Sharing and cooperation in geo-information technology

Aziz, T. Lukman

Bibliographic data

Monograph

Persistent identifier:: 856479470

Author:: Aziz, T. Lukman

Title:: Sharing and cooperation in geo-information technology

Sub title:: ISPRS Commission VI Symposium, April 15 - 17, 1999, Bandung, Indonesia

Scope:: 1 Online-Ressource (130 Seiten)

Year of publication:: 1999

Place of publication:: London

Publisher of the original:: RICS Books

Identifier (digital):: 856479470

Illustration:: Illustrationen, Diagramme

Language:: English

Usage licence:: Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)

Publisher of the digital copy:: Technische Informationsbibliothek Hannover

Place of publication of the digital copy:: Hannover

Year of publication of the original:: 2016

Document type:: Monograph

Collection:: Earth sciences

Chapter

Title:: WG VI/1: EDUCATION

Document type:: Monograph

Structure type:: Chapter

Chapter

Title:: EDUCATION IN REMOTE SENSING APPLICATION. Prof. Dr. Jan J. Nossin

Document type:: Monograph

Structure type:: Chapter

14 environmental management , regional and sectoral (resources) There is not a clearly defined link between this specialist level, in development and planning. and the official apparatus that is to make use of the information aw they make (or can make) available. fro Approximation of product users fields : pre National mapping Here lies one of the main bottlenecks in user education.. j n Map updating the Cadastral surveys, land information What was said above about the rapid development of our data ^ collection capacity, applies also to the capacity of information Environmental monitoring management. Desertification by Natural hazard identification This gap between data collection and management on the one Natural disaster mitigation hand, and the 'users' 'capacity to make good use of it on the f or Pollution control other hand, is a reality, but understandable: ¡ n remote sensing still is technology-driven, and although an Geological mapping operational status is claimed, there are plenty of constraints. We ^ Engineering site selection list only a few: Mineral prospecting - weather (cloud) constraints for optical satellites Ground water survey - complexity of radar data for the interpreter Watershed management - weather constraints for aerial photography Water resources management - security constraints for aerial photography and airborne radar - occasional mishaps in launching (Landsat 6) or operation Agriculture (SPOT 3) Tht Crop monitoring It amounts to a semi-operational status at best, and the ^ £C Soil survey information extraction from RS data depends highly on the ^ Pests and diseases professional level of reference of the interpreter. Estate farms * Range land monitoring and management It may be clear that for Local Administrations, the scale factor ove Forest inventory/management must be added to all this: is the area big enough to warrant SP< remote sensing application ? We presume it is. exii Land use and evaluation surveys eart Regional development studies The local authority will not normally develop its own ava information-extraction capability, leaving that to the rather ^ Coastal zone management diffuse professional expertise. Fisheries On the other hand, the information management capacity (GIS) Aquaculture is often developed by these authorities. , . . . . . arra Maritime monitoring It may be assumed that for development purposes, the P ro< Development planning (a derivative) policy is set somewhere at the interplay of the level of Thi: International agencies for project execution planners and decisionmakers. of n It may be stated that in general terms, the 0 the Educational institutes information-collection potential of remote sensing techniques is thei Primary and secondary schools, geography not optimally used for planning and decisionmaking. can Universities, research , regional studies j n f 0 Scientific laboratories, research projects This includes traditional aerial photography, which, after all, remains a fully operational and thoroughly tested technology. Urban and local authorities The haze of security constraints and secretiveness that surround terr ‘ Urban planning, expansion monitoring air photos at the official level will be a familiar and recognized S eo l Infrastructure and communication phenomenon for most users. The picture differs, of course, from Teel Urban geology/hydrology one country to another. tend Road traffic Especially the combination of aerial photography with the as Road construction, planning "other" remote sensing techniques is a very powerful source of mos information, and not only for planners. w j t j, 5. RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN TECHNICAL AND USERS LEVELS Education for this important category of end users (Planners, ^ Policymakers, Decisionmakers), and the technical toplevel that t0 d The specialist echelon that is engaged in information extraction is engaged in decision-preparation therefore is an instrument to from remotely sensed data, is mostly a conglomerate- not very optimize the proper use of remote sensing. ^ coherent- of university laboratories, research institutes, government departments or bureaus, resource management That is not enough: the (end) user must also be made aware of INF offices, specialized educational institutes and the like. what is available in terms of data collection techniques, now valu

Access restriction

Copyright

fullscreen: Sharing and cooperation in geo-information technology

Monograph

Chapter

Chapter

Table of contents

Cite and reuse

Monograph

Chapter

Image

Image fragment

Citation links

Citation recommendation