Retrodigitalisierung Logo Full screen
  • First image
  • Previous image
  • Next image
  • Last image
  • Show double pages
Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Fusion of sensor data, knowledge sources and algorithms for extraction and classification of topographic objects

Access restriction

There is no access restriction for this record.

Copyright

CC BY: Attribution 4.0 International. You can find more information here.

Bibliographic data

fullscreen: Fusion of sensor data, knowledge sources and algorithms for extraction and classification of topographic objects

Monograph

Persistent identifier:
856473650
Author:
Baltsavias, Emmanuel P.
Title:
Fusion of sensor data, knowledge sources and algorithms for extraction and classification of topographic objects
Sub title:
Joint ISPRS/EARSeL Workshop ; 3 - 4 June 1999, Valladolid, Spain
Scope:
III, 209 Seiten
Year of publication:
1999
Place of publication:
Coventry
Publisher of the original:
RICS Books
Identifier (digital):
856473650
Illustration:
Illustrationen, Diagramme, Karten
Language:
English
Usage licence:
Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
Publisher of the digital copy:
Technische Informationsbibliothek Hannover
Place of publication of the digital copy:
Hannover
Year of publication of the original:
2016
Document type:
Monograph
Collection:
Earth sciences

Chapter

Title:
TECHNICAL SESSION 2 PREREQUISITES FOR FUSION / INTEGRATION: IMAGE TO IMAGE / MAP REGISTRATION
Document type:
Monograph
Structure type:
Chapter

Chapter

Title:
GEORIS : A TOOL TO OVERLAY PRECISELY DIGITAL IMAGERY. Ph.Garnesson, D.Bruckert
Document type:
Monograph
Structure type:
Chapter

Contents

Table of contents

  • Fusion of sensor data, knowledge sources and algorithms for extraction and classification of topographic objects
  • Cover
  • ColorChart
  • Title page
  • CONTENTS
  • PREFACE
  • TECHNICAL SESSION 1 OVERVIEW OF IMAGE / DATA / INFORMATION FUSION AND INTEGRATION
  • DEFINITIONS AND TERMS OF REFERENCE IN DATA FUSION. L. Wald
  • TOOLS AND METHODS FOR FUSION OF IMAGES OF DIFFERENT SPATIAL RESOLUTION. C. Pohl
  • INTEGRATION OF IMAGE ANALYSIS AND GIS. Emmanuel Baltsavias, Michael Hahn,
  • TECHNICAL SESSION 2 PREREQUISITES FOR FUSION / INTEGRATION: IMAGE TO IMAGE / MAP REGISTRATION
  • GEOCODING AND COREGISTRATION OF MULTISENSOR AND MULTITEMPORAL REMOTE SENSING IMAGES. Hannes Raggam, Mathias Schardt and Heinz Gallaun
  • GEORIS : A TOOL TO OVERLAY PRECISELY DIGITAL IMAGERY. Ph.Garnesson, D.Bruckert
  • AUTOMATED PROCEDURES FOR MULTISENSOR REGISTRATION AND ORTHORECTIFICATION OF SATELLITE IMAGES. Ian Dowman and Paul Dare
  • TECHNICAL SESSION 3 OBJECT AND IMAGE CLASSIFICATION
  • LANDCOVER MAPPING BY INTERRELATED SEGMENTATION AND CLASSIFICATION OF SATELLITE IMAGES. W. Schneider, J. Steinwendner
  • INCLUSION OF MULTISPECTRAL DATA INTO OBJECT RECOGNITION. Bea Csathó , Toni Schenk, Dong-Cheon Lee and Sagi Filin
  • SCALE CHARACTERISTICS OF LOCAL AUTOCOVARIANCES FOR TEXTURE SEGMENTATION. Annett Faber, Wolfgang Förstner
  • BAYESIAN METHODS: APPLICATIONS IN INFORMATION AGGREGATION AND IMAGE DATA MINING. Mihai Datcu and Klaus Seidel
  • TECHNICAL SESSION 4 FUSION OF SENSOR-DERIVED PRODUCTS
  • AUTOMATIC CLASSIFICATION OF URBAN ENVIRONMENTS FOR DATABASE REVISION USING LIDAR AND COLOR AERIAL IMAGERY. N. Haala, V. Walter
  • STRATEGIES AND METHODS FOR THE FUSION OF DIGITAL ELEVATION MODELS FROM OPTICAL AND SAR DATA. M. Honikel
  • INTEGRATION OF DTMS USING WAVELETS. M. Hahn, F. Samadzadegan
  • ANISOTROPY INFORMATION FROM MOMS-02/PRIRODA STEREO DATASETS - AN ADDITIONAL PHYSICAL PARAMETER FOR LAND SURFACE CHARACTERISATION. Th. Schneider, I. Manakos, Peter Reinartz, R. Müller
  • TECHNICAL SESSION 5 FUSION OF VARIABLE SPATIAL / SPECTRAL RESOLUTION IMAGES
  • ADAPTIVE FUSION OF MULTISOURCE RASTER DATA APPLYING FILTER TECHNIQUES. K. Steinnocher
  • FUSION OF 18 m MOMS-2P AND 30 m LANDS AT TM MULTISPECTRAL DATA BY THE GENERALIZED LAPLACIAN PYRAMID. Bruno Aiazzi, Luciano Alparone, Stefano Baronti, Ivan Pippi
  • OPERATIONAL APPLICATIONS OF MULTI-SENSOR IMAGE FUSION. C. Pohl, H. Touron
  • TECHNICAL SESSION 6 INTEGRATION OF IMAGE ANALYSIS AND GIS
  • KNOWLEDGE BASED INTERPRETATION OF MULTISENSOR AND MULTITEMPORAL REMOTE SENSING IMAGES. Stefan Growe
  • AUTOMATIC RECONSTRUCTION OF ROOFS FROM MAPS AND ELEVATION DATA. U. Stilla, K. Jurkiewicz
  • INVESTIGATION OF SYNERGY EFFECTS BETWEEN SATELLITE IMAGERY AND DIGITAL TOPOGRAPHIC DATABASES BY USING INTEGRATED KNOWLEDGE PROCESSING. Dietmar Kunz
  • INTERACTIVE SESSION 1 IMAGE CLASSIFICATION
  • AN AUTOMATED APPROACH FOR TRAINING DATA SELECTION WITHIN AN INTEGRATED GIS AND REMOTE SENSING ENVIRONMENT FOR MONITORING TEMPORAL CHANGES. Ulrich Rhein
  • CLASSIFICATION OF SETTLEMENT STRUCTURES USING MORPHOLOGICAL AND SPECTRAL FEATURES IN FUSED HIGH RESOLUTION SATELLITE IMAGES (IRS-1C). Maik Netzband, Gotthard Meinel, Regin Lippold
  • ASSESSMENT OF NOISE VARIANCE AND INFORMATION CONTENT OF MULTI-/HYPER-SPECTRAL IMAGERY. Bruno Aiazzi, Luciano Alparone, Alessandro Barducci, Stefano Baronti, Ivan Pippi
  • COMBINING SPECTRAL AND TEXTURAL FEATURES FOR MULTISPECTRAL IMAGE CLASSIFICATION WITH ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS. H. He , C. Collet
  • TECHNICAL SESSION 7 APPLICATIONS IN FORESTRY
  • SENSOR FUSED IMAGES FOR VISUAL INTERPRETATION OF FOREST STAND BORDERS. R. Fritz, I. Freeh, B. Koch, Chr. Ueffing
  • A LOCAL CORRELATION APPROACH FOR THE FUSION OF REMOTE SENSING DATA WITH DIFFERENT SPATIAL RESOLUTIONS IN FORESTRY APPLICATIONS. J. Hill, C. Diemer, O. Stöver, Th. Udelhoven
  • OBJECT-BASED CLASSIFICATION AND APPLICATIONS IN THE ALPINE FOREST ENVIRONMENT. R. de Kok, T. Schneider, U. Ammer
  • Author Index
  • Keyword Index
  • Cover

Full text

International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Vol. 32, Part 7-4-3 W6, Valladolid, Spain, 3-4 June, 1999 
with an incidence angle of 27 degrees). The second corresponds 
to the case of a reference map (Michelin Map) and a historic 
map (Cassini map of 1756). The local approach guaranties a 
residual value of 0 for the tie points used by the process. Table 
1 shows the errors (mean, minimum and maximum values) 
estimated using control tie points. A considerable improvement 
through the use of the local correction is noted due to the fact 
that the local deformation is usually smooth. 
Polynomial 
approach 
Polynomial + local 
approach 
Mountainous area 
(34 control tie 
points) 
19.5,0.5,46.6 
9.1,0.7,28.3 
Cassini map 
(22 control tie 
points) 
9.1,4.8 , 19.9 
6.2,1.1 , 13.1 
Table 1. Coregistration errors (mean, minimum, maximum) for 
two methods (in pixels). 
When a DEM is available (only required for the master image), 
we assume that the correction to be applied is a function of the 
height (see Eq. 4). 
dxi = a Zj + b (4) 
dy ; = a’Zj + b’ 
The coefficients in Eq. 4 are estimated using the set of tie points 
(weighted in the same way as previously). 
When a DEM is available, this approach can provide more 
accurate results. For instance, in the case of the mountainous 
area, the error decreases from 9.1 to 1.3 pixels (see Table 2). 
Polynomial + local 
approach with DEM 
Mountainous area 
(34 control tie points) 
1.3,0.2,2.6 
Table 2. Coregistration errors (mean, minimum, maximum) 
when using local corractions and a DEM (in pixels). 
2.3. Use of Linear Features 
Another important characteristic of the GEORIS software is the 
capability to use, in addition to the tie points, selected linear 
features (road, railway, power line, shoreline, pipe, etc.) to 
compute the global and local models. These features are directly 
pointed by the operator (depending on the spatial resolution and 
the positioning accuracy to be reached, the features should be 
carefully pointed at, e.g. either the road strip or one of the edges 
of the road or the centerline of the road). When pointing a linear 
feature (i.e. road strip), it is not required that the beginning and 
the end of the linear feature have the same location in both 
images to be registered; only a common segment is needed. The 
linear features can be used either to calculate the registration 
error (from the results of matching of the linear features after 
the global and local models are applied to the image to be 
registered) or to compute the models themselves by using 
thousand of tie points which are automatically generated along 
the selected linear features. 
The registration error is estimated using a statistical approach. 
For each point of a considered feature, the model is applied and 
we search the nearest pixel of the corresponding feature in the 
other image. The distance obtained is used as an estimate of the 
matching accuracy. To limit matching errors, the matched pixels 
which involve the end points of the feature are ignored. 
This very simple approach permits to benefit in many cases, 
e.g., if only one straight line feature is available, it could be 
used by the system. This method is especially interesting to 
provide an estimation of the accuracy of the model without 
needing a large set of control tie points and with a better spatial 
distribution. Table 3 shows results (mean error) obtained for the 
previous examples. 
Polynomial 
approach 
Polynomial + 
local approach 
Polynomial + 
local approach 
with DEM 
Mountainous 
area 
(ca. 5500 points) 
8.3 
3.8 
1.0 
Cassini map 
(ca. 2800 points) 
3.7 
3.4 
- 
Table 3. Mean coregistration error (in pixels) using feature 
points as control tie points. 
In this case, linear features are used by the system as control tie 
points. Another mode that can be requested from the system is 
to use linear features as tie lines in order to improve the model. 
This function is implemented by an iterative process which 
automatically adds new tie points along a feature. This approach 
permits the user to visualise and control the tie points added by 
the system. 
3. GEORIS TOOL 
To meet the user and performance requirements specified, an 
exploitation procedure has been implemented to guide the 
operator step by step: select the zones of interest; catch the 
common features; calculate the registration model parameters; 
assess the positioning accuracy; apply the registration model; 
archive and export the registered images together with the 
registration models and the feature attributes. 
On-line easy-to-use tools are available to support the operator to 
draw precisely the features with scrollable zoom, improve the 
image contrast, adjust the position of ground control points and 
assess the relative positioning accuracy of any pixel in the 
image to be registered. 
As GEORIS is dedicated to prepare a set of images for photo 
interpretation tasks, an export facility has been developed to 
allow either projection of the raster and vector data in a selected
	        

Cite and reuse

Cite and reuse

Here you will find download options and citation links to the record and current image.

Monograph

METS MARC XML Dublin Core RIS Mirador ALTO TEI Full text PDF DFG-Viewer OPAC
TOC

Chapter

PDF RIS

Image

PDF ALTO TEI Full text
Download

Image fragment

Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame Link to IIIF image fragment

Citation links

Citation links

Monograph

To quote this record the following variants are available:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Chapter

To quote this structural element, the following variants are available:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Image

To quote this image the following variants are available:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Citation recommendation

baltsavias, emmanuel p. Fusion of Sensor Data, Knowledge Sources and Algorithms for Extraction and Classification of Topographic Objects. RICS Books, 1999.
Please check the citation before using it.

Image manipulation tools

Tools not available

Share image region

Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Contact

Have you found an error? Do you have any suggestions for making our service even better or any other questions about this page? Please write to us and we'll make sure we get back to you.

What color is the blue sky?:

I hereby confirm the use of my personal data within the context of the enquiry made.