Retrodigitalisierung Logo Full screen
  • First image
  • Previous image
  • Next image
  • Last image
  • Show double pages
Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Fusion of sensor data, knowledge sources and algorithms for extraction and classification of topographic objects

Access restriction

There is no access restriction for this record.

Copyright

CC BY: Attribution 4.0 International. You can find more information here.

Bibliographic data

fullscreen: Fusion of sensor data, knowledge sources and algorithms for extraction and classification of topographic objects

Monograph

Persistent identifier:
856473650
Author:
Baltsavias, Emmanuel P.
Title:
Fusion of sensor data, knowledge sources and algorithms for extraction and classification of topographic objects
Sub title:
Joint ISPRS/EARSeL Workshop ; 3 - 4 June 1999, Valladolid, Spain
Scope:
III, 209 Seiten
Year of publication:
1999
Place of publication:
Coventry
Publisher of the original:
RICS Books
Identifier (digital):
856473650
Illustration:
Illustrationen, Diagramme, Karten
Language:
English
Usage licence:
Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
Publisher of the digital copy:
Technische Informationsbibliothek Hannover
Place of publication of the digital copy:
Hannover
Year of publication of the original:
2016
Document type:
Monograph
Collection:
Earth sciences

Chapter

Title:
TECHNICAL SESSION 2 PREREQUISITES FOR FUSION / INTEGRATION: IMAGE TO IMAGE / MAP REGISTRATION
Document type:
Monograph
Structure type:
Chapter

Chapter

Title:
AUTOMATED PROCEDURES FOR MULTISENSOR REGISTRATION AND ORTHORECTIFICATION OF SATELLITE IMAGES. Ian Dowman and Paul Dare
Document type:
Monograph
Structure type:
Chapter

Contents

Table of contents

  • Fusion of sensor data, knowledge sources and algorithms for extraction and classification of topographic objects
  • Cover
  • ColorChart
  • Title page
  • CONTENTS
  • PREFACE
  • TECHNICAL SESSION 1 OVERVIEW OF IMAGE / DATA / INFORMATION FUSION AND INTEGRATION
  • DEFINITIONS AND TERMS OF REFERENCE IN DATA FUSION. L. Wald
  • TOOLS AND METHODS FOR FUSION OF IMAGES OF DIFFERENT SPATIAL RESOLUTION. C. Pohl
  • INTEGRATION OF IMAGE ANALYSIS AND GIS. Emmanuel Baltsavias, Michael Hahn,
  • TECHNICAL SESSION 2 PREREQUISITES FOR FUSION / INTEGRATION: IMAGE TO IMAGE / MAP REGISTRATION
  • GEOCODING AND COREGISTRATION OF MULTISENSOR AND MULTITEMPORAL REMOTE SENSING IMAGES. Hannes Raggam, Mathias Schardt and Heinz Gallaun
  • GEORIS : A TOOL TO OVERLAY PRECISELY DIGITAL IMAGERY. Ph.Garnesson, D.Bruckert
  • AUTOMATED PROCEDURES FOR MULTISENSOR REGISTRATION AND ORTHORECTIFICATION OF SATELLITE IMAGES. Ian Dowman and Paul Dare
  • TECHNICAL SESSION 3 OBJECT AND IMAGE CLASSIFICATION
  • LANDCOVER MAPPING BY INTERRELATED SEGMENTATION AND CLASSIFICATION OF SATELLITE IMAGES. W. Schneider, J. Steinwendner
  • INCLUSION OF MULTISPECTRAL DATA INTO OBJECT RECOGNITION. Bea Csathó , Toni Schenk, Dong-Cheon Lee and Sagi Filin
  • SCALE CHARACTERISTICS OF LOCAL AUTOCOVARIANCES FOR TEXTURE SEGMENTATION. Annett Faber, Wolfgang Förstner
  • BAYESIAN METHODS: APPLICATIONS IN INFORMATION AGGREGATION AND IMAGE DATA MINING. Mihai Datcu and Klaus Seidel
  • TECHNICAL SESSION 4 FUSION OF SENSOR-DERIVED PRODUCTS
  • AUTOMATIC CLASSIFICATION OF URBAN ENVIRONMENTS FOR DATABASE REVISION USING LIDAR AND COLOR AERIAL IMAGERY. N. Haala, V. Walter
  • STRATEGIES AND METHODS FOR THE FUSION OF DIGITAL ELEVATION MODELS FROM OPTICAL AND SAR DATA. M. Honikel
  • INTEGRATION OF DTMS USING WAVELETS. M. Hahn, F. Samadzadegan
  • ANISOTROPY INFORMATION FROM MOMS-02/PRIRODA STEREO DATASETS - AN ADDITIONAL PHYSICAL PARAMETER FOR LAND SURFACE CHARACTERISATION. Th. Schneider, I. Manakos, Peter Reinartz, R. Müller
  • TECHNICAL SESSION 5 FUSION OF VARIABLE SPATIAL / SPECTRAL RESOLUTION IMAGES
  • ADAPTIVE FUSION OF MULTISOURCE RASTER DATA APPLYING FILTER TECHNIQUES. K. Steinnocher
  • FUSION OF 18 m MOMS-2P AND 30 m LANDS AT TM MULTISPECTRAL DATA BY THE GENERALIZED LAPLACIAN PYRAMID. Bruno Aiazzi, Luciano Alparone, Stefano Baronti, Ivan Pippi
  • OPERATIONAL APPLICATIONS OF MULTI-SENSOR IMAGE FUSION. C. Pohl, H. Touron
  • TECHNICAL SESSION 6 INTEGRATION OF IMAGE ANALYSIS AND GIS
  • KNOWLEDGE BASED INTERPRETATION OF MULTISENSOR AND MULTITEMPORAL REMOTE SENSING IMAGES. Stefan Growe
  • AUTOMATIC RECONSTRUCTION OF ROOFS FROM MAPS AND ELEVATION DATA. U. Stilla, K. Jurkiewicz
  • INVESTIGATION OF SYNERGY EFFECTS BETWEEN SATELLITE IMAGERY AND DIGITAL TOPOGRAPHIC DATABASES BY USING INTEGRATED KNOWLEDGE PROCESSING. Dietmar Kunz
  • INTERACTIVE SESSION 1 IMAGE CLASSIFICATION
  • AN AUTOMATED APPROACH FOR TRAINING DATA SELECTION WITHIN AN INTEGRATED GIS AND REMOTE SENSING ENVIRONMENT FOR MONITORING TEMPORAL CHANGES. Ulrich Rhein
  • CLASSIFICATION OF SETTLEMENT STRUCTURES USING MORPHOLOGICAL AND SPECTRAL FEATURES IN FUSED HIGH RESOLUTION SATELLITE IMAGES (IRS-1C). Maik Netzband, Gotthard Meinel, Regin Lippold
  • ASSESSMENT OF NOISE VARIANCE AND INFORMATION CONTENT OF MULTI-/HYPER-SPECTRAL IMAGERY. Bruno Aiazzi, Luciano Alparone, Alessandro Barducci, Stefano Baronti, Ivan Pippi
  • COMBINING SPECTRAL AND TEXTURAL FEATURES FOR MULTISPECTRAL IMAGE CLASSIFICATION WITH ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS. H. He , C. Collet
  • TECHNICAL SESSION 7 APPLICATIONS IN FORESTRY
  • SENSOR FUSED IMAGES FOR VISUAL INTERPRETATION OF FOREST STAND BORDERS. R. Fritz, I. Freeh, B. Koch, Chr. Ueffing
  • A LOCAL CORRELATION APPROACH FOR THE FUSION OF REMOTE SENSING DATA WITH DIFFERENT SPATIAL RESOLUTIONS IN FORESTRY APPLICATIONS. J. Hill, C. Diemer, O. Stöver, Th. Udelhoven
  • OBJECT-BASED CLASSIFICATION AND APPLICATIONS IN THE ALPINE FOREST ENVIRONMENT. R. de Kok, T. Schneider, U. Ammer
  • Author Index
  • Keyword Index
  • Cover

Full text

International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Vol. 32, Part 7-4-3 W6, Valladolid, Spain, 3-4 June, 1999 
AUTOMATED PROCEDURES FOR MULTISENSOR REGISTRATION AND ORTHORECTIFICATION OF 
SATELLITE IMAGES 
Ian Dowman* and Paul Daret 
♦Department of Geomatic Engineering, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, idowman@ge.ucl.ac.uk 
■¡■Formerly at UCL now at Department of Geomatics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia 
KEY WORDS: Automated registration, satellite data, image segmentation, polygon matching. 
ABSTRACT 
The need for automation in the registration of image to image and image to map is widely recognised and work has been going on for 
some time in both the photogrammetric and remote sensing disciplines. The image to image registration problem is some way to 
being solved for images from the same or similar sensors but there are considerable problems if the resolution of the images are 
different or if optical and microwave sensors are involved. Strategies are needed which will identify common features in images with 
different pixel size or radiometry and without dependency on initial orientation. 
The basic techniques which are used are the extraction of line and area features from image and/or a map and then the matching of 
these features. The polygon or patch is the main feature used. These are extracted from vector data by selecting features with an 
appropriate attribute, for example lakes, forests or field boundaries. The polygons can be extracted from the images by thresholding, 
homogeneous patch detection or segmentation. The paper describes studies to determine the best method for patch extraction for an 
automatic system to match SAR and SPOT data and some new techniques for this extraction, including techniques for increasing 
automation. 
The basic techniques of matching polygons is adapted from Abbasi-Dezfouli and Freeman, (1994). Polygons are characterised by a 
number of parameters such as shape and area. A revised approach is described here which does not use chain code and in which an 
iterative approach is followed. Other developments from previous methods are also described and results show that registration of 
complete satellite images can be achieved. Results from the image to map registration in the ARCHANGEL project are also 
described. 
1. INTRODUCTION 
The term automated needs some clarification. The ultimate aim 
of any digital system will often be to complete a process from 
end to end without human interference. Such an aim cannot be 
met at present and will not be met within the near future for 
registration of images. However, human interaction can be 
minimised and rationalised at a number of levels. We can make 
individual algorithms or processes as automatic as possible and 
only require human intervention to set parameters and check 
output. We can also design strategies in such a way that some 
decisions can be automatically taken, or at least set at the 
beginning of the procedure. Both these aspects will be discussed 
in the paper. 
The paper will first review the requirements for image to image 
registration and image to map registration, and set out the 
overall strategies which have been adopted. The algorithms to 
be used to extract features for matching will then be described 
and choice of suitable algorithms discussed. The selected 
algorithms will then be applied to polygon extraction and 
techniques for this process will be described and discussed. The 
techniques for polygon matching will then be presented and 
finally some examples will be given. 
2. STRATEGIES FOR IMAGE REGISTRATION 
An image registration system needs to be as generic as possible 
and we have worked towards a system which will accept any 
type of image data as input. This includes data from optical 
sensors, from microwave sensors and from vector data bases 
(maps). There are differences in the types of feature which can 
be extracted from data of different scale or resolution. Here, we 
will concentrate on small scale data such as might be collected 
from satellite sensors and be compatible with map scales of 1:10 
000 to 1:50 000. Such an approach implies the setting of an 
overall strategy and the provision of a toolbox of processes to 
meet different requirements. The high level strategy is shown in 
Figure 1. 
Figure 1. A registration strategy. 
Polygonal features are chosen as the prime feature for matching 
because such features are found in all types of data. Obvious 
examples are water bodies, forests and field boundaries. These 
features can be found by segmenting images or will be extracted
	        

Cite and reuse

Cite and reuse

Here you will find download options and citation links to the record and current image.

Monograph

METS MARC XML Dublin Core RIS Mirador ALTO TEI Full text PDF DFG-Viewer OPAC
TOC

Chapter

PDF RIS

Image

PDF ALTO TEI Full text
Download

Image fragment

Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame Link to IIIF image fragment

Citation links

Citation links

Monograph

To quote this record the following variants are available:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Chapter

To quote this structural element, the following variants are available:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Image

To quote this image the following variants are available:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Citation recommendation

baltsavias, emmanuel p. Fusion of Sensor Data, Knowledge Sources and Algorithms for Extraction and Classification of Topographic Objects. RICS Books, 1999.
Please check the citation before using it.

Image manipulation tools

Tools not available

Share image region

Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Contact

Have you found an error? Do you have any suggestions for making our service even better or any other questions about this page? Please write to us and we'll make sure we get back to you.

What is the first letter of the word "tree"?:

I hereby confirm the use of my personal data within the context of the enquiry made.