE CLASSIFICATION WITH ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS. H. He , C. Collet
  • TECHNICAL SESSION 7 APPLICATIONS IN FORESTRY
  • SENSOR FUSED IMAGES FOR VISUAL INTERPRETATION OF FOREST STAND BORDERS. R. Fritz, I. Freeh, B. Koch, Chr. Ueffing
  • A LOCAL CORRELATION APPROACH FOR THE FUSION OF REMOTE SENSING DATA WITH DIFFERENT SPATIAL RESOLUTIONS IN FORESTRY APPLICATIONS. J. Hill, C. Diemer, O. Stöver, Th. Udelhoven
  • OBJECT-BASED CLASSIFICATION AND APPLICATIONS IN THE ALPINE FOREST ENVIRONMENT. R. de Kok, T. Schneider, U. Ammer
  • Author Index
  • Keyword Index
  • Cover

Full text

International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Vol. 32, Part 7-4-3 W6, Valladolid, Spain, 3-4 June, 1999 
149 
performed between objects from both scene descriptions; also 
intersecting objects inside one scene description are treated. 
The object identification codes and the classes of the original 
objects are stored in the new ones. The resulting new objects 
have now new hybrid classes, like ‘settlement from the DLM’ 
and ‘water from the segmentation’. An object has possibly up 
to 6 subclasses. Altogether 80 hybrid classes are possible. 
These new objects are geometrical disjoint and have an 
unambiguous attribute for their class. 
Therefore, the result after building of the disjoint objects is one 
new scene description, where the semantics of the produced 
disjoint objects are not limited to the topographic object classes 
'settlement', 'forest', 'water' or 'agriculture'. There are new 
hybrid classes consisting of two or more topographic classes. 
The spectral as well as the non-spectral features are extracted 
for the disjoint objects. This information is then used as the 
knowledge base in the next step of semantic classification. 
3.2. Semantic Classification 
Given that the problem of the geometry is treated in the 
previous section, only the landuse semantics of the objects are 
now of interest. The knowledge about the disjoint objects lies 
on a higher symbolic level; thus, a system for knowledge 
representation is used. 
Semantic networks are common schemes concerning 
knowledge representation. So far, semantic networks have been 
used in speech recognition (Kummert, 1992), industrial 
(Niemann et al., 1990a) and medical (Bunke, 1985) 
applications and aerial image analysis (Koch et al., 1997). The 
use of a semantic network for satellite image analysis is new. 
For using and modelling the knowledge about the disjoint 
objects - as well as serving as central control unit, ERNEST 
(Erlanger Semantisches Netzwerksystem) is applied in this 
research (Niemann et al., 1990b; Kummert et al., 1993). Based 
on the experiences with ERNEST in aerial image analysis at the 
IPF (Quint, 1997), a semantic net is designed for the 
classification process (see Fig. 14). 
In the semantic network system Ernest, there are three 
different types of links between two nodes: part-of (bst), 
specialization-of‘ (spez) and concrete-of (kon). The links 
describe the relation between two nodes. The nodes represent 
various objects, events, ideas, or abstract concepts. There are 
three different types of nodes: concept, modified concept and 
instance. At first, only concepts exist. During the analysis, 
modified concepts are distinguished from concepts only by 
more restricted ranges for their attribute values. When a 
modified concept has concrete values, it becomes an instance. 
A semantic network contains two different types of knowledge: 
declarative and procedural knowledge. Declarative knowledge 
consists of concepts and links, while procedural knowledge 
contains methods for determination of attributes of concepts, as 
well as for valuation of concepts and relations. The concept 
primitive is the interface to the database. It fetches unused and 
unclassified objects from the database and stores them in the 
concept object. The semantic net retains in the concept unused 
the object primitives that were not already used. Because 
topographic objects consist of one or more outer and inner 
objects, the contour is built in the concept contour. This 
contour object is classified because of its features to one of the 
semantic meanings. The process is repeated until all disjoint 
objects are classified. 
3.2.1. Data Analysis 
Because the scene consists of the four area-based object classes 
‘settlement’, ‘forest’, ‘water’ and ‘reject’, the learned features 
from Section 2 were stored in these concepts. It is assumed, that 
the ‘reject’ class is the same as the ’agriculture’ class, because 
most of the unspecified area in the DLM200 belongs to this 
class. This assumption simplifies the modelling of the concepts 
on the semantic level. In a future refining, the ‘reject’ concept 
could be split up in a concept for the agriculture class and a 
concept for objects who could not be classified with a minimum 
probability. 
In contrast to the automatically learned statistical class features, 
the valuation and analysis function have to be implemented by 
an operator. 
Fig. 14. Semantic net for the semantic classification. 
The strategy of analysis process is a general, problem 
independent strategy provided by the semantic network 
ERNEST. The analysis starts by creating a modified concept for 
a concept. A modified concept is a preliminary result and it 
reflects constraints for the concept that have been determined 
out of the context of the current analysis state. 
Following the top-down hierarchy in the semantic network, the 
concepts on lower hierarchical levels are each expanded 
stepwise until a concept on the lowest level is reached. Since
	        

Cite and reuse

Cite and reuse

Here you will find download options and citation links to the record and current image.

Monograph

METS MARC XML Dublin Core RIS Mirador ALTO TEI Full text PDF DFG-Viewer OPAC
TOC

Chapter

PDF RIS

Image

PDF ALTO TEI Full text
Download

Image fragment

Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame Link to IIIF image fragment

Citation links

Citation links

Monograph

To quote this record the following variants are available:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Chapter

To quote this structural element, the following variants are available:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Image

To quote this image the following variants are available:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Citation recommendation

baltsavias, emmanuel p. Fusion of Sensor Data, Knowledge Sources and Algorithms for Extraction and Classification of Topographic Objects. RICS Books, 1999.
Please check the citation before using it.

Image manipulation tools

Tools not available

Share image region

Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Contact

Have you found an error? Do you have any suggestions for making our service even better or any other questions about this page? Please write to us and we'll make sure we get back to you.

How many letters is "Goobi"?:

I hereby confirm the use of my personal data within the context of the enquiry made.