Retrodigitalisierung Logo Full screen
  • First image
  • Previous image
  • Next image
  • Last image
  • Show double pages
Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Fusion of sensor data, knowledge sources and algorithms for extraction and classification of topographic objects

Access restriction

There is no access restriction for this record.

Copyright

CC BY: Attribution 4.0 International. You can find more information here.

Bibliographic data

fullscreen: Fusion of sensor data, knowledge sources and algorithms for extraction and classification of topographic objects

Monograph

Persistent identifier:
856473650
Author:
Baltsavias, Emmanuel P.
Title:
Fusion of sensor data, knowledge sources and algorithms for extraction and classification of topographic objects
Sub title:
Joint ISPRS/EARSeL Workshop ; 3 - 4 June 1999, Valladolid, Spain
Scope:
III, 209 Seiten
Year of publication:
1999
Place of publication:
Coventry
Publisher of the original:
RICS Books
Identifier (digital):
856473650
Illustration:
Illustrationen, Diagramme, Karten
Language:
English
Usage licence:
Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
Publisher of the digital copy:
Technische Informationsbibliothek Hannover
Place of publication of the digital copy:
Hannover
Year of publication of the original:
2016
Document type:
Monograph
Collection:
Earth sciences

Chapter

Title:
INTERACTIVE SESSION 1 IMAGE CLASSIFICATION
Document type:
Monograph
Structure type:
Chapter

Chapter

Title:
COMBINING SPECTRAL AND TEXTURAL FEATURES FOR MULTISPECTRAL IMAGE CLASSIFICATION WITH ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS. H. He , C. Collet
Document type:
Monograph
Structure type:
Chapter

Contents

Table of contents

  • Fusion of sensor data, knowledge sources and algorithms for extraction and classification of topographic objects
  • Cover
  • ColorChart
  • Title page
  • CONTENTS
  • PREFACE
  • TECHNICAL SESSION 1 OVERVIEW OF IMAGE / DATA / INFORMATION FUSION AND INTEGRATION
  • DEFINITIONS AND TERMS OF REFERENCE IN DATA FUSION. L. Wald
  • TOOLS AND METHODS FOR FUSION OF IMAGES OF DIFFERENT SPATIAL RESOLUTION. C. Pohl
  • INTEGRATION OF IMAGE ANALYSIS AND GIS. Emmanuel Baltsavias, Michael Hahn,
  • TECHNICAL SESSION 2 PREREQUISITES FOR FUSION / INTEGRATION: IMAGE TO IMAGE / MAP REGISTRATION
  • GEOCODING AND COREGISTRATION OF MULTISENSOR AND MULTITEMPORAL REMOTE SENSING IMAGES. Hannes Raggam, Mathias Schardt and Heinz Gallaun
  • GEORIS : A TOOL TO OVERLAY PRECISELY DIGITAL IMAGERY. Ph.Garnesson, D.Bruckert
  • AUTOMATED PROCEDURES FOR MULTISENSOR REGISTRATION AND ORTHORECTIFICATION OF SATELLITE IMAGES. Ian Dowman and Paul Dare
  • TECHNICAL SESSION 3 OBJECT AND IMAGE CLASSIFICATION
  • LANDCOVER MAPPING BY INTERRELATED SEGMENTATION AND CLASSIFICATION OF SATELLITE IMAGES. W. Schneider, J. Steinwendner
  • INCLUSION OF MULTISPECTRAL DATA INTO OBJECT RECOGNITION. Bea Csathó , Toni Schenk, Dong-Cheon Lee and Sagi Filin
  • SCALE CHARACTERISTICS OF LOCAL AUTOCOVARIANCES FOR TEXTURE SEGMENTATION. Annett Faber, Wolfgang Förstner
  • BAYESIAN METHODS: APPLICATIONS IN INFORMATION AGGREGATION AND IMAGE DATA MINING. Mihai Datcu and Klaus Seidel
  • TECHNICAL SESSION 4 FUSION OF SENSOR-DERIVED PRODUCTS
  • AUTOMATIC CLASSIFICATION OF URBAN ENVIRONMENTS FOR DATABASE REVISION USING LIDAR AND COLOR AERIAL IMAGERY. N. Haala, V. Walter
  • STRATEGIES AND METHODS FOR THE FUSION OF DIGITAL ELEVATION MODELS FROM OPTICAL AND SAR DATA. M. Honikel
  • INTEGRATION OF DTMS USING WAVELETS. M. Hahn, F. Samadzadegan
  • ANISOTROPY INFORMATION FROM MOMS-02/PRIRODA STEREO DATASETS - AN ADDITIONAL PHYSICAL PARAMETER FOR LAND SURFACE CHARACTERISATION. Th. Schneider, I. Manakos, Peter Reinartz, R. Müller
  • TECHNICAL SESSION 5 FUSION OF VARIABLE SPATIAL / SPECTRAL RESOLUTION IMAGES
  • ADAPTIVE FUSION OF MULTISOURCE RASTER DATA APPLYING FILTER TECHNIQUES. K. Steinnocher
  • FUSION OF 18 m MOMS-2P AND 30 m LANDS AT TM MULTISPECTRAL DATA BY THE GENERALIZED LAPLACIAN PYRAMID. Bruno Aiazzi, Luciano Alparone, Stefano Baronti, Ivan Pippi
  • OPERATIONAL APPLICATIONS OF MULTI-SENSOR IMAGE FUSION. C. Pohl, H. Touron
  • TECHNICAL SESSION 6 INTEGRATION OF IMAGE ANALYSIS AND GIS
  • KNOWLEDGE BASED INTERPRETATION OF MULTISENSOR AND MULTITEMPORAL REMOTE SENSING IMAGES. Stefan Growe
  • AUTOMATIC RECONSTRUCTION OF ROOFS FROM MAPS AND ELEVATION DATA. U. Stilla, K. Jurkiewicz
  • INVESTIGATION OF SYNERGY EFFECTS BETWEEN SATELLITE IMAGERY AND DIGITAL TOPOGRAPHIC DATABASES BY USING INTEGRATED KNOWLEDGE PROCESSING. Dietmar Kunz
  • INTERACTIVE SESSION 1 IMAGE CLASSIFICATION
  • AN AUTOMATED APPROACH FOR TRAINING DATA SELECTION WITHIN AN INTEGRATED GIS AND REMOTE SENSING ENVIRONMENT FOR MONITORING TEMPORAL CHANGES. Ulrich Rhein
  • CLASSIFICATION OF SETTLEMENT STRUCTURES USING MORPHOLOGICAL AND SPECTRAL FEATURES IN FUSED HIGH RESOLUTION SATELLITE IMAGES (IRS-1C). Maik Netzband, Gotthard Meinel, Regin Lippold
  • ASSESSMENT OF NOISE VARIANCE AND INFORMATION CONTENT OF MULTI-/HYPER-SPECTRAL IMAGERY. Bruno Aiazzi, Luciano Alparone, Alessandro Barducci, Stefano Baronti, Ivan Pippi
  • COMBINING SPECTRAL AND TEXTURAL FEATURES FOR MULTISPECTRAL IMAGE CLASSIFICATION WITH ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS. H. He , C. Collet
  • TECHNICAL SESSION 7 APPLICATIONS IN FORESTRY
  • SENSOR FUSED IMAGES FOR VISUAL INTERPRETATION OF FOREST STAND BORDERS. R. Fritz, I. Freeh, B. Koch, Chr. Ueffing
  • A LOCAL CORRELATION APPROACH FOR THE FUSION OF REMOTE SENSING DATA WITH DIFFERENT SPATIAL RESOLUTIONS IN FORESTRY APPLICATIONS. J. Hill, C. Diemer, O. Stöver, Th. Udelhoven
  • OBJECT-BASED CLASSIFICATION AND APPLICATIONS IN THE ALPINE FOREST ENVIRONMENT. R. de Kok, T. Schneider, U. Ammer
  • Author Index
  • Keyword Index
  • Cover

Full text

International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Vol. 32, Part 7-4-3 W6, Valladolid, Spain, 3-4 June, 1999 
175 
COMBINING SPECTRAL AND TEXTURAL FEATURES FOR MULTISPECTRAL 
IMAGE CLASSIFICATION WITH ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS 
H. He , C. Collet 
Department of Geography, University of Fribourg, Perolles, 1700 Fribourg, Switzerland 
hongchang.he@unifr.ch , claude.collet@unifr.ch 
KEYWORDS: Artificial Neural Networks, Multispectral Image, Landcover and Landuse, Classification, Grey Level Co-occurrence 
Matrix. 
ABSTRACT 
A new procedure for multispectral image classification was investigated in this study. This procedure incorporates textural features 
into conventional per-pixel classification and is implemented with artificial neural networks. The grey level co-occurrence matrix for 
textural measure calculation is derived from a supervised spectral classification based on three SPOT spectral bands (XS1, XS2 and 
XS3). Four textural measures, contrast, entropy, angular second moment and inverse difference moment, are calculated based on the 
grey level co-occurrence matrix. An artificial neural network using a variant of the back-propagation algorithm is applied to the 
procedure. 
The performance of the new procedure is assessed relative to that of a classification combining spectral features and textural 
measures based on the grey level co-occurrence matrix from the near-infrared SPOT band and a per-pixel classification procedure. 
The test results show that the classification accuracy with the new procedure can be improved by more than 10%, compared to the 
other two classification procedures. 
The study indicates that the textural measures based on the grey level co-occurrence matrix from the supervised spectral classification 
can reveal more effectively spatial forms of landcover and landuse in multispectral images. However, an inappropriate window size 
for textural feature extraction affects the fidelity of textural features. Window sizes of 5x5 and 7x7 can be considered as the 
appropriate ones for landcover and landuse classification in this test area. 
1. INTRODUCTION 
With the advent of higher spatial resolution satellite images and 
their wide application to landcover and landuse mapping, 
conventional per-pixel classifiers present more and more 
limitations for the data processing. This is mainly due to two 
factors. Firstly, conventional classifiers assume that landcover 
classes in satellite images follow some kind of specific 
distributions, e.g. Gaussian distribution, but in fact they are 
often spectrally complex and heterogeneous. Secondly, per- 
pixel classifiers are based only on spectral features, ignoring the 
spatial information in images. 
Many efforts have already been devoted to overcome these 
problems, and three procedures are representative among them. 
The first incorporates textural features into image classification 
(Haralick et al., 1973; Jensen, 1979; Marceau et al., 1990; 
Baraldi and Parmigianni, 1990; Sadler et al., 1991). However, 
this method is under dispute. Some studies indicated that it only 
provides a relatively small and sometimes even no practical 
improvement of the accuracy of landcover and landuse 
classification in urban areas compared to the use of only 
spectral features (Jensen, 1979; Baraldi and Parmigianni, 1990; 
Sadler et al., 1991). There are two possible reasons for these 
results: (a) the procedure used for extraction of textural features 
is based only on a single spectral image; thus, textural measures 
cannot completely reveal spatial forms of landcover and landuse 
in multispectral images; (b) the method also depends on 
statistical assumptions about class distributions. The second 
procedure is a spatial (or contextual) reclassification technique 
(Wharton, 1982; Gong and Howarth, 1992; Fung and Chan, 
1994). As two subsequent classifications are implemented in 
this scheme, errors from the two stages and their interaction 
would probably result in a decrease in the overall classification 
accuracy. The third procedure applies artificial neural networks 
(ANNs) in multispectral classification (Bischof et al., 1992; 
Paola and Schowengerdt, 1997). A continuously increasing 
number of investigations is focused on this classification 
procedure for three reasons: 
- The procedure does not require any a priori knowledge of the 
statistical distribution of the data, i.e., nonparametric 
classification. 
- It can classify landcover and landuse classes with any 
distribution, i.e. not only Gaussian but also multimodal or 
even disjoint. This means that the procedure is capable of 
classifying classes with heterogeneous data and high spatial 
variability. 
- It is adaptable and robust. 
Although this procedure results in high classification accuracy, 
typically more than 80%, it is also necessary to combine textural 
features into the procedure to fully exploit the potential of 
ANNs. However, very few attempts have been made up to now 
in this direction.
	        

Cite and reuse

Cite and reuse

Here you will find download options and citation links to the record and current image.

Monograph

METS MARC XML Dublin Core RIS Mirador ALTO TEI Full text PDF DFG-Viewer OPAC
TOC

Chapter

PDF RIS

Image

PDF ALTO TEI Full text
Download

Image fragment

Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame Link to IIIF image fragment

Citation links

Citation links

Monograph

To quote this record the following variants are available:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Chapter

To quote this structural element, the following variants are available:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Image

To quote this image the following variants are available:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Citation recommendation

baltsavias, emmanuel p. Fusion of Sensor Data, Knowledge Sources and Algorithms for Extraction and Classification of Topographic Objects. RICS Books, 1999.
Please check the citation before using it.

Image manipulation tools

Tools not available

Share image region

Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Contact

Have you found an error? Do you have any suggestions for making our service even better or any other questions about this page? Please write to us and we'll make sure we get back to you.

What is the first letter of the word "tree"?:

I hereby confirm the use of my personal data within the context of the enquiry made.