Retrodigitalisierung Logo Full screen
  • First image
  • Previous image
  • Next image
  • Last image
  • Show double pages
Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Fusion of sensor data, knowledge sources and algorithms for extraction and classification of topographic objects

Access restriction

There is no access restriction for this record.

Copyright

CC BY: Attribution 4.0 International. You can find more information here.

Bibliographic data

fullscreen: Fusion of sensor data, knowledge sources and algorithms for extraction and classification of topographic objects

Monograph

Persistent identifier:
856473650
Author:
Baltsavias, Emmanuel P.
Title:
Fusion of sensor data, knowledge sources and algorithms for extraction and classification of topographic objects
Sub title:
Joint ISPRS/EARSeL Workshop ; 3 - 4 June 1999, Valladolid, Spain
Scope:
III, 209 Seiten
Year of publication:
1999
Place of publication:
Coventry
Publisher of the original:
RICS Books
Identifier (digital):
856473650
Illustration:
Illustrationen, Diagramme, Karten
Language:
English
Usage licence:
Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
Publisher of the digital copy:
Technische Informationsbibliothek Hannover
Place of publication of the digital copy:
Hannover
Year of publication of the original:
2016
Document type:
Monograph
Collection:
Earth sciences

Chapter

Title:
TECHNICAL SESSION 3 OBJECT AND IMAGE CLASSIFICATION
Document type:
Monograph
Structure type:
Chapter

Chapter

Title:
SCALE CHARACTERISTICS OF LOCAL AUTOCOVARIANCES FOR TEXTURE SEGMENTATION. Annett Faber, Wolfgang Förstner
Document type:
Monograph
Structure type:
Chapter

Contents

Table of contents

  • Fusion of sensor data, knowledge sources and algorithms for extraction and classification of topographic objects
  • Cover
  • ColorChart
  • Title page
  • CONTENTS
  • PREFACE
  • TECHNICAL SESSION 1 OVERVIEW OF IMAGE / DATA / INFORMATION FUSION AND INTEGRATION
  • DEFINITIONS AND TERMS OF REFERENCE IN DATA FUSION. L. Wald
  • TOOLS AND METHODS FOR FUSION OF IMAGES OF DIFFERENT SPATIAL RESOLUTION. C. Pohl
  • INTEGRATION OF IMAGE ANALYSIS AND GIS. Emmanuel Baltsavias, Michael Hahn,
  • TECHNICAL SESSION 2 PREREQUISITES FOR FUSION / INTEGRATION: IMAGE TO IMAGE / MAP REGISTRATION
  • GEOCODING AND COREGISTRATION OF MULTISENSOR AND MULTITEMPORAL REMOTE SENSING IMAGES. Hannes Raggam, Mathias Schardt and Heinz Gallaun
  • GEORIS : A TOOL TO OVERLAY PRECISELY DIGITAL IMAGERY. Ph.Garnesson, D.Bruckert
  • AUTOMATED PROCEDURES FOR MULTISENSOR REGISTRATION AND ORTHORECTIFICATION OF SATELLITE IMAGES. Ian Dowman and Paul Dare
  • TECHNICAL SESSION 3 OBJECT AND IMAGE CLASSIFICATION
  • LANDCOVER MAPPING BY INTERRELATED SEGMENTATION AND CLASSIFICATION OF SATELLITE IMAGES. W. Schneider, J. Steinwendner
  • INCLUSION OF MULTISPECTRAL DATA INTO OBJECT RECOGNITION. Bea Csathó , Toni Schenk, Dong-Cheon Lee and Sagi Filin
  • SCALE CHARACTERISTICS OF LOCAL AUTOCOVARIANCES FOR TEXTURE SEGMENTATION. Annett Faber, Wolfgang Förstner
  • BAYESIAN METHODS: APPLICATIONS IN INFORMATION AGGREGATION AND IMAGE DATA MINING. Mihai Datcu and Klaus Seidel
  • TECHNICAL SESSION 4 FUSION OF SENSOR-DERIVED PRODUCTS
  • AUTOMATIC CLASSIFICATION OF URBAN ENVIRONMENTS FOR DATABASE REVISION USING LIDAR AND COLOR AERIAL IMAGERY. N. Haala, V. Walter
  • STRATEGIES AND METHODS FOR THE FUSION OF DIGITAL ELEVATION MODELS FROM OPTICAL AND SAR DATA. M. Honikel
  • INTEGRATION OF DTMS USING WAVELETS. M. Hahn, F. Samadzadegan
  • ANISOTROPY INFORMATION FROM MOMS-02/PRIRODA STEREO DATASETS - AN ADDITIONAL PHYSICAL PARAMETER FOR LAND SURFACE CHARACTERISATION. Th. Schneider, I. Manakos, Peter Reinartz, R. Müller
  • TECHNICAL SESSION 5 FUSION OF VARIABLE SPATIAL / SPECTRAL RESOLUTION IMAGES
  • ADAPTIVE FUSION OF MULTISOURCE RASTER DATA APPLYING FILTER TECHNIQUES. K. Steinnocher
  • FUSION OF 18 m MOMS-2P AND 30 m LANDS AT TM MULTISPECTRAL DATA BY THE GENERALIZED LAPLACIAN PYRAMID. Bruno Aiazzi, Luciano Alparone, Stefano Baronti, Ivan Pippi
  • OPERATIONAL APPLICATIONS OF MULTI-SENSOR IMAGE FUSION. C. Pohl, H. Touron
  • TECHNICAL SESSION 6 INTEGRATION OF IMAGE ANALYSIS AND GIS
  • KNOWLEDGE BASED INTERPRETATION OF MULTISENSOR AND MULTITEMPORAL REMOTE SENSING IMAGES. Stefan Growe
  • AUTOMATIC RECONSTRUCTION OF ROOFS FROM MAPS AND ELEVATION DATA. U. Stilla, K. Jurkiewicz
  • INVESTIGATION OF SYNERGY EFFECTS BETWEEN SATELLITE IMAGERY AND DIGITAL TOPOGRAPHIC DATABASES BY USING INTEGRATED KNOWLEDGE PROCESSING. Dietmar Kunz
  • INTERACTIVE SESSION 1 IMAGE CLASSIFICATION
  • AN AUTOMATED APPROACH FOR TRAINING DATA SELECTION WITHIN AN INTEGRATED GIS AND REMOTE SENSING ENVIRONMENT FOR MONITORING TEMPORAL CHANGES. Ulrich Rhein
  • CLASSIFICATION OF SETTLEMENT STRUCTURES USING MORPHOLOGICAL AND SPECTRAL FEATURES IN FUSED HIGH RESOLUTION SATELLITE IMAGES (IRS-1C). Maik Netzband, Gotthard Meinel, Regin Lippold
  • ASSESSMENT OF NOISE VARIANCE AND INFORMATION CONTENT OF MULTI-/HYPER-SPECTRAL IMAGERY. Bruno Aiazzi, Luciano Alparone, Alessandro Barducci, Stefano Baronti, Ivan Pippi
  • COMBINING SPECTRAL AND TEXTURAL FEATURES FOR MULTISPECTRAL IMAGE CLASSIFICATION WITH ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS. H. He , C. Collet
  • TECHNICAL SESSION 7 APPLICATIONS IN FORESTRY
  • SENSOR FUSED IMAGES FOR VISUAL INTERPRETATION OF FOREST STAND BORDERS. R. Fritz, I. Freeh, B. Koch, Chr. Ueffing
  • A LOCAL CORRELATION APPROACH FOR THE FUSION OF REMOTE SENSING DATA WITH DIFFERENT SPATIAL RESOLUTIONS IN FORESTRY APPLICATIONS. J. Hill, C. Diemer, O. Stöver, Th. Udelhoven
  • OBJECT-BASED CLASSIFICATION AND APPLICATIONS IN THE ALPINE FOREST ENVIRONMENT. R. de Kok, T. Schneider, U. Ammer
  • Author Index
  • Keyword Index
  • Cover

Full text

International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing,Vol. 32, Part 7-4-3 W6, Valladolid, Spain, 3-4 June, 1999 
SCALE CHARACTERISTICS OF LOCAL AUTOCOVARIANCES FOR TEXTURE SEGMENTATION 
Annett Faber, Wolfgang Forstner 
Institute of Photogrammetry, University Bonn, NuBallee 15, D-53115 Bonn, Germany, email: (annett,wf)@ipb.uni-bonn.de 
KEY WORDS: texture representation, Laplacian pyramid, spectral decomposition, eigenvalues, urban structure. 
ABSTRACT 
This paper describes research on the extraction of urban structures from aerial images or high resolution satellite scenes 
like the German MOMS02 sensor. We aim at a separation of neighboring textured regions important for describing different 
urban structures. It has been shown, that grey level segmentation alone is not sufficient to solve this problem. If we want 
to use texture additionally, the development of a suitable representation of texture images is required. We use the scale 
characteristics of the local autocovariance function, called SCAF, of the possibly multiband image function. The final result 
of the process are texture edges. 
1 INTRODUCTION 
Texture is one of the most fundamental and at the same 
time most interesting characteristics of visible surfaces in 
the human perception process. Therefore, in pattern recog 
nition the analysis of textures is very important. Numerous 
techniques for texture analysis have been proposed. They 
can be mainly categorized as (Haralick and Shapiro, 1992): 
1. Texture classification: For a given textured region, de 
cide, to which one out of a finite number of classes the 
region belongs. 
2. Texture synthesis: For a given textured region, deter 
mine a description or a model. 
3. Texture segmentation: In a given image, which con 
tains many textured regions, determine the boundaries 
between these regions. 
The procedures developed for the solution of these prob 
lems can be subdivided into three categories: structural ap 
proaches, statistical approaches and filterbased approaches 
(J.-R de Beuaville and Langlais, 1994, Reed and du Buf, 
1993, Shao and Forstner, 1994). 
Structural approaches assume that textures contain de 
tectable primitive elements which generate the texture 
in a regular or irregular manner, following certain con 
nection rules. Such approaches use e. g. so-called 
texture grammars (Carlucci, 1976) or texture elements 
(Julez and Bergen, 1983). 
Due to the almost unlimited number of possible unit 
patterns and the complexity of the rules, these proce 
dures have shown lower success in texture analysis 
than the following two approaches. 
Statistical approaches use statistical characteristics, deriv 
able from the images. These characteristics are often 
sufficient for texture classification and segmentation, 
without needing generation rules for the textures. They 
can further be separated into approaches which use 
• descriptions derivable directly from the images 
such as variance, entropy or other values ob 
tained from the local pixel neighborhood, as e. g. 
co-occurrences (Haralick, 1979) and 
• model based descriptions, such as autoregres 
sive models, Markov or Gibbs random fields (An- 
drey and Tarroux, 1996, Derin and Cole, 1986). 
Statistical approaches usually refer to the image grid, 
thus have difficulties in handling scale space proper 
ties. 
Filter based approaches assume that the image function 
can be described locally by its amplitude spectra. Ga 
bor wavelets have been the first choice together with 
linear and nonlinear post processing steps to achieve 
multi scale features in the different channels (A. C. Bovik 
and Geisler, 1990, Bigun and du Buf, 1992, Malik and 
Perona, 1990). This class of approaches is motivated 
by their similarity to the human visual system. 
The advantage is that the filter responses for basic ge 
ometrical transformations are predictable and the fil 
ters work equally for natural scenes of different texture 
types. However, there is no general approach for the 
selection of a suitable filter bank and for the linkage of 
different image channels. 
2 MOTIVATION 
We are interested in analyzing satellite and aerial images 
especially for extracting urban structures. Therefore, we 
need powerful techniques for image segmentation in the 
presence of natural textures. Grey level or color segmen 
tation results often suffer from over or under segmentation. 
Texture segmentation can reduce the amount of over seg 
mentation, mostly without the risk of under-segmentation. 
Our first experiences with Gabor wavelets based on (Ma 
lik and Perona, 1990) demonstrated the feasibility of a fil 
ter based approach for texture edge extraction (Shao and 
Forstner, 1994). Our approach used the edge detection 
scheme in ourfeature extraction program FEX (Fuchs, 1998), 
cf. Figure 1c). It exploits its ability to handle multichannel 
images by taking the filter responses as a multichannel im 
age as input. 
Due to the heavy algorithmic complexity, we develop a new 
filter based scheme for deriving texture edges again us 
ing the edge extraction scheme of our feature extraction
	        

Cite and reuse

Cite and reuse

Here you will find download options and citation links to the record and current image.

Monograph

METS MARC XML Dublin Core RIS Mirador ALTO TEI Full text PDF DFG-Viewer OPAC
TOC

Chapter

PDF RIS

Image

PDF ALTO TEI Full text
Download

Image fragment

Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame Link to IIIF image fragment

Citation links

Citation links

Monograph

To quote this record the following variants are available:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Chapter

To quote this structural element, the following variants are available:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Image

To quote this image the following variants are available:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Citation recommendation

baltsavias, emmanuel p. Fusion of Sensor Data, Knowledge Sources and Algorithms for Extraction and Classification of Topographic Objects. RICS Books, 1999.
Please check the citation before using it.

Image manipulation tools

Tools not available

Share image region

Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Contact

Have you found an error? Do you have any suggestions for making our service even better or any other questions about this page? Please write to us and we'll make sure we get back to you.

Which word does not fit into the series: car green bus train:

I hereby confirm the use of my personal data within the context of the enquiry made.