Full text: Close-range imaging, long-range vision

el to the 
gonal to 
H to the 
(6) 
remain- 
1ce they 
nally: 
(7) 
g aspect 
ation. A 
ove' the 
ring it). 
g to the 
(8) 
| size of 
Eq. (6), 
(9) 
one step 
vanish- 
> image, 
red only 
allelism 
| will be 
1swer to 
inishing 
ntioned 
je recti- 
und X- 
nd p on 
Y -axis); 
1€ Cross 
= don 
ments d 
se lines 
patch is 
as been 
rmation 
is possible only on the line of the known length. On the right, 
one may see the outcome of affine rectification from two known 
lengths, described above. Here, parallelism has been restored in 
all directions. Angles can be restored only if the angle between 
the two directions is known. Measurement is here possible on 
all lines along the correctly scaled y-direction. 
  
  
  
  
  
Figure 8. Vanishing point F, from lengths a, b on parallel lines. 
  
  
  
Figure 9. Rectification with one and two vanishing points. 
This approach, requiring a second known length on the ground, 
is important as it bypasses the constraint on camera orientation. 
In the present case, however, images were assumed to have only 
a tilt about the horizontal x-axis, hence the approach with one 
vanishing point and one known distance was actually applied. 
3.3 Practical evaluation 
The performance of the approach, laid out in section 3.2.2, for 
1D measurement based on one finite vanishing point (that in the 
direction of the road axis, with the second assumed at infinity) 
has been evaluated against 2D-2D measurement (section 3.1). A 
total of 11 vehicles in all three lanes were followed, and their 
speed was found from 4-8 frames. Three independent estima- 
tions were made, based on three different known distances (seen 
in Fig. 10) to establish the repeatability of results. 
  
  
Figure 10. Known distances a, b, c used for speed estimation. 
The vehicle's shadow was manually measured on the first frame 
and was then automatically followed in subsequent frames with 
a simple correlation technique. This has been facilitated by the 
use of rectified images. In Fig. 11, the affine transformations of 
three frames are shown. 
   
S 
  
  
ik 
Figure 11. Affine rectifications of successive frames. 
The results are seen in Table 12, which presents mean speed d 
and standard deviation o from all frames of each vehicle. Only 
very few outlying estimates have been rejected, namely from 
the far end of the road where image scale is too small and 
measuring errors cause very large displacements. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
Table 12. Speed estimation in km/h from 1D measurements 
using three different known distances a, 5b, c (11 vehicles) 
ID 2D 
a b C 
d o d o d o d o 
95 +2 94 +2 95 +2 95 +] 
110 +2 110 +2 110 +2 109 +1 
118 +2 117 +2 118 +2 118 +2 
99 +2 99 +2 100 +2 98 +1 
115 +1 115 +1 116 +1 116 +1 
122 +2 122 +2 120 +2 122 +2 
146 +3 146 +3 146 +3 144 +2 
103 +1 102 +1 103 +1 103 +1 
133 +2 132 +2 133 +2 133 +1 
132 +1 131 +1 132 +1 131 +2 
156 +3 156 +3 157 +3 155 +1 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
The results indicate that the simple approach of affine rectifica- 
tion using one vanishing point and one known distance (under 
the assumption that the image plane is parallel to the X-axis of 
the road) compare very well with metric data derived from full 
2D-2D projective transformation (the validity of which has been 
established with GPS measurements). 
4. CONCLUDING REMARKS 
In this contribution methods have been presented for extracting 
metric data form single uncalibrated images (in the specific con- 
text of road and traffic scenes). Based on a combination of pho- 
togrammetric and computer vision approaches, the methods are 
very simple requiring minimal external information (one known 
distance) if ‘reasonable’ assumptions are adopted. In both cases 
images are subject to affine deformations, yet ID measurements 
are possible in the properly scaled direction. It has been further 
demonstrated that both methods are capable of providing metric 
results of satisfactory accuracy. 
Of course, important questions still wait to be addressed. For in- 
stance, lane width estimation is limited to linear road segments. 
2:5. 
 
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.